Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
08-28-2009, 07:48 PM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware 13.0 32-bit
Posts: 1,973
Rep: 
|
Slackware 01 00 00 00
Did I miss something? I just finished installing Slackware64 13.0 on my notebook, and chose the LILO setup with the Slackware background, rather than the traditional LILO setup. Normally like before the image should say Slackware Linux, instead it is Slackware 01 00 00 00.
Does anyone else see this with their setup? This is a normal bitmap, but did something go wrong with the logo or something?
Last edited by Jeebizz; 03-22-2011 at 03:03 PM.
|
|
|
|
08-28-2009, 07:51 PM
|
#2
|
|
Slackware Contributor
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: New Zealand
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 980
|
convert it to binary =)
Haha yeah too many late nights.
Edit: What hemp said "Convert it to decimal"
Last edited by mRgOBLIN; 08-28-2009 at 07:56 PM.
|
|
|
|
08-28-2009, 07:53 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Topeka, KS
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 181
Rep:
|
Or convert it from binary to decimal.
|
|
|
|
08-28-2009, 07:57 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware 13.0 32-bit
Posts: 1,973
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Oh. Well look, the only reason why I didn't catch that before was because the drive on my HP Notebook is furked up. I sent it to HP to get my wireless fixed, and they furked it up apparently by not putting it back right. Now whenver I move the notebook a little, the optical drive pops open, and sometimes even burning fails. I burned a successful Slack DVD, and even before burning I did a MD5 checksum. No errors while installing either.
I converted it and it comes out as: "0011000000110001001000000011000000110000001000000011000000110000001000000011000000110000."
I even decoded the original and it came out as @. I thought it would come out as Linux or something, but it didn't.
|
|
|
|
08-28-2009, 08:10 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware 13.0 32-bit
Posts: 1,973
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Oh decimal, not binary  64.
Last edited by Jeebizz; 08-28-2009 at 08:12 PM.
|
|
|
|
08-29-2009, 01:24 AM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2005
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,439
Rep:
|
 I like it
|
|
|
|
08-29-2009, 04:40 AM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 2,841
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowsnipes
 I like it
|
Me too. It's a nice touch.
Octal works well too. "Slackware 100!"
Then again, It sounds too much like a 1980s Pop-group.
How about Hex, "Slackware 40"
Damn! Another 80's Pop-group!
On reflection, I think it's best to stick with the binary. 
Last edited by GazL; 08-29-2009 at 04:41 AM.
|
|
|
|
08-29-2009, 05:48 AM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Portugal
Distribution: Slackware64 13.0, Slackware64 13.1
Posts: 536
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GazL
How about Hex, "Slackware 40"
Damn! Another 80's Pop-group!
|
You mean "Slackware D"....no?
|
|
|
|
08-29-2009, 07:05 AM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 2,841
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by easuter
You mean "Slackware D"....no?
|
Not in relation to this thread. It was about Slackware64 as in the logo.
binary "01 00 00 00"
octal 100
hex 40.
Slackware 13 would have been:
binary 00 00 11 01
octal 15
hex 0D
...although "Slackware D" does sound like it ought to have Jack Black in it.
edit:
I suppose we ought to mention BCD as well,
00 01 00 11 - Slackware 13
01 10 01 00 - Slackware 64
My god, that takes me back... Not seen binary coded decimal in years!
Last edited by GazL; 08-29-2009 at 07:10 AM.
|
|
|
|
08-29-2009, 07:51 AM
|
#10
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Portugal
Distribution: Slackware64 13.0, Slackware64 13.1
Posts: 536
Rep:
|
Slackware40 D

|
|
|
|
08-29-2009, 01:39 PM
|
#11
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 799
Rep: 
|
I got a nice giggle out of it when I installed 64-current near it's release.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:45 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|