LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-22-2009, 03:54 PM   #16
samac
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Kirkwall, Orkney
Distribution: Linux Mint 20.3 - Cinnamon
Posts: 1,425

Rep: Reputation: 139Reputation: 139

Hard drives always hold back your cpu. With 6GB ram you should try the old fashioned trick of creating a ramdisk and loading your Slackware into it. If it made at atari fly I would imagine it would make slackware stratospheric.

samac
 
Old 07-22-2009, 07:06 PM   #17
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 13,923
Blog Entries: 44

Rep: Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158
Hi,

You could just get a ramdisk card. I've used those for years. The memory technology allows one to utilize the newer chips available. No issues with writes and the newer units have backup abilities. Still rather expensive for the average user but beats the issue with 'SSD'.
 
Old 07-23-2009, 12:48 AM   #18
acummings
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 615

Rep: Reputation: 50
Hi,

FWIW. (powers KVM with Windows 7 rather nicely / quick) For a while now:

Slackware 12.2 with hugemem support compiled in; Asus P5Q Pro motherboard; 8 GB DDR2 ram; 750 GB sata II HD; ATI Radeon PCI-E

Marvell IDE controller (KDE daemon or whatever don't like that controller (pata DVD burner) (sometimes burns cd's ok when X has not been started (can't burn when through / in X) -- I burn on another box, haven't yet resolved on this box

That and the ATI are my *only* beefs (ATI works good with 9.3 catalyst for me (but, oh the kernel compiling, etc. before I got there)

I've a 3 speed 120 mm fan on low speed -- it draws from near the back side of my HD while it blows (upward and rear ward in case) at an angle at the motherboard chipsets and the ATI heatsink and also just gets / cools the DDR2 ram as well.

Guess I'll try open radeon at next release of Slackware. If needed, I'll get me an Nvidia or other PCI-E video.

Code:
al@P5Q:/mnt/sda_8/virtmach$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 15
model name      : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     E6750  @ 2.66GHz
stepping        : 11
cpu MHz         : 2666.287
cache size      : 4096 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 2
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 2
apicid          : 0
initial apicid  : 0
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 10
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm lahf_lm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority
bogomips        : 5332.57
clflush size    : 64
power management:

processor       : 1
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 15
model name      : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     E6750  @ 2.66GHz
stepping        : 11
cpu MHz         : 2666.287
cache size      : 4096 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 2
core id         : 1
cpu cores       : 2
apicid          : 1
initial apicid  : 1
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 10
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm lahf_lm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority
bogomips        : 5332.65
clflush size    : 64
power management:

al@P5Q:/mnt/sda_8/virtmach$
Windows 7 runs relatively fast in KVM virtual machine

qemu-system-x86_64 -hda ~/2vm/win7_077_0404.img -m 1850 -localtime

al@P5Q:/mnt/sda_8/virtmach$ lsg .img
win7_068_0321.img
win7_077_0404.img
win7beta.img
win95b.img
windows95_boot_disk.img
winxpsp3.img
al@P5Q:/mnt/sda_8/virtmach$

--
Alan.
 
Old 07-23-2009, 02:36 AM   #19
GazL
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 6,897

Rep: Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018
Quote:
Originally Posted by samac View Post
Hard drives always hold back your cpu. With 6GB ram you should try the old fashioned trick of creating a ramdisk and loading your Slackware into it. If it made at atari fly I would imagine it would make slackware stratospheric.

samac
With 6Gb ram, wouldn't the disk cache pretty much cover 99% of what you'll be accessing anyway? (obviously it'll have to read it in the first time but once it's in it should be pretty snappy).

I can see why you might want to put /tmp or other heavily used workspace on a ramdisk (either software based, or hardware as onebuck suggested), but is there really any advantage to copying /usr or other read only data on there when the linux filesystem cache will be doing it's thing?

Here's another question I just thought off. Is the kernel intelligent enough to not cache stuff on tmpfs filesystems or do you have to tell it to ignore them?
 
Old 07-23-2009, 02:48 AM   #20
samac
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Kirkwall, Orkney
Distribution: Linux Mint 20.3 - Cinnamon
Posts: 1,425

Rep: Reputation: 139Reputation: 139
Quote:
I can see why you might want to put /tmp or other heavily used workspace on a ramdisk (either software based, or hardware as onebuck suggested), but is there really any advantage to copying /usr or other read only data on there when the linux filesystem cache will be doing it's thing?

Here's another question I just thought off. Is the kernel intelligent enough to not cache stuff on tmpfs filesystems or do you have to tell it to ignore them?
I have never tried this so I don't really know the answers to these comments, however I don't see any reason why it wouldn't work, after all several live disk distributions copy everything to ram.

samac
 
Old 07-23-2009, 02:59 AM   #21
GazL
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 6,897

Rep: Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018
Just found this which discusses what I was just asking.

http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7388/1.html
 
Old 07-23-2009, 11:32 AM   #22
Ramurd
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Distribution: Slackwarelinux
Posts: 703

Rep: Reputation: 111Reputation: 111
What above posters have said, especially due to the virtual machines you'll want lots of RAM (4G on the low side I'd say, which will make you go x86_64 come slackware 13.0 probably)
But I don't agree with running nvidia cards. At least not fan-cooled ones, as I no longer dare to keep my computer on while I'm not there, now being on my 4th videocard in about half a year time due to the fan suddenly deciding to quit working. Those things smell funny, I can tell you now... No more nvidia for me anymore, if his one breaks as well I'll try to find something else that's just as well supported (or even better) and go with that.
 
Old 07-23-2009, 11:53 AM   #23
GrapefruiTgirl
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Rep: Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramurd View Post
What above posters have said, especially due to the virtual machines you'll want lots of RAM (4G on the low side I'd say, which will make you go x86_64 come slackware 13.0 probably)
But I don't agree with running nvidia cards. At least not fan-cooled ones, as I no longer dare to keep my computer on while I'm not there, now being on my 4th videocard in about half a year time due to the fan suddenly deciding to quit working. Those things smell funny, I can tell you now... No more nvidia for me anymore, if his one breaks as well I'll try to find something else that's just as well supported (or even better) and go with that.
Despite all else, and that I'm an nVidia user, Ramurd is totally right about the nV GPU fans: they are CRAP CRAP CRAP.
My current cards are passive cooling, but I have been known to rig/modify/attach better quality fans to my video cards (and my northbridge right now too has a 'custom' fan on it a la moi). It's a bit of a home remedy, but it works very well.
 
Old 07-24-2009, 06:07 AM   #24
mjjzf
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Valby, Denmark / Citizen of the Web
Distribution: Slackware 14.1
Posts: 879

Rep: Reputation: 39
Beside a small speed increase, don't SSDs shine more in a netbook?
Besides, I always thought Slackware was an argument not to buy new hardware. I have one of these with 384MB RAM - it just shines and gives me an extremely sweet battery life.
 
Old 07-24-2009, 07:46 AM   #25
tuxrules
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 1,158

Rep: Reputation: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjjzf View Post
I always thought Slackware was an argument not to buy new hardware.
I disagree, I always think Slackware is an argument against planned hardware obsolence, not against buying new hardware. Buying new hardware is always good and sometimes essential to keep up with the times. This doesn't mean we have to ditch things that work

Just my 2
 
Old 07-25-2009, 01:47 AM   #26
TL_CLD
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Posts: 366

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjjzf View Post
Beside a small speed increase, don't SSDs shine more in a netbook?
Besides, I always thought Slackware was an argument not to buy new hardware. I have one of these with 384MB RAM - it just shines and gives me an extremely sweet battery life.
I've found myself using VirtualBox more and more, and it's not rare that I have 3-4 vboxes running concurrently, all the while I'm compiling an Ada program.

This does require a few resources, and I feel my current machine is, well, lacking in that area.

So yea, Slackware will make your hardware last longer, unless you keep increasing the base load of the system, which is what I've done the past few years.


/Thomas
 
Old 07-25-2009, 04:42 AM   #27
GazL
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 6,897

Rep: Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018
If you end up going with intel processors make sure you get one that supports the VT extentions. Virtual box will run much better with them. So, basically avoid the E7xxx and Q8xxx series.

P.S. I have an E7400, but as I don't do much with Virtualisation, it's no great loss to me.

Last edited by GazL; 07-25-2009 at 04:43 AM.
 
Old 07-27-2009, 12:52 AM   #28
acummings
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 615

Rep: Reputation: 50
Hi. I have the Intel E6750 (with VT). E8400 or E8500 Intel would be nice (waiting for cost to come down).

Screams, (E6750) for the most part, with KVM (8 GB ram - Asus P5Q Pro MB, as per my earlier "FWIW" post.

1024 X 768 is max. res. in Windows 7

KVM uses a modified Qemu which in turn emulates an older pci vid. adapter like from the days back when lesser video ram and pci (before AGP).

KVM work good for me, does what I need. I'm not a gamer (obviously).

I've not yet tried virtualbox. (KVM does me - if it ain't broke, don't fix it).

Anyone know/share what virtualbox emulates for video adapter/hardware?

Any other compare / contrast virtualbox versus KVM?

On the strictly virt. mach. topic, a link to another or a new thread might be fine so as not to highjack this (real, not virtual) hardware thread. Thanks.

--
Alan.
 
Old 07-27-2009, 02:23 AM   #29
Cheesesteak
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 102

Rep: Reputation: 24
New hardware changes mind about KDE 4.x

The new power supply for my i7 system came this past Thursday, so I've had a few days to play. It is so choice. If you have the means, I highly recommend picking one up . (Ferris Bueller anyone, anyone?)

I didn't care for KDE 4.x with my 2.4 GHz P4 box, but it's a different story with the i7. It's really too bad you can't get the same feeling on the older hardware... the P4 box will stick to XFCE, which is fine, just more spartan with less eye-candy.

I had thought about setting up a partition and installing MS Windows for games. But after installing Windows 7 RC and playing with it for a short while, a balloon popped up stating that Windows Activation was successful. That crap leaves such a bad taste in my mouth... the thought ended there.

I'm enjoying Slackware64-current, and I can't wait for 13 to go final. Gonna go hog wild and have some fun.
 
Old 07-27-2009, 04:20 AM   #30
TwinReverb
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2008
Location: Misawa AB, Japan
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 191
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 40
Get something with exotic hardware that there's either none or limited support for in Linux, then test out all the development hardware-related software (kernel, etc) you can. 8-)
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Canonical OEM Strategy Deserves Applause LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-11-2008 05:40 AM
LXer: Steve Wozniak: $100 laptop deserves a Nobel Prize LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-04-2008 03:21 AM
Security update and hardware: To Slackware or not to Slackware... Vrajgh Slackware 29 12-04-2007 04:35 PM
Slackware and hardware.... Basslord1124 Slackware 3 03-17-2005 07:50 PM
moved: for the exposure it deserves -giggle titanium_geek General 5 09-18-2004 01:29 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration