SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
as I have just received my new hardware, Intel Core 2 Duo based, with 8GB of RAM, I would like to know, what the best option to run Slackware on it, is.
Options seem to be
Original Slackware 32-bit, but with 64GB support in the kernel
This is my first 64-bit hardware, so I don't have any experience with it. What would you recommend? And why?
Please note: I am aware that there's still a lack of 64-bit programs; for all the stuff I want to use there are 64-bit versions available, however, so that doesn't bother me. More important: Do security fixes appear timely for SLAMD64? Is this "unofficial" port maintained as well as the original?
I'm asking, because I found that the latest MySQL patch for Slackware 12.0 is not mentioned in the list of SLAMD64 security patches.
There is no guarantee on Slamd64 security patches - generally, Fred will try and push these as fast as possible, however, Slamd64 is not a full time job for him, so we can't promise that 'fix X will be available within Y days after Slackware releases it.'
As for what to recommend - I've always run Slamd64 on all my x86-64 boxes, so I'm somewhat biased on the point (however, I suppose for me it's a case of - well, I paid for a 64 bit processor, let's see what it can do).
You can use either. However, there are certain issues that may give you problems in x64, such as flash player and some programs that have not or cannot be ported to x64. If you don't care about these, then go on and try it.
You can also try bluewhite64, it seems to release security updates considerably faster than slamd64 (if these are important to you).
Using flash under x86_64 isn't a hardship if you use a 32-bit browser; and that's easily accomplished by installing the slackware (not slamd64) package of firefox (for example). The program list is identical unless you're stuck with binary-only versions, or a pretty old codebase.
Bear in mind, too, that the same slackbuild scripts can be used to build the missing pieces of your software, usually with only very minor modification (and in most cases, simply setting the ARCH is enough to cause the necessary changes). Also, src2pkg is good for this
Political issues aside: BW64 is mono-arch, so you will be unable to throw in 32-bit packages/binaries without extra work.
Regarding Bluewhite64: I've read something not overly nice about the history of that distribution, being based on Slamd64 roots, but not giving the credits to Fred Emmott, it seems.
More important to me (you mentioned it): Slamd64 is the only multilib port of Slackware, ie it can run 32 and 64 bit software.
Security fixes: Yes, I regard them highly important! I have, of course, every understanding that one man cannot do all the work. But as I've read the statement that Fred Emmott is looking for a job, I'd be interested to know, if the maintenance of Slamd64 is ensured, and if there are people ready to take over, should Fred not be available due to new occupation.
What I want to do with the new system: I want it to be my media centre, especially for everything that has to do with music. I want to use it for midi recording, archiving vinyl records and CDs, sound processing and so on.
Any further recommendations/tips/hints, are most welcome! Thanks!