SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am putting togerther a web server and a DNS server on a seperate box. Currently they are running FreeBSD. I am looking at different Linux Dirstros, trying to decide what might be better to use. I have noticed that most people on this discussion board use Slackware. Is Slackware a good Server Distro or is it better for Desktop/Workstation. How is Security and is it easy to keep updated? What do major corporations use? It looks like Redhat is one of the Top Enterprise Servers. Does Slackware compare in speed and stability? Or should I just stay with FreeBSD?
Thanks.
Most of us that use slackware do so for the same reasons that you just mentioned, speed, stability, ease of use. For me, most of the so called 'professional' distro's are more difficult to administer because the stray from many of the given UNIX standards. For a basic server (file/web/POP3/DNS/DHCP) slackware will perform as good if not better than any of the other distro's out there, and given your familiarity with BSD I think you will find administration easy.
Distribution: debian (when I can) RHEL (when I must)
Posts: 98
Rep:
Well, the nifty thing about slackware is that it contains packages pretty much in their vanilla form, they haven't been modified to fit into the distrobution. To answer your qestion, it makes as good a server or as good a destop as you want it to be, because you're going to be the one setting it up. It the same with security. When major security flaws are are found in supported aplications, pat is usualy pretty quick in coming up with new packages, though there is no automatic update of any kind. It's up to you to keep up with any security issues that migh occour with packages you have installed and install the fixes yourself. The automatic updates available for other distrobutions are a strong selling point for many enterprise users.
As far as speed and stability goes, I've never used anything that compares with slack. It's so minimalistic that there is little cruft to become unstable and/or slow things down.
Slackware is an awesome server distro. Apache (w/ mod_ssl and mod_php), sendmail, mysql, proftpd, bind, ssh... they all work with minimal configuration. As was mentioned, the packages are all in their vanilla form, which helps eliminate unknowns when you're tracking down problems. Also, since Slack uses BSD-style inits (instead of SysV), you'll find that administering it is ridiculously easy.
Slackware's goal is to be the most UNIX-like Linux distro - and it does a very good job at that. I highly recommend it.
Originally posted by tbayer I am putting togerther a web server and a DNS server on a seperate box. Currently they are running FreeBSD. I am looking at different Linux Dirstros, trying to decide what might be better to use. I have noticed that most people on this discussion board use Slackware. Is Slackware a good Server Distro or is it better for Desktop/Workstation. How is Security and is it easy to keep updated? What do major corporations use? It looks like Redhat is one of the Top Enterprise Servers. Does Slackware compare in speed and stability? Or should I just stay with FreeBSD?
Thanks.
If FreeBSD does what you want stick with it.
You'd probably miss ports here, too :}
From what I understand gentoo's emerge
should be the Linux equivalent of ports.
I can't offer you a direct comparison of
Slack and BSD since I've never used BSD.
Slack, however, is a very mature and lightweight
distro that's more tailored towards security than
the mainstream distros that made simplicity their
primary target (just look at permissions on sound
devices, for instance). It's hardened much easier
than Mandreck for instance.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.