LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-02-2009, 06:27 PM   #1
Erik_FL
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Boynton Beach, FL
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 821

Rep: Reputation: 258Reputation: 258Reputation: 258
Slackware 13.1 (maybe with KDE 4.3.4)?


It looks like KDE 4.3.4 may be the last 4.3 bug fix release as KDE 4.4 is coming soon.

I'm wondering if there is any plan yet for a Slackware 13.1 release and if that might occur shortly after the last 4.3 bug fix release. I don't know if KDE 4.3.4 IS the last 4.3 bug fix release but it might be.

Because of the issues in KDE 4.2.4 and the fact that KDE 4.3.3 seems to be more stable and a bit faster, I'm wondering if the next Slackware release might come sooner than usual.

It's hard for me to tell how much better KDE 4.3 is than KDE 4.2 since I had problems with both versions. I'm using KDE 4.2.4 since that was officially released with Slackware 13. Actually I'm mostly using XFCE4 now with some of the KDE applications.
 
Old 12-02-2009, 07:27 PM   #2
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 13,923
Blog Entries: 44

Rep: Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158
Hi,

The old reliable reply; 'It will be released when PV decides Slackware is ready for another release'.

From my point of view there are other things to consider for a release. I'm wondering if there will be a repackaging?

 
Old 12-02-2009, 07:43 PM   #3
cwizardone
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,089

Rep: Reputation: 7263Reputation: 7263Reputation: 7263Reputation: 7263Reputation: 7263Reputation: 7263Reputation: 7263Reputation: 7263Reputation: 7263Reputation: 7263Reputation: 7263
Quote:
Originally Posted by onebuck View Post
...From my point of view there are other things to consider for a release. I'm wondering if there will be a repackaging?
May I ask what you mean by "repackaging"?
Thanks.
 
Old 12-02-2009, 07:46 PM   #4
~sHyLoCk~
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2008
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 1,173
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 129Reputation: 129
Well considering KDE4.3.3 is in -current, we can expect 4.3.4 sometimes in the future. There is no question of 13.1 being out so soon, 13 was just released a while back. I think 4.3.4 maybe included in 13.1 if it's stable enough. I doubt whether 4.4 will be included as it will mean a lot of changes, like qt 4.6.
Also, I believe 4.3.4 is the last maintenance release since 4.4 is supposed to be out by Feb2010.
 
Old 12-02-2009, 09:20 PM   #5
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 13,923
Blog Entries: 44

Rep: Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by cwizardone View Post
May I ask what you mean by "repackaging"?
Thanks.
The way that Slackware is contained. Right now we have order copies that are dual sided. We have download mirrors for a particular arch. Slackware doesn't have a LiveCD unless you consider the Install CD/DVD as one. Sure there's 'Slax' but with today's technology we have media choices that could be used for a Live distribution. So to be productive and available a repackage would be nice.

Please don't take my statement as being anti-Slackware. It's that loads of people in the GNU/Linux community look down at Slack as it's still not GUI based install. Sure, the curses works for me and I prefer it but word of mouth sells big. I don't want a hold your hand distro and believe every method should be looked at to achieve a true community distribution. Most people just want their computer too work.

Stability and reliability are what counts so Slackware meets these requirements hands down without debate.

Last edited by onebuck; 12-02-2009 at 10:04 PM.
 
Old 12-02-2009, 09:27 PM   #6
~sHyLoCk~
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2008
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 1,173
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 129Reputation: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by onebuck View Post
It's that loads of people in the GNU/Linux community look down at Slack as it's still not GUI based install.
Those people are better off not using slackware.
Slackware installer for me is perfect. Kind of like Arch, but more informative. You actually understand what's being installed and what the package does. Selection is simple as well. I wouldn't change a thing about slackware. That's just my opinion.

Last edited by ~sHyLoCk~; 12-02-2009 at 09:30 PM.
 
Old 12-02-2009, 09:35 PM   #7
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 13,923
Blog Entries: 44

Rep: Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158
Hi,

Yes, but we are familiar with Slackware installs and functionality. Slackware doesn't have to be a hold your hand distribution to have a GUI install. Plus having multiple choices for install media would be a big plus along with a boot selection for the method of install.

 
Old 12-02-2009, 09:59 PM   #8
hitest
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Void, Debian, Slackware
Posts: 7,342

Rep: Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746
Quote:
Originally Posted by onebuck View Post
I don't want a hold your hand distro and believe every method should be look at to achieve a true community distribution. Most people just want their computer too work.
Stability and reliability are what counts so Slackware meets these requirements hands down without debate.
Agreed. For me Slackware is designed perfectly; I like being able to configure my system with a text editor and the CLI. Slackware's KISS philosophy works.
Stability and security are Slackware trademarks.
 
Old 12-02-2009, 10:09 PM   #9
~sHyLoCk~
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2008
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 1,173
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 129Reputation: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by onebuck View Post
Hi,

Yes, but we are familiar with Slackware installs and functionality. Slackware doesn't have to be a hold your hand distribution to have a GUI install. Plus having multiple choices for install media would be a big plus along with a boot selection for the method of install.

Yep I think that would be a great idea, like Debian has both GUI and Text based install. Use whichever you like. However, doesn't that go against the KISS philosophy?
 
Old 12-02-2009, 10:33 PM   #10
SpelledJ
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: Birmingham, AL
Distribution: Slackware64-13.1, 12.1
Posts: 119

Rep: Reputation: 20
I had the same thought that 13.1 may have a release interval on the short side of average, but I wouldn't expect it before March. I've never seen a release faster than 6 months, but I doubt this will be another 13-month wait like 11.0 was.

The timing of 12.2, the announcement of 13 RC1, and the KDE releases of 4.2.4 and 4.3 RC1 just didn't seem to line up well. Waiting on 4.3.0 could've pushed the release of 13 too far, so I can understand going with 4.2.4.

Pat & crew did get 4.3.2 into -current about 6 weeks after 13, and only about 2 weeks after KDE released it. That should satisfy most folks who really want 4.3.
 
Old 12-02-2009, 10:58 PM   #11
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 13,923
Blog Entries: 44

Rep: Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by ~sHyLoCk~ View Post
Yep I think that would be a great idea, like Debian has both GUI and Text based install. Use whichever you like. However, doesn't that go against the KISS philosophy?
I think it's doable and still be a KISS. Text based is simple and reliable. But you need to remember that a lot is dependent on the user for this technique. Loads of people find it complex in a since for lack of transparency.

Now if you cookbook a recipe for a install you will still find people that don't follow directions be it because of communication barriers or just plain unable to step through properly. As some say; 'He couldn't pour piss out of a boot even if the instructions were on the bottom of the boot'.

 
Old 12-02-2009, 11:06 PM   #12
~sHyLoCk~
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2008
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 1,173
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 129Reputation: 129
lol.

Back on topic, KDE4.3.4 should be in 13.1 but 4.4 will require rebuilding apps with qt4.6, and since this is a version jump, a lot of new features will be introduced, testing could take a while.
 
Old 12-03-2009, 11:24 AM   #13
Erik_FL
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Boynton Beach, FL
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 821

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 258Reputation: 258Reputation: 258
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~sHyLoCk~ View Post
lol.

Back on topic, KDE4.3.4 should be in 13.1 but 4.4 will require rebuilding apps with qt4.6, and since this is a version jump, a lot of new features will be introduced, testing could take a while.
I would be happy with KDE 4.3.4 in the next Slackware release if that proves to be a good enough KDE version. I've always been in favor of Slackware using the most stable and supportable versions of software rather than the latest versions. That does assume there is a stable version of something, and KDE still seems unfinished. I'll remain patiently eager for Slackware 13.1.

"We don't need no stinkin' graphical installer!" I like the Slackware installation disc just fine. It boots fast, then takes care of the most tedious and complicated part of the process (the packages and some configuration). I had no trouble at all following the text setup menus. Slackware does not have to try to be the most popular distro, nor imitate the other distros. The goals of Slackware are different. There are plenty of choices for live Linux discs and autopilot distros. The takeoff might be a little more bumpy with Slackware but it's so much better when I get to fly the plane instead of just being a passenger.
 
Old 12-03-2009, 12:32 PM   #14
dolphin77
Member
 
Registered: May 2009
Location: Odesa, Ukraine
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 206

Rep: Reputation: 60
There is no big issue about kde 4.3.4.

I just took the tree from slackware64-current/source/kde
put new source files to slackware64-current/source/kde/src
changed version in KDE.options to 4.3.4

and everything built as it should. I am running 4.3.4 for more than 1 day. And I donot really see any difference. Purhaps some bugs were fixed, but I do not see any difference as everyday user.

And there is no need to push for new release just because new kde bugfix was released. I believe, to get new release there should some major changes. For example new x server, which should be out next spring, I believe.

Anyway it is just my 0.005 cent.
 
Old 12-03-2009, 12:40 PM   #15
Alexvader
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Japan
Distribution: Arch, Debian, Slackware
Posts: 994

Rep: Reputation: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik_FL View Post
.... The takeoff might be a little more bumpy with Slackware but it's so much better when I get to fly the plane instead of just being a passenger.
There are several things better than flying a plane, and one of them is actually designing the plane you are going to fly with...

...this is what you get to do with LFS, BLFS, Slackware, ARCH, or Crux.

Returning to the topic... I think that kde <current> is already stable and snappy enough to be used...

No need to wait for Slackware64 13.x to use KDE...

BRGDS


Alex
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KDE 3.5.10 on Slackware 12.2 - logging in with kde causes lock up WideEyedSleeper Slackware 7 08-09-2009 11:39 AM
How do I install KDE 4.2 to Slackware 12.2? Slack 12.2 comes with KDE 3.5 dustin2128 Slackware - Installation 3 07-24-2009 12:23 AM
Upgrade to KDE 4.2.0 in Slackware 12.1 (from KDE 3.5) Bonny Linux - Software 5 06-07-2009 08:11 AM
KDE 3.5.10 and KDE 4 together without conflicts in Slackware 12.2. Is it possible? Slacker Steve Slackware 4 01-12-2009 02:29 AM
dpi font | gdm | kde DE | xinitrc.kde | Slackware 10 acummings Slackware 2 07-28-2004 10:28 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration