SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Originally posted by jong357 Discs 1 and 2 are for the install and discs 3 and 4 is the source code.... You already answered your own question...
You don't NEED the source code to install. Just the binaries. Discs 1 and 2 are just the binaries.
And if you're really hard-core, you only need disk 1, because all that's on disk 2 is GNOME and KDE, so if you're setting up a basic server that doesn't need a GUI, or you're only interested in a window manager and not a desktop environment, you can get by with only one CD.
Discs 3 and 4 exist because the GPL and LGPL require that the source code be included with any binary distribution of software. Since Slackware's package system is a binary method of distribution, largely for 3rd party apps distributed under GPL and LGPL (and in some cases BSD or MIT), the source has to be available.
You don't need discs 3 or 4. They're just there because Pat has to make that stuff available. (though an interesting side-note... KDE runs a whole lot faster if you compile it yourself, because you have the option of going through the code and getting rid of all of the errors to stdout. You simply don't need all of that reporting to stdout, especially in runlevel 4, because you're never going to see them anyway.)
Originally posted by killerbob (though an interesting side-note... KDE runs a whole lot faster if you compile it yourself, because you have the option of going through the code and getting rid of all of the errors to stdout. You simply don't need all of that reporting to stdout, especially in runlevel 4, because you're never going to see them anyway.)
Personally I only used disk 1, although I didn't realise that the others had the decent GUIs on at the time, but this resulted in me only having Dropline Gnome and a set of really basic GUIs, which i think was probably best. My advice is to install the first disk and then set up your internet connection on one of the basic GUIs (I used darkbox or something like that) and then get the dropline gnome installer from http://www.dropline.net/gnome/files/...9-i686-4dl.tgz
use installpkg and then... well... wait.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.