Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
|
View Poll Results: How would you describe the new Slackware logo?
|
|
Fantastic
|
  
|
16 |
10.32% |
|
Great
|
  
|
21 |
13.55% |
|
So so
|
  
|
39 |
25.16% |
|
Ugly
|
  
|
32 |
20.65% |
|
Ugly'd be a compliment
|
  
|
47 |
30.32% |
 |
|
09-16-2008, 08:13 PM
|
#61
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Scotland
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS everywhere
Posts: 218
Rep:
|
I agree with everything slackhack has written, he's clearly talking sense based on experience. At the time of writing, 50% think the new logo is ugly or close to, 74% don't generally like it, 26% do. I admire Alien Bob's determined rearguard actions but the fact remains that a large proportion of the user base don't like it.
While I accept Xavier's point in part, I'd like to return to the previous situation where we didn't have disagreements about logos. If I may repeat my view, I consider it amateurish in appearance, its employment a profound error of judgement and frankly embarrassing. The sooner it is dispensed with the better, for all the sensible business, brand and marketing reasons adduced in this and other threads.
I'm not aware that anyone has heard from PV in regard to this subject, but if he is reading these threads or if I had his ear as some here surely do, I'd advise him to listen to his customer base, gracefully admit that "slamwars" was a mistake and then either reinstate the old logo, or if a new one is required, give slackhack or someone like him a call for advice.
And as Adriv says, the fact that so many of us are banging on about this apparently trivial subject is testament to the excellence of Slackware - apart from the logo that is.
|
|
|
|
09-16-2008, 09:54 PM
|
#62
|
|
Guru
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 5,818
|
While the issue itself is of very little importance to me (indeed, I didn't even know about the new logo until I saw the topics on the boards), my personal opinion would have to be that the logo is just horrendous.
It looks like the kind of thing you would find on a $5 T-shirt at a souvenir stand. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if that was the genesis for it. Pat was taking some time off this summer, saw one of these flipped logos on the boardwalk, and paid an artist that does them exclusively (was anyone else even aware there was a market for this?) to do one for Slack.
Which would have been all well and good if it was just a joke or a one-off thing, but I can't fathom the thought process that brought him to this point. The original Slackware logo was incredibly classy and simplistic, which says a lot in the modern Linux arena. It really meant something, because just like the distribution itself, the logo was still the same elegant design it has been for years; it wasn't caught up in the mad rush to make Linux something the trendy 20-somethings can identify with. Leave that to Ubuntu and it's zoo full of release names. Ah well.
|
|
|
|
09-17-2008, 06:25 AM
|
#63
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 1,735
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkpw
I admire Alien Bob's determined rearguard actions but the fact remains that a large proportion of the user base don't like it.
|
I would like to respectfully ask how you could substantiate such a claim?
Did you ever stop to think that *perhaps* the largest portion of Slackware's user base are not members of this site?
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkpw
If I may repeat my view, I consider it amateurish in appearance, its employment a profound error of judgement and frankly embarrassing. The sooner it is dispensed with the better, for all the sensible business, brand and marketing reasons adduced in this and other threads.
|
Embarrassing to who exactly?
Do you have a Slackware sticker on your car? Do you own any Slackware merchandise? Do you own anything with the new logo on it? And if so, have people made derogatory comments about it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkpw
I'm not aware that anyone has heard from PV in regard to this subject, but if he is reading these threads or if I had his ear as some here surely do, I'd advise him to listen to his customer base, gracefully admit that "slamwars" was a mistake and then either reinstate the old logo, or if a new one is required, give slackhack or someone like him a call for advice.
|
Of course, you do realise that the new logo was designed by a professional, right?
One thing's for sure, if I was PV, right now I'd be saying "stuff 'em, it's staying right where it is..."
If sales were to fall drastically, then it'd be different. Who cares if it's just the freeloaders that are making all this noise?
Last edited by rkelsen; 09-17-2008 at 06:30 AM.
|
|
|
|
09-17-2008, 07:06 AM
|
#64
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541
Rep:
|
Did slack come out with an EULA that requires every user to tattoo the logo on their forehead or what is the buzz all about?
With all the distros I used the tattoo (erm: logo) was my smallest concern.
|
|
|
|
09-17-2008, 08:24 AM
|
#65
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: Arch, Debian, Slack
Posts: 1,016
Rep:
|
logo and design discussion post - moved here.
Last edited by slackhack; 09-17-2008 at 10:35 AM.
|
|
|
|
09-17-2008, 08:39 AM
|
#66
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2006
Posts: 3
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob
It amazes me to see how people write their first post just to inform the world that they do not like a logo... as if Slackware - the distro you use - is not more important to comment on than a mere logo...
Eric
|
Alien Bob, sorry if i offend you. This was not my intention.
I like the Slackware distro so much and i just said that i didn't like the logo. I didn't say that the distro is bad !!!
I think that the logo is very important for any product.
Quote:
Originally Posted by keefaz
Yeah, this poll is flawed, the results are not meaningful, some voted more than one time with new accounts. It should be re-done with a limited access to linuxquestions.org users with a >100 posts number

|
keefaz, i am a really person and your idea is terrible!
|
|
|
|
09-17-2008, 09:31 AM
|
#67
|
|
Guru
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,707
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by slackhack
If I were redesigning the logo, I therefore would probably do something like in this rough sketch (done last night on laptop, not very precise, would need adjusting, aligning, etc.) -- but just to give a general idea:
http://datalink.homelinux.com/slogo/..._logo-barz.png
Here, the already-strong slackware name ID is preserved, but instead of detracting from it by having "linux" in the same typewriter font, the word "slackware" now stands out more and is in fact *underscored* by the strong block underneath..
|
That's pretty cool, I like it.
So far, I think nearly every logo submitted is better than the current Slackware logo.
EDIT: Hmm, shouldn't you have posted this in the other thread ?
Last edited by H_TeXMeX_H; 09-17-2008 at 09:33 AM.
|
|
|
|
09-17-2008, 09:38 AM
|
#68
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: Arch, Debian, Slack
Posts: 1,016
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H
That's pretty cool, I like it.
So far, I think nearly every logo submitted is better than the current Slackware logo.
|
agree.
Quote:
|
EDIT: Hmm, shouldn't you have posted this in the other thread ?
|
is there another one? apologies. point me to it and I'll delete this one and move it there (or maybe a mod could do it). cheers.
>> edit: okay, I found the other thread. post moved
Last edited by slackhack; 09-17-2008 at 10:36 AM.
|
|
|
|
09-17-2008, 09:44 AM
|
#69
|
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Laptop: Slackware 14.0 // Desktop: Slackware64 14.0 // Netbook: Slackware 14.0
Posts: 6,196
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkelsen
If sales were to fall drastically, then it'd be different. Who cares if it's just the freeloaders that are making all this noise?
|
Is that a quote from Steve Ballmer? Certainly not the sort of thing I'd expect from a user of GNU/Linux.
|
|
|
|
09-17-2008, 10:05 AM
|
#70
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 2,878
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H
That's pretty cool, I like it.
|
So do I.
Nice work slackhack, with both your logo design and with the insightful post that accompanied it.
|
|
|
|
09-17-2008, 10:13 AM
|
#71
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,282
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by m.e.g.s
keefaz, i am a really person and your idea is terrible!
|
Maybe a real person with multiple identities ?
BTW how did you hack the forum registration date for your account?

|
|
|
|
09-18-2008, 06:18 AM
|
#72
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 1,735
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H
So far, I think nearly every logo submitted is better than the current Slackware logo.
|
But none of them have any near as much character.
Why does everyone seem to think that Slackware has to have a boring logo???
|
|
|
|
09-18-2008, 07:25 AM
|
#73
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 2,878
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkelsen
But none of them have any near as much character.
Why does everyone seem to think that Slackware has to have a boring logo???
|
I don't.
Slackware's 'character' is simple and elegant. The old logo reflected this. I never found the old one boring in any way.
In contrast, the new logo's character is contorted and for the most part unintelligible.
It reads 'slackware' if you look at it while doing a one armed handstand while squinting with one eye through a pair of 40% tinted glasses at 11pm on the night of a 1/4 moon with a 20% cloud covering at a latitude somewhere close to Edinborough! The rest of the time it reads 'slamwars'.
I do like the old logo, but I'm not against changing it for something else.
It's just that I really, really, hate this particular logo. As I said previously in one of these threads, I think the designer of this logo did incredibly well to make any sort of ambigram at all out of the letters in 'Slackware'. I just feel that the sequence of letters doesn't lend itself well to the task and he'd never get it to look right no matter how hard he tried.
At the end of the day, this is just my personal opinion and doesn't count for much. I just wanted to address the point you raised about people being opposed to any new/interesting logo at all. I honestly don't think that's the case.
|
|
|
|
09-18-2008, 07:33 AM
|
#74
|
|
Guru
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,707
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkelsen
But none of them have any near as much character.
Why does everyone seem to think that Slackware has to have a boring logo???
|
Sorry, but there's absolutely nothing exciting about the new logo, nope, nothing at all. The only excitement I can think of was the shot of adrenaline I got when I first saw it, thinking to myself "Holy s*** wtf is that ?!?!?". Yes, that was the only excitement I got from it, and it was a one time thing.
|
|
|
|
09-18-2008, 07:52 AM
|
#75
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 384
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H
The only excitement I can think of was the shot of adrenaline I got when I first saw it, thinking to myself "Holy s*** wtf is that ?!?!?". Yes, that was the only excitement I got from it, and it was a one time thing.
|
Exactly
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rkelsen
Why does everyone seem to think that Slackware has to have a boring logo???
|
Noone here thinks Slackware has to have a boring logo. The consensus here
seems to be that Slackware should have a good logo. And definitely not the one this new slackwars linux distribution is using.
It's amazing how much this new logo is being disapproved of. Still about 50% of the voters completely dislike it. Add the "So,so" voters right now and you have 75% against it. Now that should be clear.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|