Slackware 12.1 rc2, It's getting close to stable release.
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Indeed. In fact, I just finished (and am using it at the moment) a fully encrypted Slackware -current installation with LVM.
I'm using it, too. Very cool, encrypted hibernation and everything. And the first time I resized a partition it was incredible how fast it was compared to gparted (really there is no comparison).
I can't wait till 12.1 comes out. I'm literally checking the site every few hours... man I need to get out more.
I'm looking forward to the whole (well, nearly) disk encryption stuff. I followed the guide for 12.0 and tried doing it in a VM... my God it failed with bells on!
Either I cant read or it's a tad difficult. I think I was pushing my luck anyway as I wanted not only /home encrypted but the root partition too (basically, everything but /boot).
Yes, Ironically was just on IM with a friend and told them it was RC2, checked the changelog after I hit send, and saw it was up to RC3 now. Just in time after the semester to be able to upgrade :-) Just as well it was not sooner for me.
Does anybody know anything about the new 12.1 rc3 version of Slackware? Like why is it 12.1 and not 13? Will Pat eventually use the KDE 4 (I'm not a fan of the new KDE, btw)?
I am a huge fan of Slackware. I replaced Knoppix with it on my PC, and replaced SimplyMEPIS & Ubuntu with Slackware on my daughter's PC. Slackware: It does what I want, not what it thinks I want.
Does anybody know anything about the new 12.1 rc3 version of Slackware? Like why is it 12.1 and not 13? Will Pat eventually use the KDE 4 (I'm not a fan of the new KDE, btw)?
I am a huge fan of Slackware. I replaced Knoppix with it on my PC, and replaced SimplyMEPIS & Ubuntu with Slackware on my daughter's PC. Slackware: It does what I want, not what it thinks I want.
I am running 12.1 rc3 now....as of tonight, Pat has released rc4, apparently there was a potential show stopper in the kernels. See below:
Code:
Wed Apr 30 20:36:48 CDT 2008
12.1 RC4. We think this should be the last one.
a/kernel-generic-2.6.24.5-i486-2.tgz: Patched to fix a security issue in
fs/dnotify.c. The use of dnotify (largely replaced by inotify on 2.6.x
systems) could lead to a local DoS, or possibly a local root hole. We said
we wouldn't make changes now unless something was "critical" -- and it seems
we got what we wished for. ;-) This flaw will also be addressed in the
kernels for previous releases as soon as possible. The patch itself may be
found in source/k/linux-2.6.24.5-CVE-2008-1375-patch/.
For additional information (when the CVE candidate is opened), see:
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-1375
All the kernel packages below should also be considered security fixes.
(* Security fix *)
a/kernel-generic-smp-2.6.24.5_smp-i686-2.tgz: Patched and recompiled.
a/kernel-huge-2.6.24.5-i486-2.tgz: Patched and recompiled.
a/kernel-huge-smp-2.6.24.5_smp-i686-2.tgz: Patched and recompiled.
a/kernel-modules-2.6.24.5-i486-2.tgz: Patched and recompiled.
a/kernel-modules-smp-2.6.24.5_smp-i686-2.tgz: Patched and recompiled.
d/kernel-headers-2.6.24.5_smp-x86-2.tgz: Rebuilt from a patched source tree.
k/kernel-source-2.6.24.5_smp-noarch-2.tgz: Patched (leaving dnotify.c.orig
for comparison and/or reverting to patch up to a newer kernel later).
l/svgalib_helper-1.9.25_2.6.24.5-i486-2.tgz: Recompiled.
extra/linux-2.6.24.5-nosmp-sdk/: Updated SMP to no-SMP kernel source patch.
extra/slackpkg/slackpkg-2.70.3-noarch-1.tgz: Upgraded to
slackpkg-2.70.3-noarch-1 (release ready). Thanks to Piter Punk! -:)
kernels/huge.s/*: Patched and recompiled.
kernels/hugesmp.s/*: Patched and recompiled.
kernels/speakup.s/*: Patched and recompiled.
isolinux/initrd.img: Rebuilt with newly compiled kernel modules.
usb-and-pxe-installers/: Rebuilt usbboot.img with newly compiled
kernel modules.
rc3 is running beautifully and so far, the best Slackware release to date and I have been using it since release 8.
From what I understand, KDE4 will not be included in a Slackware release until it is much more mature, robby and alienbob can confirm whether I am correct on this.
Agreed. OpenBSD 4.3 is really nice (as is OpenBSD -current with WPA which my Thinkpad is happily using).
Glad to know that others are in the right path
T60 running OpenBSD-current here. I only wished that WPA-support would have been there sooner when I really needed it. At least it worked just fine in Slackware so it wasn't biggie.
Does anybody know anything about the new 12.1 rc3 version of Slackware? Like why is it 12.1 and not 13?
So it takes twice as long to reach Slackware 98.1... Oddly enough Pat did a 3 or 4 number Major version bump just to catch up with the Big Three.... Ah.... Marketing. Gotta love it.
If he's superstitious, It might just jump to Slackware 14... Version numbers mean nothing when it comes to an OS (usually).
As an after thought, if anyone is running Vista, is it called NT 5.3?
If only. It is actually marked as NT6.0. I miss NT4.0 and NT5.0.
So do I.. 2000 was great. I still use it on one box. Xp is staying on my main box until Windows learns how to make a decent OS. Gave Vista a fair chance for a week and then rolled back to XP. Horrid.
The Vista version kinda makes sense tho. Windows is pretty good about using version numbers properly. Major version bumps should be reserved for significant platform changes. Seeing as how Vista is completely revamped (sucks) compared to XP, it would make sense that it's 6.0....
That or significant kernel changes should reflect a new major version bump, as was the case with NT 4.0... Kinda hard to do with Linux but hey... I kinda wish Distros would follow those guidelines. Or you could do a 180 and version like Arch Linux does... Do rolling point releases until you hit the next whole number...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.