Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
05-25-2009, 07:01 AM
|
#241
|
|
Guru
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,592
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinegaroon
|
oh, ok thanks anyway tho, just wanted to know what worked 
|
|
|
|
05-25-2009, 08:42 PM
|
#242
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2007
Posts: 253
Rep:
|
Yawn ....
Pat, a 64 bit version would have been REAL news about 3 to 4 YEARS ago!  However, it's better late than never. Yes, we do thank those involved in finally getting it out the door, but the whole event seems rather anti-climactic to me. Waiting on 64 bit support for the Java and Flash plug-ins for FireFox was probably a concern.
Anyhow, cheers!
|
|
|
|
05-25-2009, 08:53 PM
|
#243
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
Distribution: Scientific Linux 6 x64
Posts: 211
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tpreitzel
Yawn ....
Pat, a 64 bit version would have been REAL news about 3 to 4 YEARS ago!  However, it's better late than never. Yes, we do thank those involved in finally getting it out the door, but the whole event seems rather anti-climactic to me. Waiting on 64 bit support for the Java and Flash plug-ins for FireFox was probably a concern.
Anyhow, cheers!
|
I think the timing is about right IMO, if there is such a thing. It's only recently that I've considered throwing on a 64 bit version of linux as 'preferred' all things considered. It's climactic to me solely because it's Slackware which was already fast on my machine in 32 bit.
|
|
|
|
05-25-2009, 08:59 PM
|
#244
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2007
Posts: 253
Rep:
|
One more item: Go with a "pure" 64 bit librarian like BW64. Yes, some additional libraries are need to support 32 bit programs, but the quantity of 32 bit only programs is shrinking all the time.
Last edited by tpreitzel; 05-25-2009 at 09:00 PM.
|
|
|
|
05-25-2009, 09:27 PM
|
#245
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cochise County, Arizona
Distribution: Gentoo-AMD64 / Slackware64-Current
Posts: 474
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by joutlancpa
I think the timing is about right IMO, if there is such a thing. It's only recently that I've considered throwing on a 64 bit version of linux as 'preferred' all things considered. It's climactic to me solely because it's Slackware which was already fast on my machine in 32 bit.
|
It seems like many Slackware users are like monks who have taken an oath of poverty. Most of whom follow the lethargic edicts of their anointed bishop. The fact that most are using machines that run adequately with software that was delivered years ago, only speaks to the technological aptitude and intellectual currency of many users.
I have tried to keep the best machines running in my environment at all times. Consequently, I have things that some who are content with yesterday's technology, simply drool over. I guess some of you will finally have to step out of the dark ages, abandon your caves and consider a new reality.
Welcome to the future.
Shingoshi
>=(o_O)=>
Last edited by Shingoshi; 05-25-2009 at 09:29 PM.
|
|
|
|
05-25-2009, 09:37 PM
|
#246
|
|
Slackware Contributor
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Tuscaloosa, Alabama (USA)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,894
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shingoshi
I guess some of you will finally have to step out of the dark ages, abandon your caves and consider a new reality.
|
Only if you promise to go back under your bridge...
Is it troll season there yet?
|
|
|
|
05-25-2009, 09:50 PM
|
#247
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Fountain Valley, CA / Thailand
Distribution: Slackware64® 14.0
Posts: 976
Rep:
|
That dude from Oregon is an arrogant prick................
|
|
|
|
05-25-2009, 10:20 PM
|
#248
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Distribution: Slackware ....that's all besides Salix and Porteus
Posts: 528
Rep:
|
Quote:
|
I have tried to keep the best machines running in my environment at all times
|
You just keep on trying son, and the next time someone stops by and drools all over your floor be carefull that you don't slip in it.......;^)
Last edited by justwantin; 05-25-2009 at 10:34 PM.
Reason: tyops
|
|
|
|
05-25-2009, 10:46 PM
|
#249
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 3,645
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shingoshi
It seems like many Slackware users are like monks who have taken an oath of poverty. Most of whom follow the lethargic edicts of their anointed bishop. The fact that most are using machines that run adequately with software that was delivered years ago, only speaks to the technological aptitude and intellectual currency of many users.
I have tried to keep the best machines running in my environment at all times. Consequently, I have things that some who are content with yesterday's technology, simply drool over. I guess some of you will finally have to step out of the dark ages, abandon your caves and consider a new reality.
Welcome to the future.
Shingoshi
>=(o_O)=>
|
I'm scratching my head trying to understand what you are trying to accomplish with your posts. I think that you should consider re-compiling your personality. 
|
|
|
|
05-25-2009, 10:49 PM
|
#250
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Kentucky
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,334
Rep: 
|
Shingosi -
Linux is about choice. Slackware is just one of many choices. I use Slackware because it makes further choices a lot easier. I don't always do things the standard Slackware way. I don't always use a slackbuild or pre-built package. Sometimes there aren't any. Slackware provides me with a sane environment to build it the way I want. I may put things in /opt for example.
My choice - my machine. Can you wrap your mind around this concept of choice? Following this thread, I see that you have made a lot of changes for multilib capability, and that's great! Others have benefited as well, and that's great also! What the hell is your beef anyway?
For me, I'm staying pure 64 bit. If I need something that ain't there, I will compile it.
Move a little farther North to Redmond if you are looking for everything in one spot. Maybe they can fill your need.
To the Slackware Team:
I am currently running Slackware64-current as of 2009-22-05. I actually re-partitioned my drive and totally started over with a new scheme. Slackware64 is now my main production machine and running perfectly. I still have a lot of work to do compiling some old favorites, but I'm just doing it as I need it. This KDE 4x is taking some time getting used to, so I haven't been in a hurry. I did switch to the classic menu, the new one was bugging the heck out of me.
The first thing I did was compile a custom kernel for my machine, which only took minutes, (I went and got a cup of coffee, then came back) then installed the nvidia amd_64 driver. Works great!
The whole system is fast, stable, and so far Slackware reliable. That's the trust I have in the Slackware Team - running -current for production. I know its user beware, but I just couldn't wait any longer.
Thanks again to all, and to all the Forum members that take time out to help others.
|
|
|
|
05-26-2009, 12:21 AM
|
#251
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Pisa, Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,933
|
from now's changelog:
Code:
d/binutils-2.18.50.0.9-x86_64-2.txz: Changes to enable multilib support.
Thanks to Fred Emmott.
d/gcc-4.3.3-x86_64-4.txz: Changes in specs file to enable multilib support.
Thanks to Fred Emmott.
d/gcc-g++-4.3.3-x86_64-4.txz: Recompiled.
d/gcc-gfortran-4.3.3-x86_64-4.txz: Recompiled.
d/gcc-gnat-4.3.3-x86_64-4.txz: Recompiled.
d/gcc-java-4.3.3-x86_64-4.txz: Recompiled.
d/gcc-objc-4.3.3-x86_64-4.txz: Recompiled.

|
|
|
|
05-26-2009, 12:47 AM
|
#252
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: in a fallen world
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 22,902
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shingoshi
It seems like many Slackware users are like monks who have taken an oath of poverty. Most of whom follow the lethargic edicts of their anointed bishop. The fact that most are using machines that run adequately with software that was delivered years ago, only speaks to the technological aptitude and intellectual currency of many users.
I have tried to keep the best machines running in my environment at all times. Consequently, I have things that some who are content with yesterday's technology, simply drool over. I guess some of you will finally have to step out of the dark ages, abandon your caves and consider a new reality.
Welcome to the future.
Shingoshi
>=(o_O)=>
|
Look, kid, just because you've bravely been waving the
banner of consumerism in the IT department of your mall
doesn't mean that you have the right to tell others what
they're supposed to be doing with their money, or have
the right to verbally abuse them. As far as I'm concerned
you're the retard, because you have to/choose to keep
up with the Joneses ...
Cheers,
Tink
P.S.: Btw, I've read your profile btw, I don't care whether
you're a few years older than me or whether you made that
age up, you're still acting like a kid.
Last edited by Tinkster; 05-26-2009 at 12:50 AM.
Reason: added p.s.
|
|
|
|
05-26-2009, 12:56 AM
|
#253
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2007
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 147
Rep:
|
It's actually nice for some binaries only files.
I have an Epson C1100 printer with a Linux driver provided by Avasys. It includes a 32-bits binary file that generate the code for the printer. I managed to make it work by copying manually some libs in /lib (after a "ldd" command to se what was needed. But having a properly supported system is nicer.
And having the possibility to run wine and Acrobat Reader is nice, as I have some files that I need to print regularly which are not rendered well by open-source PDF readers for some reason.
I was prepared to keep a 32-bits system to do those things (which is perfectly OK, I don't have machine with more than 4GB RAM and I don't expect much speedup from a 64bits system) but if it goes multilib, all the better.
My thanks anyway to the Slack team for this superb OS.
BTW, it could be nice to upgrade Mesa a bit. :-)
After my upgrade, compositing in KDE seemed to go haywire with my old ATI card (9200) while it worked perfectly in 32-bits. After some time recompiling KDE, Qt, etc, I suddenly realized that Mesa was in 7.0.X version.
After compiling xorg-server 1.5.3, mesa 7.4.2, the 6.12.2 version of the ATI driver and some input drivers, all was well. Pfiou!
Well, I suppose the Slack is waiting for a new Xorg official release.
Well, cheers!
|
|
|
|
05-26-2009, 02:12 AM
|
#254
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Distribution: Slackware 13.37, Pardus 2011.2
Posts: 884
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tpreitzel
Yawn ....
Pat, a 64 bit version would have been REAL news about 3 to 4 YEARS ago!
|
A 64 bit distro back then would have been "experimental" at best. Some critical software like Flash lacked 64 bit support 4 years ago. That's not the quality expected from Slackware. It's like the KDE 4 transition, no need to be the early bird -- those who want to see what the bleeding edge looks like can always try some other distributions.
Last edited by Ilgar; 05-26-2009 at 02:52 AM.
|
|
|
|
05-26-2009, 02:52 AM
|
#255
|
|
Slackware Contributor
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,677
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shingoshi
It seems like many Slackware users are like monks who have taken an oath of poverty. Most of whom follow the lethargic edicts of their anointed bishop. The fact that most are using machines that run adequately with software that was delivered years ago, only speaks to the technological aptitude and intellectual currency of many users.
I have tried to keep the best machines running in my environment at all times. Consequently, I have things that some who are content with yesterday's technology, simply drool over. I guess some of you will finally have to step out of the dark ages, abandon your caves and consider a new reality.
Welcome to the future.
Shingoshi
>=(o_O)=>
|
Thanks for showing so perfectly what kind of mentality is behind all those FUD posts you made the last week.
Eric
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|