LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2008, 03:39 PM   #46
BCarey
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: New Mexico
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,639

Rep: Reputation: Disabled

Quote:
Originally Posted by rworkman View Post
Indeed. In fact, I just finished (and am using it at the moment) a fully encrypted Slackware -current installation with LVM.
I'm using it, too. Very cool, encrypted hibernation and everything. And the first time I resized a partition it was incredible how fast it was compared to gparted (really there is no comparison).

Brian
 
Old 04-25-2008, 05:36 PM   #47
brooky9999
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: Marlow, UK
Distribution: Slackware 12.2
Posts: 232

Rep: Reputation: 30
I can't wait till 12.1 comes out. I'm literally checking the site every few hours... man I need to get out more.

I'm looking forward to the whole (well, nearly) disk encryption stuff. I followed the guide for 12.0 and tried doing it in a VM... my God it failed with bells on!

Either I cant read or it's a tad difficult. I think I was pushing my luck anyway as I wanted not only /home encrypted but the root partition too (basically, everything but /boot).

Ah well, here looking at you - 12.1 ;-)



M.
 
Old 04-29-2008, 06:17 PM   #48
dan_slack
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Bucharest - Romania
Distribution: Slackware 12
Posts: 57

Rep: Reputation: 15
12.1 RC3 is out

Well, time is high and Pat is getting closer to the new release... http://www.slackware.com/changelog/current.php?cpu=i386
Please all passengers be sited.
We'll have some more fun :-)
 
Old 04-29-2008, 06:54 PM   #49
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 13,925

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 44

Rep: Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159
Hi,
Quote:
Originally Posted by dan_slack View Post
Well, time is high and Pat is getting closer to the new release... http://www.slackware.com/changelog/current.php?cpu=i386
Please all passengers be sited.
We'll have some more fun :-)
I'm sure you meant 'seated' but the slip does apply somewhat.
 
Old 04-29-2008, 07:43 PM   #50
Slacker_Rex
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Arkansas
Distribution: Slackware 12.2
Posts: 104

Rep: Reputation: 15
Yes, Ironically was just on IM with a friend and told them it was RC2, checked the changelog after I hit send, and saw it was up to RC3 now. Just in time after the semester to be able to upgrade :-) Just as well it was not sooner for me.
 
Old 05-01-2008, 02:24 AM   #51
chaz_bro1972
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Distribution: Slackware64-Current, Multilib
Posts: 242

Rep: Reputation: 27
hey all,

Does anybody know anything about the new 12.1 rc3 version of Slackware? Like why is it 12.1 and not 13? Will Pat eventually use the KDE 4 (I'm not a fan of the new KDE, btw)?

I am a huge fan of Slackware. I replaced Knoppix with it on my PC, and replaced SimplyMEPIS & Ubuntu with Slackware on my daughter's PC. Slackware: It does what I want, not what it thinks I want.
 
Old 05-01-2008, 02:35 AM   #52
Smedley
Registered User
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 74

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaz_bro1972 View Post
hey all,

Does anybody know anything about the new 12.1 rc3 version of Slackware? Like why is it 12.1 and not 13? Will Pat eventually use the KDE 4 (I'm not a fan of the new KDE, btw)?

I am a huge fan of Slackware. I replaced Knoppix with it on my PC, and replaced SimplyMEPIS & Ubuntu with Slackware on my daughter's PC. Slackware: It does what I want, not what it thinks I want.
I am running 12.1 rc3 now....as of tonight, Pat has released rc4, apparently there was a potential show stopper in the kernels. See below:

Code:
Wed Apr 30 20:36:48 CDT 2008
12.1 RC4.  We think this should be the last one.
a/kernel-generic-2.6.24.5-i486-2.tgz:  Patched to fix a security issue in
  fs/dnotify.c.  The use of dnotify (largely replaced by inotify on 2.6.x
  systems) could lead to a local DoS, or possibly a local root hole.  We said
  we wouldn't make changes now unless something was "critical" -- and it seems
  we got what we wished for.  ;-)  This flaw will also be addressed in the
  kernels for previous releases as soon as possible.  The patch itself may be
  found in source/k/linux-2.6.24.5-CVE-2008-1375-patch/.
  For additional information (when the CVE candidate is opened), see:
    http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-1375
  All the kernel packages below should also be considered security fixes.
  (* Security fix *)
a/kernel-generic-smp-2.6.24.5_smp-i686-2.tgz:  Patched and recompiled.
a/kernel-huge-2.6.24.5-i486-2.tgz:  Patched and recompiled.
a/kernel-huge-smp-2.6.24.5_smp-i686-2.tgz:  Patched and recompiled.
a/kernel-modules-2.6.24.5-i486-2.tgz:  Patched and recompiled.
a/kernel-modules-smp-2.6.24.5_smp-i686-2.tgz:  Patched and recompiled.
d/kernel-headers-2.6.24.5_smp-x86-2.tgz:  Rebuilt from a patched source tree.
k/kernel-source-2.6.24.5_smp-noarch-2.tgz:  Patched (leaving dnotify.c.orig
  for comparison and/or reverting to patch up to a newer kernel later).
l/svgalib_helper-1.9.25_2.6.24.5-i486-2.tgz:  Recompiled.
extra/linux-2.6.24.5-nosmp-sdk/:  Updated SMP to no-SMP kernel source patch.
extra/slackpkg/slackpkg-2.70.3-noarch-1.tgz:  Upgraded to
  slackpkg-2.70.3-noarch-1 (release ready).  Thanks to Piter Punk!  -:)
kernels/huge.s/*:  Patched and recompiled.
kernels/hugesmp.s/*:  Patched and recompiled.
kernels/speakup.s/*:  Patched and recompiled.
isolinux/initrd.img:  Rebuilt with newly compiled kernel modules.
usb-and-pxe-installers/:  Rebuilt usbboot.img with newly compiled
  kernel modules.
rc3 is running beautifully and so far, the best Slackware release to date and I have been using it since release 8.

From what I understand, KDE4 will not be included in a Slackware release until it is much more mature, robby and alienbob can confirm whether I am correct on this.

Happy Slacking.................
 
Old 05-01-2008, 04:29 AM   #53
Zmyrgel
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Finland
Distribution: Slackware, CentOS, RHEL, OpenBSD
Posts: 1,006

Rep: Reputation: 37
These are quite happy times. OpenBSD 4.3 and new Slackware get released almost at the same time
 
Old 05-01-2008, 05:51 AM   #54
chess
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: 127.0.0.1
Distribution: Slackware and OpenBSD
Posts: 740

Rep: Reputation: 190Reputation: 190
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaz_bro1972 View Post
Does anybody know anything about the new 12.1 rc3 version of Slackware? Like why is it 12.1 and not 13?
Because Pat decided to name it 12.1? I would not worry about version numbering. It's actually quite arbitrary.

Quote:
Will Pat eventually use the KDE 4 (I'm not a fan of the new KDE, btw)?
Pat has already said in the changelog that KDE 4 will be in the next version of Slackware after 12.1.
 
Old 05-01-2008, 05:51 AM   #55
chess
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: 127.0.0.1
Distribution: Slackware and OpenBSD
Posts: 740

Rep: Reputation: 190Reputation: 190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zmyrgel View Post
These are quite happy times. OpenBSD 4.3 and new Slackware get released almost at the same time
Agreed. OpenBSD 4.3 is really nice (as is OpenBSD -current with WPA which my Thinkpad is happily using).
 
Old 05-01-2008, 06:54 AM   #56
Zmyrgel
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Finland
Distribution: Slackware, CentOS, RHEL, OpenBSD
Posts: 1,006

Rep: Reputation: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by chess View Post
Agreed. OpenBSD 4.3 is really nice (as is OpenBSD -current with WPA which my Thinkpad is happily using).
Glad to know that others are in the right path

T60 running OpenBSD-current here. I only wished that WPA-support would have been there sooner when I really needed it. At least it worked just fine in Slackware so it wasn't biggie.
 
Old 05-01-2008, 07:07 AM   #57
jong357
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914

Rep: Reputation: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaz_bro1972 View Post
hey all,

Does anybody know anything about the new 12.1 rc3 version of Slackware? Like why is it 12.1 and not 13?
So it takes twice as long to reach Slackware 98.1... Oddly enough Pat did a 3 or 4 number Major version bump just to catch up with the Big Three.... Ah.... Marketing. Gotta love it.

If he's superstitious, It might just jump to Slackware 14... Version numbers mean nothing when it comes to an OS (usually).

As an after thought, if anyone is running Vista, is it called NT 5.3?

Last edited by jong357; 05-01-2008 at 07:17 AM.
 
Old 05-01-2008, 07:40 AM   #58
Jeebizz
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware15.0 64-Bit Desktop, Debian 11 non-free Toshiba Satellite Notebook
Posts: 4,186

Rep: Reputation: 1378Reputation: 1378Reputation: 1378Reputation: 1378Reputation: 1378Reputation: 1378Reputation: 1378Reputation: 1378Reputation: 1378Reputation: 1378
Quote:
Originally Posted by jong357
As an after thought, if anyone is running Vista, is it called NT 5.3?
If only. It is actually marked as NT6.0. I miss NT4.0 and NT5.0.
 
Old 05-01-2008, 08:06 AM   #59
jong357
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914

Rep: Reputation: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeebizz View Post
If only. It is actually marked as NT6.0. I miss NT4.0 and NT5.0.
So do I.. 2000 was great. I still use it on one box. Xp is staying on my main box until Windows learns how to make a decent OS. Gave Vista a fair chance for a week and then rolled back to XP. Horrid.

The Vista version kinda makes sense tho. Windows is pretty good about using version numbers properly. Major version bumps should be reserved for significant platform changes. Seeing as how Vista is completely revamped (sucks) compared to XP, it would make sense that it's 6.0....

That or significant kernel changes should reflect a new major version bump, as was the case with NT 4.0... Kinda hard to do with Linux but hey... I kinda wish Distros would follow those guidelines. Or you could do a 180 and version like Arch Linux does... Do rolling point releases until you hit the next whole number...

Last edited by jong357; 05-01-2008 at 08:16 AM.
 
Old 05-01-2008, 08:28 AM   #60
mcnalu
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: Glasgow, UK
Distribution: Slackware current
Posts: 423

Rep: Reputation: 73
I've got win 2000 running inside Virtual Box on my Slackware 11 laptop so that I can test software apps I'm developing. Very stable and swift.

When it comes out, I might try running Slackware 12.1 inside Slackware 11, just for a laugh...
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: 2.4.36 Stable Release LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-03-2008 10:50 AM
most stable gcc release corbis_demon Linux - Newbie 1 02-19-2006 03:56 AM
Stable BSD Release? spaaarky21 *BSD 7 07-27-2004 09:01 AM
Next stable release? unholy Debian 4 05-18-2004 03:37 PM
Next Stable Release Date? thcmwz Debian 2 12-05-2003 07:34 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration