LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-14-2013, 04:07 PM   #226
gegechris99
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware 15.0 64bit
Posts: 1,159
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 392Reputation: 392Reputation: 392Reputation: 392
user feedback


@phenixia2003: Thanks for answering my questions.

Regarding improvement of "install-new" function to support 3rd-party repositories, I would definitely prefer option (2): i.e. make it optional so user has to manually select in config file which repository(ies) to be added to appear in "install-new".

Quote:
In case of (2). Do you want the list of changes found in repositories to be :

a) never printed
c) part of the output of "slackpkg update"
d) part of the output of "slackpkg check-update"
To stay consistent with what slackpkg does with the official Slackware repository, I would vote for option a). List of new packages in a 3rd-party repository would only be listed with command "slackpkg install-new" ,of course the repository must first have been "selected" for "install-new". I'm not aware of another way to list the new Slackware packages using slackpkg.
 
Old 11-15-2013, 04:44 AM   #227
zerouno
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 983

Rep: Reputation: 352Reputation: 352Reputation: 352Reputation: 352
Notice that the official install-new shown all new packages from the previous stable release to the latest new package, and not from the latest slackpkg update command or the latest install-new command unless you install or blacklist the new packages.

If you do that for a thirdy party repository started empty, slackpkg install-new will show the same output of slackpkg install repository that is not useful becouse I dont think that a user want install an entire repository that contains heterogeneous or conflicting packages. A similar install-new may be useful for repositories that suppose you want fully install as multilib, ktown, gsb... that contains multiple package for a single purpose; if you run slackpkg upgrade ktown may be needed to run slackpkg install ktown. If you run slackpkg upgrade alienbob I don't think that you need to run slackpkg install alienbob.
 
Old 11-15-2013, 07:36 AM   #228
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Quote:
Originally Posted by zerouno View Post
slackpkg install-new will show the same output of slackpkg install repository that is not useful
Again, be very careful not to mess with the default behaviour of slackpkg.

Eric
 
Old 11-15-2013, 10:21 AM   #229
phenixia2003
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,052

Rep: Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008
Hello,

Quote:
Originally Posted by zerouno View Post
Notice that the official install-new shown all new packages from the previous stable release to the latest new package, and not from the latest slackpkg update command or the latest install-new command unless you install or blacklist the new packages.
Just an idea: For a given repository, all the changes collected when running "slackpkg update" could be merged, version by version :

Code:
Repository R-14.1

changeset1(add:a,b,c) => 
  R-14.1.latest-added-packages=(a,b,c)
  R-14.1.added-packages=(a,b,c)

changeset2(add:d,e,f) => 
  R-14.1.latest-added-packages=(d,e,f)
  R-14.1.added-packages=(a,b,c,d,e,f)
...
Quote:
Originally Posted by zerouno View Post
If you do that for a thirdy party repository started empty, slackpkg install-new will show the same output of slackpkg install repository
What do you mean by "third party repository started empty ?" A repository with 0 packages, then you add 10, etc

For a given repository R, "slackpkg install R" will only show the uninstalled packages, and, slackpkg install-new, will only show the packages identified as new.

For a repository R, when you run "slackpkg update", a snapshot of available packages is taken, then the data are fetched from the repository, and a new snapshot is taken. When these snapshots are different, the changes are collected :
Code:
R=(no packages) => slackpkg update => no new packages found in R => install-new will show nothing from R
R=(a,b,c)       => slackpkg update => new(a,b,c) found in R      => install-new will show (a,b,c) from R
R=(a,b,c,d)     => slackpkg update => new(d) found in R          => install-new will show (d) from R
R=(a,b,c,d)     => slackpkg update => no change found            => install-new will show (d) from R
...



Important:
Keep in mind that implementation of "install-new" I sent last day is incomplete and must be (really) considered as a work in progress. It needs more attention, because it does not take care of defined priorities, nor the packages that could have been installed manually or by any other ways.

Cheers.

--
SeB
 
Old 11-15-2013, 10:44 AM   #230
zerouno
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 983

Rep: Reputation: 352Reputation: 352Reputation: 352Reputation: 352
For info, I will continue developing next monday. This weekend I've not my pc, and I may not read the forum.
 
Old 11-19-2013, 07:32 AM   #231
zerouno
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 983

Rep: Reputation: 352Reputation: 352Reputation: 352Reputation: 352
regarding the install-new functionality for now I would wait.

In the development tree I added other features.

All feature from the stable and now:

- Added ALLOW32BIT flag to allow to install 32bit packages on a 64bit system
- Added an install log in /var/lib/slackpkg/install.log; launching "/usr/libexec/slackpkg/makeinstlog.sh -t" TRY to detect the repository from which the packages was installed
- Added WGETOPTS
- Added the greylist

Are all embrional code
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-19-2013, 07:55 AM   #232
zerouno
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 983

Rep: Reputation: 352Reputation: 352Reputation: 352Reputation: 352
well... the install.log function is bugged when you install multiple packages!
Code:
2013/11/19 11:29:00 upgraded:    seamonkey-solibs-2.22-x86_64-1.txz  [slackware64]  (was mozilla-firefox-24.1.0esr-x86_64-1)
2013/11/19 11:29:02 upgraded:    openssh-6.4p1-x86_64-1.txz  [slackware64]  (was mozilla-firefox-24.1.0esr-x86_64-1)
2013/11/19 11:29:08 upgraded:    php-5.4.22-x86_64-1.txz  [slackware64]  (was mozilla-firefox-24.1.0esr-x86_64-1)
2013/11/19 11:29:16 upgraded:    samba-4.1.1-x86_64-1.txz  [slackware64]  (was mozilla-firefox-24.1.0esr-x86_64-1)
2013/11/19 11:29:29 upgraded:    mozilla-firefox-25.0.1-x86_64-1.txz  [slackware64]  (was mozilla-firefox-24.1.0esr-x86_64-1)
due a VERY BAD cut/paste

Last edited by zerouno; 11-19-2013 at 07:57 AM.
 
Old 11-19-2013, 08:00 AM   #233
phenixia2003
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,052

Rep: Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008
Hello,

Quote:
Originally Posted by zerouno View Post
regarding the install-new functionality for now I would wait.
I totally agree.


--
SeB
 
Old 11-19-2013, 08:24 AM   #234
phenixia2003
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,052

Rep: Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008
Hello,

Quote:
Originally Posted by zerouno View Post
- Added ALLOW32BIT flag to allow to install 32bit packages on a 64bit system
About this, It would be great to automatically put 32-bit packages on greylist (I didn't check if this can be done at runtime) when user runs "slackpkg upgrade" / "slackpkg upgrade-all". With that, the user would have to explicitly select the 32-bit packages he wants to upgrade, and this will prevent him to mistakenly upgrade some of installed packages with 32-bit version.


--
SeB
 
Old 11-19-2013, 08:47 AM   #235
zerouno
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 983

Rep: Reputation: 352Reputation: 352Reputation: 352Reputation: 352
Yes it's possible.
slackpkg+-20131119.3-noarch-1mt.txz do that.
Code:
                                                  │ │[ ] libmspack-0.3alpha-i486-1sl.txz                 slacky      │ │  
                                                  │ │[ ] libnice-0.1.3-i486-1sl.txz                      slacky      │ │  
                                                  │ │[*] libreoffice-4.1.3-x86_64-1dj.txz                salixos     │ │  
                                                  │ │[*] libreoffice-l10n-it-4.1.3-x86_64-1rl.txz        salixos     │ │  
                                                  │ │[ ] libsigc++-2.2.11-i486-1sl.txz                   slacky      │ │  
                                                  │ │[ ] libva-1.1.0-i486-1sl.txz                        slacky      │ │
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-19-2013, 08:55 AM   #236
phenixia2003
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,052

Rep: Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008
Hello,

Quote:
Originally Posted by zerouno View Post
Yes it's possible.
slackpkg+-20131119.3-noarch-1mt.txz do that.
Code:
                                                  │ │[ ] libmspack-0.3alpha-i486-1sl.txz                 slacky      │ │  
                                                  │ │[ ] libnice-0.1.3-i486-1sl.txz                      slacky      │ │  
                                                  │ │[*] libreoffice-4.1.3-x86_64-1dj.txz                salixos     │ │  
                                                  │ │[*] libreoffice-l10n-it-4.1.3-x86_64-1rl.txz        salixos     │ │  
                                                  │ │[ ] libsigc++-2.2.11-i486-1sl.txz                   slacky      │ │  
                                                  │ │[ ] libva-1.1.0-i486-1sl.txz                        slacky      │ │
Good job

Cheers.

--
SeB
 
Old 04-04-2014, 10:02 AM   #237
phenixia2003
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,052

Rep: Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008Reputation: 1008
Hello,

I wrote a small patch for slackpkg+ (slackpkgplus-1.3.0-2mt_20140404_2SeB.patch.txt) which solves this small bug, and adds a small improvement so that the command slackpkg check-updates reports the repositories which have been changed since the last update.

Here is an example of the new output of check-updates :
Code:
$ /usr/sbin/slackpkg check-updates

News on ChangeLog.txt

  [ Repository               ] [ Status               ]
    slackware                    AVAILABLE UPDATES    
    slackpkgplus                    Up to date        
    restricted                      Up to date        
    alienbob                     AVAILABLE UPDATES                 
    multilib                        Up to date
The name of each updated repository is saved in ~/.slackpkg/updated-repos.txt. When there's no update, this file is empty.

With that, you can create a crontab entry to be notified through a tooltip inside your preferred DE when updates are available. For instance, to check updates every 2 hours at the top of the hour :

Code:
0 */2 * * * export DISPLAY=:0 && /usr/sbin/slackpkg &>/dev/null check-updates && [ -s ~/.slackpkg/updated-repos.txt ] && notify-send -i dialog-warning "[ S L A C K P K G + ]" "Available updates in repositories: $(cat ~/.slackpkg/updated-repos.txt|tr '\n' ','|sed 's/,$//' )"
Note: the crontab entry above is for non-root users only: notify-send does not work when run as root. To workaround this, users who really want to run notify-send as root, can use this wrapper.

Examples:

1. Kde
Click image for larger version

Name:	slackpkg+updates-notify-kde.jpg
Views:	142
Size:	111.6 KB
ID:	15161

2. Xfce
Click image for larger version

Name:	slackpkg+updates-notify-xfce.jpg
Views:	110
Size:	125.1 KB
ID:	15162
Greetings.

--
SeB

Last edited by phenixia2003; 04-11-2014 at 02:48 AM.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-07-2014, 02:50 AM   #238
zerouno
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 983

Rep: Reputation: 352Reputation: 352Reputation: 352Reputation: 352
Good feature.

Currently I don't have my GPG-KEY , so I can't update the repository metadata (so it is not available with slackpkg upgrade slackpkg+), but I uploaded the new package on sourceforge.
 
Old 04-10-2014, 03:37 PM   #239
gegechris99
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware 15.0 64bit
Posts: 1,159
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 392Reputation: 392Reputation: 392Reputation: 392
Thank you phenixia2003 for this latest patch.

The DE notification is working fine except for the time details in the crontab entry.

Code:
* */1 * * *
runs the code every minute (i.e notification every minute).

I'm no crontab specialist, but to make it run once an hour, I would rather use something like that:

Every hour at 0 minute (ex: 21h00, 22h00....)
Code:
0 * * * *
Every 59 minutes (I don't know if 60 works here)
Code:
*/59 * * * *
For now, I've settled for every 55mn:
Code:
*/55 * * * *
I'm currently testing, so I will wait 55mn to confirm that this entry works. But at least, for now, I don't have the notification every minute
 
Old 04-11-2014, 01:32 AM   #240
samac
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Kirkwall, Orkney
Distribution: Linux Mint 20.3 - Cinnamon
Posts: 1,425

Rep: Reputation: 139Reputation: 139
Now that you have a notification you just need to add a quick start button that runs "slackpkg" update and upgrade, both graphically and automatically. Then you will have removed one of the "major fictions" of Slackware. That being, that it doesn't have a package manager.

samac

Last edited by samac; 04-11-2014 at 01:33 AM.
 
  


Reply

Tags
slackpkg


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Holding a package update from slackpkg gazj Slackware 2 01-25-2011 04:58 PM
Where can I find a 3rd Party Repository for RHEL 5? tightlikethat Linux - Newbie 3 02-27-2010 08:46 PM
Best 3rd Party RPM Repository for FC9 kromberg Fedora 11 11-13-2008 08:04 PM
Package Kit Error-- "Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository" mbvpixies78 Linux - Newbie 11 08-22-2008 07:20 PM
3rd party package managers? crontab Slackware 3 10-06-2007 10:34 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration