LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 08-07-2006, 06:24 AM   #1
Old_Fogie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,515

Rep: Reputation: 62
Slack 10.2's default 2.4.31 kernel - how do I security patch it?


Hi all,

I've noticed throughout my time here that some people mention that there are "security" fixes/patches for the stock 2.4.31 IDE Generic kernel.

I went through the security notices pages for both 2005/2006 at Slackware's site, and I don't see anything listed there for kerenel.

Can someone please point me to where this advisory is, and/or where I can get Pat's fix for it?

Thank you.
 
Old 08-07-2006, 06:35 AM   #2
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,115

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
The kernel is not taken into account when fixing security issues. Slackware has always come with (near) pristine unpatched kernels. I don't even know if old kernels get fixed and patched by the kernel team.

I guess you should install one of the recent 2.4 kernels from source (using the .config file from your running kernel as a template to jumpstart the source configuration process) if you are concerned with your current kernel's secirity level.

Eric
 
Old 08-07-2006, 06:46 AM   #3
masonm
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Following the white rabbit
Distribution: Slackware64 13.37 Android 4.0
Posts: 2,244

Rep: Reputation: 45
Honestly if you're going to compile a new kernel anyway I'd go with a new 2.6 series kernel as you get a bit snappier kernel with a good deal better hardware support.
 
Old 08-07-2006, 11:10 AM   #4
Old_Fogie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,515

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 62
Ok ty gent's.

I was just "fearful" as I see some people make statements that the kernel 2.4.31 is 'in-secure' at this time. That comment is somewhere in the mega-thread for the next slackware.

Ok, I'll slap in another kernel for just in case of reasons, I have the drive space.

But it is good for me to hear/know that I am responsible to check for security patches to my slackware kernels and not leave it to Pat.

I was not aware of that. I had assumed that since other distor's (like opensuse for example) issue security patched kernels when they arise.

Definitely a good learning point here thanks again.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
slack 10.2 default 2.4 kernel and Ram limits ? mortal Slackware 2 11-16-2005 09:26 PM
slack 10 default kernel (2.4.26) and alsa problem perfect_circle Slackware 4 01-28-2005 04:51 PM
Security kernel option: Default Linux Capabilities orgee Linux - Security 1 10-10-2004 07:55 AM
Security patch info for a default version 9 install? jlangelier Slackware 1 06-26-2003 02:13 PM
Why my RH 7.2's smtp port haven't open default? explorer1979 Linux - General 3 06-04-2002 07:24 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration