Thanks for the answer.
Yes, I'm very sure I installed sata.i. The slackware setup seems to choose whichever kernel you picked when you booted from CD. And I've tried to install it several times, only to have the same result thrown at me every time.
I actually tried to install Ubuntu today (hoping it would setup lilo for me correctly so I could rip its configuration), but it seems that Ubuntu use GRUB, not to mention that after installing, it rebooted and just stopped while displaying "GRUB" on screen.
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. Ubuntu didn't even let me configure anything (thats actually why I tried to use it, hoping it would "do the right thing", so I couldn't have messed up any settings related to the installation either.
Here's how my fdisk -l shows my setup:
Code:
Disk /dev/sda: 164.6 GB, 164696555520 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 20023 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 1206 9767488+ 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 1217 20023 151067227+ 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 1217 1341 1004031 82 Linux swap
/dev/sda6 1342 6204 39062016 83 Linux
/dev/sda7 6205 7420 9767488+ 83 Linux
/dev/sda8 7421 20023 101233566 83 Linux
Disk /dev/sdb: 164.6 GB, 164696555520 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 20023 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
Hmm, does this mean that my mirroring isen't set up correctly?
Shouldn't partitioning sda also partition sdb in the same way?
I tried to partition sdb the same way as sda, didn't make any difference.
The lilo.conf that liloconfig produce is:
Code:
boot = /dev/sda
prompt
timeout = 50
vga = normal
image = /boot/vmlinuz
root = /dev/sda1
label = slackware
read-only
Am I supposed to use sata.i? or raid.i?