LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

View Poll Results: Should slackware get modernized for today's computers?
Yes 11 7.01%
No 146 92.99%
Voters: 157. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 09-09-2011, 12:10 AM   #76
NoStressHQ
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2010
Location: Lausanne - Switzerland ( Bordeaux - France / Montreal - QC - Canada)
Distribution: Slackware Leet - 32/64bit
Posts: 271

Rep: Reputation: 87

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReaperX7 View Post
... the answer is NO.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PLQK0Gu2Jk
 
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 09-09-2011, 03:53 AM   #77
chrisretusn
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 462

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Just a general two cents worth here.

I don't get it? Why do some folks seem to insist that dependency checking should be added to Slackware. There are boat loads of distributions that provide dependency checking. Like I said before, if you want dependency checking look elsewhere.

Dependency checking means I must depend on someones else's preferences. With dependency checking I must accept what the packager has deemed necessary. Normally is an everything plus the kitchen sink or a group of packages to select features from. I don't want that. If I do my own dependency checking, I can roll my own package exactly the way I want it.

I don't get what is so unmodernized about Slackware either, works fine all of of my computers, both new and old.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-09-2011, 04:15 AM   #78
rico974
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: Reunion Island
Distribution: Slackware current
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
NO!

---------- Post added 09-09-11 at 04:16 AM ----------

and this was my first post too
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-09-2011, 04:30 AM   #79
D1ver
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2010
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 527
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 126Reputation: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD View Post
Slackware runs fine on my rather new main computer.

I find your suggestion rather funny. You are running Arch, have not used Slackware for years and nonetheless you are making suggestions how Slackware should be. Why?
Most (if not all) Slackers are happy with Slackware the way it is. No need for automatic dependency resolution here, had that with Debian, don't want it. Also, as suggested above, if you want optimization run Slackware64 (or Gentoo).
I agree with Tobi. I built the beefiest computer I could afford and Slackware 64 runs like a bat out of hell.
 
Old 09-09-2011, 04:35 AM   #80
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 6,702
Blog Entries: 51

Rep: Reputation: 1244Reputation: 1244Reputation: 1244Reputation: 1244Reputation: 1244Reputation: 1244Reputation: 1244Reputation: 1244Reputation: 1244
I should think Frank111 has got the message by now, don't you?
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-09-2011, 05:06 AM   #81
fotoguy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Brisbane Queensland Australia
Distribution: KirraMail Live Email Server
Posts: 1,275

Rep: Reputation: 61
Being a slackware user now since version 9.0 I would have to say "NO". I use slack for my desktop, servers and also my live distro. I've run it on all my computers from old hardware to new, my current is running slackware64 on my quad core, it runs flawlessly. One thing I like is it simplicity, no package dependencies, also I do everything by editing scripts and the command line, I don't like fancy gui's, too many bells and whistles.
 
Old 09-09-2011, 06:34 AM   #82
Phorize
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 216

Rep: Reputation: 22
meh
 
0 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-09-2011, 08:14 AM   #83
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 6,702
Blog Entries: 51

Rep: Reputation: 1244Reputation: 1244Reputation: 1244Reputation: 1244Reputation: 1244Reputation: 1244Reputation: 1244Reputation: 1244Reputation: 1244
Since questions like this poll have cropped up before, and probably will do again, maybe this thread should be made a sticky - to save everybody's time?
 
Old 09-09-2011, 08:20 AM   #84
sycamorex
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: London
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 5,417
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951Reputation: 951
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianL View Post
Since questions like this poll have cropped up before, and probably will do again, maybe this thread should be made a sticky - to save everybody's time?
IMO, it's newbies that tend to start such polls and at the same time it is newbies that are less likely to read stickies. Having said that, I think it's a good idea because somebody will be able to direct a person to the relevant sticky thread.
 
Old 09-09-2011, 08:46 AM   #85
unclejed613
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 316

Rep: Reputation: 25
i voted no. Slack is fine as it is. and it's STABLE. Slack is not a buggy "bleeding edge" distro. Slack is not a windows lookalike. Slack can be tweaked to be whatever you need.... server, workstation, media center, development environment, even a tablet OS. granted, there's a learning curve for Slack, but it's worth it.
 
Old 09-09-2011, 11:15 AM   #86
dizzi
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Distribution: Slackware, Mepis LiveCD
Posts: 146

Rep: Reputation: 15
"Raaatid" - to quote some of my Jamaican friends. Reading most of the posts here, one may get the impression that the pollster has desecrated a sacrosanct object, personally challenged the respondents to a duel or has threatened to banished them or their beloved distro to oblivion . The individual posted a poll on an operating system - yes an operating system. Some of the insults and ridicule are really unnecessary. The poll has even described as "stupid". It would be interesting to find out how less zealous, non-Slackware devotees would describe some of the responses .

Raaatid
 
0 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-09-2011, 11:36 AM   #87
ponce
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Pisa, Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,314

Rep: Reputation: 816Reputation: 816Reputation: 816Reputation: 816Reputation: 816Reputation: 816Reputation: 816
I think you got it wrong: this is a fun thread _o/ \o_ (just look at the title! )

Last edited by ponce; 09-09-2011 at 11:41 AM.
 
Old 09-09-2011, 11:42 AM   #88
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 14,891
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 3808Reputation: 3808Reputation: 3808Reputation: 3808Reputation: 3808Reputation: 3808Reputation: 3808Reputation: 3808Reputation: 3808Reputation: 3808Reputation: 3808
Quote:
Originally Posted by dizzi View Post
The individual posted a poll on an operating system - yes an operating system. Some of the insults and ridicule are really unnecessary. The poll has even described as "stupid".
The OP posted suggestions (that where made a felt thousand times on this forums) for a distribution (that he hadn't used for years) to modernize that distro (although Slackware is up to date, writing this with Firefox 6 on a totally working Phenom 2 X6 machine) while using a different distro (and not at least trying a new version of the distro in question before making any suggestions for modernization).

How would you call that?
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-09-2011, 11:46 AM   #89
ponce
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Pisa, Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,314

Rep: Reputation: 816Reputation: 816Reputation: 816Reputation: 816Reputation: 816Reputation: 816Reputation: 816
a chance to fool with the OP just a little? (for fun )

Last edited by ponce; 09-09-2011 at 11:18 PM.
 
Old 09-09-2011, 12:10 PM   #90
DavidMcCann
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: CentOS, Salix
Posts: 2,830

Rep: Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728
I voted "no" even though Slackware is one of the few distros I've never tried! I like the extras in Salix, but no Slackware, no Salix. I suspect the simplicity of Slack is the reason for the reliability of its packages. As for the objection to supporting i386, there's still a demand: not everyone throws things a way while they still work. The OPs next suggestion would probably be dropping support for 32-bit.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Look at what I managed to do today with slackware! cereal83 Slackware 22 04-01-2006 02:41 AM
"computers that are thousands of times more powerful than those that exist today." rksprst General 12 02-03-2005 07:25 PM
Slackware 10.0 RC1 Today Released!!!! cHarOn99 Slackware 4 06-16-2004 01:21 PM
Slackware Quirks -- What do you want to see today? Astro Slackware 75 10-24-2003 09:38 AM
Slackware turns 10 years old today! Noryungi Slackware 16 07-20-2003 09:13 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration