SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Jeremy suggested that I use the wiki, so I thought I would give it a try.
Quote:
LQ articles and tutorials us the same vbcode format as posts do. You have a great thread going, BTW - thanks! As you seems to be iteratively building the content, the LQ Wiki may be a great place to move the project. It would allow other to help, keep a history for you, allow better formatting, etc. If you have any questions, let me know.
Wow, didn't know that much information was already available on Slackware. At least in the sense of not having to search for it and piece it together. This is good stuff. Thank you.
I noticed, as well as a couple line breaks, in the Window Managers section I see you have XFCE listed as well as xfwm (I fixed the faq link.. it was missing a '[' and the plain text of "Download" kind of looked awkward on the same line.) Shouldn't XFCE be listed under Desktop Environments?
I noticed, as well as a couple line breaks, in the Window Managers section I see you have XFCE listed as well as xfwm (I fixed the faq link.. it was missing a '[' and the plain text of "Download" kind of looked awkward on the same line.) Shouldn't XFCE be listed under Desktop Environments?
Hi,
Yes, some consider xfce a light desktop environment. Probably has been that way since the original post. Some tend to consider xfce a window manager since it is so light. But in essence it is an environment. The xfce & xfwm a unique. The xcfe is for 4.2.4 and xfwm for 4.4.1 . Just a slip on my part. XFWM is a window manager for XFCE.
I did some edit/search/replaced on a off line copy of the original post to move to the wiki late last evening and really did not make a thorough check of the wiki. Today I've noticed a few things that needed addressed.
Jeremy suggested the use of the wiki. I thought it would be a lot to move over. Not bad at all. I really like the idea of sharing the work on the post. More involvement by the community.
i've changed my sig to reflect the new links page.
Hi,
Thanks!
I really thought the wiki would be difficult to move the post too. A little effort in the edit but it seems to be worth it.
I like the idea of sharing the load with the community. That way we should see some growth in the interest and use of the links list.
The one thing I wish is that to make the moves or anything intra-related that the LQ Wiki standardize with the LQ post, articles and tutorials. Especially the http:/www. links. That way no problem would exist between the forums, wiki and articles.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.