LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 11-04-2005, 07:04 AM   #1
alt20
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Slack or ZipSlack?


Hi,

Linux newbie here. I'm wondering whether to use Slack or Zipslack. I would ideally like the following characteristics:

--not cpu-intensive: it's for an old laptop which I'm making into a video/audio client, so could do with using as little of the cpu and ram on running linux, and more on the video, as possible!
--quick to boot: this is important. I don't want to have to wait ages each time I want to listen to my music
--allows me to use videolan
--allows me to set up wired and wireless networks

Thanks

Alt
 
Old 11-04-2005, 09:04 AM   #2
KeithE
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Distribution: Mint, Slackware
Posts: 88

Rep: Reputation: 19
I think ZipSlack is usable only on DOS-based systems (MS-DOS, Win3.x/95/98/ME). I don't think it'll work on NT-based systems like Win2K or XP.

I don't know how well Slackware works on laptops since I don't own one, but you may have to use that or another distro.
 
Old 11-04-2005, 09:05 AM   #3
dinolinux
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware 11, Solaris 10, Solaris 9, Sourcemage 0.9.6
Posts: 322

Rep: Reputation: 31
There is no difference in ZipSlack and "standard" Slackware. ZipSlack is just a smaller edition. For your needs, just burn a cd and install the full Slackware thing
 
Old 11-04-2005, 09:06 AM   #4
Artanicus
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Finland
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Gentoo, Slackware
Posts: 827

Rep: Reputation: 31
If thats what you need I strongly recomend you go for Slackware instead of zipslack. The difference isnt that much except that zipslack is missing alot of stuff that you would probably want.. Also you will probably get more out of the machine with a fullblown slackware..

How old is the machine? How much diskspace, ram etc?

The default slackware boot is pretty slow IMO, but you can speed it up alot by disabling/uninstalling daemons you dont need and rescheduling the non-essential ones that you still need to boot up after initial boot. this will tell you more on that: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...=at+5+min+boot
 
Old 11-04-2005, 09:12 AM   #5
alt20
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 3

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks for the advice. Think Slackware is the way forward!
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Zipslack wallie Linux - Software 20 05-19-2005 08:46 PM
ZipSlack... GCR Slackware 2 01-28-2005 06:12 PM
[ZipSlack 10.0] Installing KDE on ZipSlack - HELP!!! Rookie One Slackware - Installation 3 12-03-2004 01:39 PM
Slack 8.1 Zipslack 9.1 compiling 2.6.0 o0sketchdude0o Slackware 4 01-07-2004 03:32 PM
Slack 7.1 and ZipSlack fuelinux Slackware 1 10-02-2003 09:03 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration