LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 11-10-2004, 08:16 AM   #1
mdarby
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Distribution: Slackware-Current / Debian
Posts: 795

Rep: Reputation: 30
Slackpkg vs. Swaret.


I normally use swaret, and all works rather well. I've heard good things about slackpkg, so I installed.

After updating slackpkg, I do a search for apache (just to test). It correctly lists the apache 1.3.x package, but it also lists all this extra crap?

Swaret:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
root@slackbox:~$ swaret --search apache
swaret 1.6.2-1

Listing available Packages matching Keyword: apache...
apache-1.3.33-i486-1 (1685 kB) [Status: NOT INSTALLED]

Slackpkg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
root@slackbox:~# slackpkg search apache

The list below shows all packages with the selected pattern.

[ installed ] - vim-6.3.007-i486-1
[ installed ] - zsh-4.2.1-i486-1
[ installed ] - gnome-icon-theme-1.2.3-noarch-1
[ installed ] - gnome-themes-extras-0.7-i486-1
[ installed ] - kdewebdev-3.3.1-i486-1
[uninstalled] - apache-1.3.33-i486-1
[ upgrade ] - mod_ssl-2.8.19_1.3.31-i486-1 --> mod_ssl-2.8.22_1.3.33-i486-1
[uninstalled] - php-4.3.9-i486-1
[uninstalled] - xvim-6.3.007-i486-1
[uninstalled] - emacspeak-20.0-i486-1


These extra packages obviously aren't dependencies, so what's the deal?
 
Old 11-18-2004, 09:58 PM   #2
win32sux
Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371
i think they are packages that have the word "apache" in their description...

=)
 
Old 11-18-2004, 10:04 PM   #3
mdarby
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Distribution: Slackware-Current / Debian
Posts: 795

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
But why would that be the default behavior? It seems rather odd to me.
 
Old 11-18-2004, 10:10 PM   #4
win32sux
Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371
yeah... maybe there's an option to make it "silent" or something...

i'm not sure, i don't use neither slackpkg nor swaret...
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
swaret and slackpkg lodder Slackware 5 10-14-2005 04:37 AM
Why does patrick seem to favor slackpkg over swaret? busbarn Slackware 12 11-10-2004 08:21 PM
Why does patrick seem to favor slackpkg over swaret? Barx Slackware 4 11-10-2004 09:59 AM
swaret or slackpkg ? frochet Slackware 8 06-11-2004 01:08 PM
slapt-get, swaret, or SlackPkg ??? GloVe Slackware 2 10-05-2003 12:11 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration