LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-21-2009, 06:48 AM   #1
GrapefruiTgirl
Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Rep: Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550
Question Slack64-current: X questions, Ext4 question


This Thread is where I *was* going to post but I decided my post was getting too broad and didn't want to throw that thread out of whack..

While I haven't had *exactly* the same problems as the above posters, I do have an 'issue' or two with X that may warrant a report: There's no transparency available on the desktop, (and RANDR does not work.). Compositing *seems* to work, but I really don't know if it is (how would I know without using eye-candy?)

I am using multiple monitors with Xinerama, so take that into account when considering this, as it is 99% likely that the Xinerama is inhibiting the RANDR though I am not certain, but as for transparency (and composite?), I have always had transparency on the desktop; I use it for Xterm windows.

Till 64-current came out, I've always used Slackware 11 (still am actually much of the time) with the nVidia driver (binary) and KDE and/or XFCE desktop.

Current setup: 64-current, nvidia-185.18.14_x86-64, MSI nVidia motherboard, dual PCI-E cards, dual LCD monitors.

Also note-- I haven't been using Slackpkg to keep this current; instead I am just rsync'ing the latest changes every day or two and manually updating. I haven't noted any problems with leftover files or similar issues with upgrading packages, but then I haven't been closely watching for that either.

So

1 -- should I have/need/want composite if I don't use any Compiz stuff? How to tell if it's working?
2 -- I'd like RANDR to work if possible; can it be done with Xinerama?
(The xorg log tells me that both the RANDR and Composite extensions are loaded)
3 - it
P.S. - I am still using an xorg.conf file with the server-layout, device, screen sections in it for the multiple monitors to work; without xorg.conf, my mouse/keyboard worked, but the 2 monitors did not. I added a couple lines to xorg.conf to prevent HAL from grabbing my input devices.
3) Ext4 Filesystem: are you using it? Are you finding it slow as hell? Or is it just me/something else making it look slow? Moving files/large blocks of data, and deleting files, seems really slow. I have been toying with the idea of a reinstall onto Ext2 for a comparison. What do you think?

Thanks
Keep up the good work!

Sasha

PS - also note, I have not yet rsynced today, so if something has changed that nay affect my post, please let me know. I'll re-sync today.

Last edited by GrapefruiTgirl; 07-21-2009 at 06:52 AM.
 
Old 07-21-2009, 07:35 AM   #2
Bruce Hill
HCL Maintainer
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Tupelo, MS
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 6,926

Rep: Reputation: 124Reputation: 124
One question ... did you reinstall the Nvidia driver after upgrading X.Org?

If not, amongst other things, you lose acceleration.
 
Old 07-21-2009, 07:44 AM   #3
kodon
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: [jax][fl][usa]
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 796

Rep: Reputation: 31
xdpyinfo will let you know if the extensions are loaded
 
Old 07-21-2009, 08:22 AM   #4
Didier Spaier
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slackware{,64}-{14.1,current} on a Lenovo Thinkpad T61 6457-4XG
Posts: 4,300

Rep: Reputation: 1063Reputation: 1063Reputation: 1063Reputation: 1063Reputation: 1063Reputation: 1063Reputation: 1063Reputation: 1063
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrapefruiTgirl View Post
3) Ext4 Filesystem: are you using it? Are you finding it slow as hell? Or is it just me/something else making it look slow? Moving files/large blocks of data, and deleting files, seems really slow. I have been toying with the idea of a reinstall onto Ext2 for a comparison. What do you think?
Hi Sasha,

I bought a new laptop a few days ago (Lenovo ThinkPad T61 with a 5400 RPM SATA HDD) and installed slackware64-current onto an ext4 file system. I can't see real difference for now with my old laptop (7200 RPM HDD with Reiserfs file system).

Anyhow to make a comparison I would format a small partition using ext2 (for instance) instead of reinstalling.

Did you try to tune your HDD with hdparm ?
 
Old 07-21-2009, 08:25 AM   #5
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 7,038
Blog Entries: 52

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I haven't noticed any speed difference between ext3 and ext4.
 
Old 07-21-2009, 08:41 AM   #6
GrapefruiTgirl
Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550
Hi, thanks to all who have replied so quick!

Bruce - yes, I reinstall the nvidia driver whenever there's any question, i.e. any upgrade, downgrade, kernel change etc.

Kodon - thank you, I didn't know of that command. I will check and post the output soon.

Didier, Merci -- thanks for your comparison/estimate of your situation. I have HDPARM running for error checking etc., but have not for quite a while actually set anything on any of my drives. I determined a while back that anything I was setting was getting set already automatically by the drive/BIOS/kernel already.
As for formatting a small part of the drive, I find it hard to believe but I am running out of 'spare' room on the drive :P so I was figuring since it's more a 'testing' install anyhow, I may just wipe it and reinstall; this way I don't need another partition (there are already like 12 partitions on this drive).

Brian - thanks to you too for your comparison there.

I just rsynced the latest changes so I will go check/reinstall the nvidia driver and check the output from 'xdpyinfo'

Sasha
 
Old 07-21-2009, 09:01 AM   #7
Ilgar
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Distribution: Slackware 14.1, Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 926

Rep: Reputation: 96
I too am using ext4, and it's working fine. It feels a bit faster but this may be due to the fact that I was using a totally encrypted disk layout before, whereas now I'm encrypting only the /home, swap and /tmp partitions.
 
Old 07-21-2009, 09:02 AM   #8
GrapefruiTgirl
Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550
OK, below is the output from my current running setup. I added the following to xorg.conf:

(tried) In the server flags section:

Option "xrandr" "true"

and (tried) at the end of the file:

Section "Extensions"
Option "Composite" "Enable"
Option "Xrandr" "Enable"
EndSection


But nothing changed. Xdpyinfo shows the exact same thing.

I have another issue too but will start another thread on it.

Sasha



Code:
bash-3.1$ xdpyinfo
name of display:    :0.0
version number:    11.0 
vendor string:    The X.Org Foundation
vendor release number:    10602000    
X.Org version: 1.6.2                  
maximum request size:  16777212 bytes 
motion buffer size:  256              
bitmap unit, bit order, padding:    32, LSBFirst, 32
image byte order:    LSBFirst                       
number of supported pixmap formats:    7            
supported pixmap formats:                           
    depth 1, bits_per_pixel 1, scanline_pad 32      
    depth 4, bits_per_pixel 8, scanline_pad 32      
    depth 8, bits_per_pixel 8, scanline_pad 32      
    depth 15, bits_per_pixel 16, scanline_pad 32    
    depth 16, bits_per_pixel 16, scanline_pad 32    
    depth 24, bits_per_pixel 32, scanline_pad 32    
    depth 32, bits_per_pixel 32, scanline_pad 32    
keycode range:    minimum 8, maximum 255            
focus:  window 0x1e004ba, revert to PointerRoot     
number of extensions:    23                         
    BIG-REQUESTS                                    
    DAMAGE                                          
    DPMS                                            
    DRI2                                            
    GLX                                             
    Generic Event Extension                         
    MIT-SCREEN-SAVER                                
    MIT-SHM                                         
    NV-CONTROL                                      
    NV-GLX                                          
    RENDER                                          
    SHAPE                                           
    SYNC                                            
    X-Resource                                      
    XC-MISC                                         
    XFIXES                                          
    XFree86-VidModeExtension                        
    XINERAMA                                        
    XInputExtension                                                                     
    XKEYBOARD                                                                           
    XTEST                                                                               
    XVideo                                                                              
    XVideo-MotionCompensation                                                           
default screen number:    0                                                             
number of screens:    1                                                                 
                                                                                        
screen #0:                                                                              
  print screen:    no                                                                   
  dimensions:    3280x1200 pixels (868x346 millimeters)                                 
  resolution:    96x88 dots per inch                                                    
  depths (7):    24, 1, 4, 8, 15, 16, 32                                                
  root window id:    0x329                                                              
  depth of root window:    24 planes                                                    
  number of colormaps:    minimum 1, maximum 1
 
Old 07-21-2009, 09:05 AM   #9
GrapefruiTgirl
Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550
I just noticed that when I try the 'xrandr' option in the 'Extensions' section at the bottom of the file, the X server hangs and won't start :/
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quick question involving ext4/ext3 and dual boot Ssurno Linux - General 1 06-11-2009 01:38 PM
Question on ext3 => ext4 conversion in Jaunty WillingToLikeLinux Ubuntu 2 05-28-2009 10:14 AM
Slack64-Current / NVIDIA Driver / possible bug? slackass Slackware 2 05-21-2009 12:02 AM
Ext4 questions jmite Linux - Newbie 2 03-31-2009 06:50 AM
ext4 on current? grissiom Slackware 7 03-12-2009 07:27 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration