LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 12-05-2010, 12:14 PM   #1
user100
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2010
Posts: 64

Rep: Reputation: 0
Slackware64 13.1 no smp kernel?


Hi,

I have downloaded several Slackware64 13.1 DVDs from several sources and found that all have the smp kernel missing somehow? Is this intentional or... ?

The regular I guess 32bit does have it though.


Thanks.
 
Old 12-05-2010, 12:21 PM   #2
volkerdi
Slackware Maintainer
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Minnesota
Distribution: Slackware! :-)
Posts: 858

Rep: Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668
Since there are no known SMP broken x86_64 machines (unlike x86), all the Slackware64 kernels are SMP capable.
 
Old 12-05-2010, 12:23 PM   #3
kapz
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: kernel space
Distribution: Slackware_x64
Posts: 191

Rep: Reputation: 16
Quote:
I have downloaded several Slackware64 13.1 DVDs from several sources
Seriously?

Anyways, no SMP is NOT disabled. How did you find out that SMP is disabled? If just by name then that's not the case.

Not that it's required but you can always recompile your kernel to meet your needs(it just sounds much work, but actually it's not) besides slackware likes a knowledgeable(or willing to learn) user.

Last edited by kapz; 12-05-2010 at 12:25 PM.
 
Old 12-05-2010, 12:52 PM   #4
user100
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2010
Posts: 64

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Well it surprised me.

Almost went by unnoticed but when I was working with the boot loader I noticed it doesn't load the hugesmp.s kernel, tried to change it to to load it but than "file was missing". So after some more digging I found that it isn't even on the disk. So I wondered what happened to it.

But did I download some bad disks or is it missing? I just got them from slackware.org/getslack some UK, USA and France servers I tried. But I think all of them are missing the hugesmp.s kernel. Kinda weird though.

But if it is missing how do I recompile the kernel or add it to it?
 
Old 12-05-2010, 01:10 PM   #5
volkerdi
Slackware Maintainer
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Minnesota
Distribution: Slackware! :-)
Posts: 858

Rep: Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668
Again, on Slackware64 the huge.s kernel _is_ an SMP kernel. So are generic.s and speakup.s.

Try "uname -a" and you will see SMP.
 
Old 12-05-2010, 01:50 PM   #6
kapz
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: kernel space
Distribution: Slackware_x64
Posts: 191

Rep: Reputation: 16
Quote:
Well it surprised me.

Almost went by unnoticed but when I was working with the boot loader I noticed it doesn't load the hugesmp.s kernel, tried to change it to to load it but than "file was missing". So after some more digging I found that it isn't even on the disk. So I wondered what happened to it.
And consider yourself effin *LUCKY* that volkerdi replied to your thread!!

Now to the point, what do you mean that "hugesmp.s" doesn't load??
Also please specify in detail how you tried to load it?
 
Old 12-05-2010, 02:04 PM   #7
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,195

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by kapz View Post
what do you mean that "hugesmp.s" doesn't load??
He probably typed "hugesmp.s" explicitly on the commandline instead of just pressing ENTER to accept the default (huge.s)

Eric
 
Old 12-05-2010, 02:04 PM   #8
Richard Cranium
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Carrollton, Texas
Distribution: Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 1,443

Rep: Reputation: 409Reputation: 409Reputation: 409Reputation: 409Reputation: 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by kapz View Post
Now to the point, what do you mean that "hugesmp.s" doesn't load??
Well, it doesn't exist at all on Slackware64 so it isn't much of a surprise that it wouldn't load there.
 
Old 12-05-2010, 02:10 PM   #9
user100
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2010
Posts: 64

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Ok well running "uname -a" it says Linux kernel 2.6.33.4 SMP so I guess it uses it.

So I guess the name has been changed to huge.s which includes smp?

If I load the normal 32bit DVD it will say default hugesmp.s as kernel, that is why I asked. Running the 64bit disk it will only say huge.s and not any mention of smp.

It doesn't load because there is no hugesmp.s file and no kernel. Try it.

But if it loads it included in huge.s, I guess its fine.
 
Old 12-05-2010, 02:46 PM   #10
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 11,061
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 1374Reputation: 1374Reputation: 1374Reputation: 1374Reputation: 1374Reputation: 1374Reputation: 1374Reputation: 1374Reputation: 1374Reputation: 1374
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by user100 View Post
Ok well running "uname -a" it says Linux kernel 2.6.33.4 SMP so I guess it uses it.

So I guess the name has been changed to huge.s which includes smp?

If I load the normal 32bit DVD it will say default hugesmp.s as kernel, that is why I asked. Running the 64bit disk it will only say huge.s and not any mention of smp.

It doesn't load because there is no hugesmp.s file and no kernel. Try it.

But if it loads it included in huge.s, I guess its fine.
Do you read the reply's to your queries? You got direct answers from volkerdi & Alien_Bob.
From the horse's mouth!

There's no need to have another kernel;
Quote:
Originally Posted by volkerdi View Post
Again, on Slackware64 the huge.s kernel _is_ an SMP kernel. So are generic.s and speakup.s.

Try "uname -a" and you will see SMP.
The above quote and reply to you is from the Slackware Maintainer/Creator.
 
Old 12-05-2010, 02:56 PM   #11
kapz
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: kernel space
Distribution: Slackware_x64
Posts: 191

Rep: Reputation: 16
hah...srriously are you a troll? user100?

If not, then please read LQ Slackware topics and the web. And if you are a bot(which I think you are) then buzz off.............Please for the love of slack.
 
Old 12-05-2010, 02:59 PM   #12
volkerdi
Slackware Maintainer
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Minnesota
Distribution: Slackware! :-)
Posts: 858

Rep: Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668Reputation: 1668
It struck me as an honest question from someone who, at the time, had just as many posts on LQ as me.
 
Old 12-05-2010, 03:10 PM   #13
kapz
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: kernel space
Distribution: Slackware_x64
Posts: 191

Rep: Reputation: 16
Slack GOD:
Quote:
It struck me as an honest question from someone who, at the time, had just as many posts on LQ as me
Well Pat I think ur jst pullin our leg or something like that

I mean how does someone explain something like this with any kind of experience from slack DVD:

Quote:
Almost went by unnoticed but when I was working with the boot loader I noticed it doesn't load the hugesmp.s kernel
 
Old 12-05-2010, 03:43 PM   #14
T3slider
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-14.1
Posts: 2,244

Rep: Reputation: 622Reputation: 622Reputation: 622Reputation: 622Reputation: 622Reputation: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by kapz View Post
Slack GOD:

Well Pat I think ur jst pullin our leg or something like that

I mean how does someone explain something like this with any kind of experience from slack DVD:
I think you're being a little harsh. The 64-bit DVD still does reference the generic-smp and huge-smp kernels in CHANGES_AND_HINTS.TXT, for example (since the files are synchronized with 32-bit Slackware), and when I first installed 13.0 after being used to specifying -smp I noticed it as well (and probably ran `uname -a` after booting to make sure it was indeed SMP-enabled).
 
Old 12-05-2010, 04:05 PM   #15
kapz
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: kernel space
Distribution: Slackware_x64
Posts: 191

Rep: Reputation: 16
Quote:
I think you're being a little harsh.
Definitely I don't wanna sound harsh!

After booting in the default kernel of live dvd, you can can always find that out about the kernel!
Anyways if i sound harsh then I don't intend to be.

cheers,
kapz
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] No SMP kernel for Slackware64 install? delta_waves Slackware 4 02-22-2010 01:54 PM
Upgrading a slackware 12.1 kernel (2.6.24.5-smp) to a 13 kernel (2.6.29.6-smp) f.y Linux - Kernel 3 12-09-2009 01:15 PM
Non-SMP kernel modules for SMP kernel: Best practice? gargamel Slackware 9 12-29-2008 01:13 PM
Hyperthread server goes to kernel panic with SMP kernic, boots ok with non SMP kernel abefroman Linux - Kernel 1 09-15-2006 05:43 PM
Any reason to keep a non-smp kernel installed on a smp FC3 machine? jim-j Fedora 2 03-12-2006 07:06 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration