SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
There is less than 12 hours left to vote in the 2015 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards. Click here to go to the polls. Vote now and make sure your voice is heard!
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I've been using only Slackware since I started using Linux. I'm very innocent, because I never attempted to use any other distro. I actually enjoy the command line interface - I'm an old DOS fan (let's face, there is no better way to get under the hood of the PC than DOS, even for Linux fans).
I hear scary things about other Linux Distros, but I feel like the innocent child who wants to leave the secure confines of his abode. Is it worth trying out other distros?
You see, nothing really tops Slackware, but there are times when there is just too much configuring and other busy stuff to deal with and wish there would be a faster way to do things. Of course I'll never change my own system to any other distro, but I can't afford to go through a lot of configuration when installing Linux on my friends' computers (call it a Linux crusade).
Any suggestions would be great!
Last edited by Murdock1979; 07-26-2005 at 06:19 PM.
The only way to know is to try another flavour. Maybe an RPM based distro like Fedora or Suse? You could sit there all night chewing the fat over which to choose, but if you are anything like me (and maybe a few others around here?!) you'll miss the Slackware 'thing'. Don't quite know how to describe it, its like a well fitting shoe, kinda....
I used debian before, it is very pro, and at the same time it has the best package tool, even better them RPM... apt-get with .deb packages are a blasting combo and i think you will enjoy it if you are used to slackware, debian gives you the easy of instaling and configuring things and at the same time you have the control of the line based commands distro...
I often manage other distributions so i tried alot of them.
But, theres nothing like the simplicity of slackware.
And you will scream 'stupid distro let me do this' it happens to me sometimes.
I love linux all of them but slackware is where i feel home.
For everything u win in gui u loose simplicity.
But try everything out maybe gentoo or debian maybe even suse.
But i think u will be back to slackware again.
But it's always good to know many distributions so try them.
Maybe get some Livecd's to play with diffrent distributions before u make an choice.
Remember whats great for me can be wrong for u.
Originally posted by maginotjr I used debian before, it is very pro, and at the same time it has the best package tool, even better them RPM... apt-get with .deb packages are a blasting combo and i think you will enjoy it if you are used to slackware, debian gives you the easy of instaling and configuring things and at the same time you have the control of the line based commands distro...
Personally, I couldn't get to grips with Debian. I liked apt-get, but I just found Debian did things a bit differently to other distros I'd used (I can't remember what things, specifically). It was just a pain in the rear end for me, I'm comfortable using Slack (despite not knowing much about how Linux works, etc). Just my 2 cents (or pence! ).
IMO, to the untrained eye, different distros seem different. But once you get the hang of compiling, and script editing, you realise that most distros are more or less the same.
I still can't find a better distro than slack.. in terms of security, stability, ease of use, down to earth, etc... (this is just my oppinion). And i wanted to try a true unix OS.. I had a choice between freebsd or solaris, and i assumed solaris would look better on a CV , so i gave it a shot.
Solaris 10 is stable and nice, and its even better to use with the unofficial packages.
However, what does show the difference between distributions is the community. And so far, i can't find a better community than Slackware's.
If it is the configuration stuff that pains you, I would try one of the big distros that are marketed that way, Mandriva, Suse, Fedora. If your want a Debian based so you can get apt-get but still get some automagic configuration, maybe Ubuntu or Mepis.
If you have been with Slackware as long as it sounds, you'll be back :-)
Another consideration, install openbsd and find out what a pita it is to get set up.... Slack will seem like a walk in the park.
I am really happy that I found Slackware. Actually, it was only a coincidence, because way back when downloading was slower, I only had the time to download one CD, and Slackware comes on one CD (as opposed to other that are two or more). And then we bonded.
Anyway, does anyone think RedHat linux is worthwhile looking into?
I could fill books with what I don't know about Linux..
Mess around with a lot of them, lately playing with fedora core 4.. It seems nice, a little bit of pep and it seems to me the easiest to get xine working properly and YUM helps a lot.
Had to read for 3 days before I attempted to install gentoo, played with it for a few hours, then zeroed the drive.
The SuSE family seems okay to me especially if you're just migrating from winblos.
Debian is a lot of fun but the .deb thing and the "Debian Way" leave a sour taste in my mouth for some reason.
Yesterday I was messing around with SuSE 9.0 pro, installed all the C tools, automake, etc.etc.etc.and still had to install a million libraries to compile Gnu Backgammon-0.15.
Today I installed Slack 10.1 ( again ) and Gnu Backgammon compiled and installed without much fuss and its' performance ( Gnu Backgammons ) is far superior then it was in SuSE. Let me re-iterate, I ain't the sharpest knife in the draw, and I'm still trying to unglue my bottom lip from the mother-board after upgrading a stick of ram, but with all that non-sense being said, and as someone else suggested, try dual-booting Slack and Something else.. Run em back to back and weigh it out for yourself.
Personally I like Slack, A lot, Mostly because it just makes simple sense.. Everything about it.. No Wizzards, or special incantations necessary to re-bake a kernel.. .tgz is brilliant... No ridgid rules as to where the kernel source tree is located, no rpm or .deb nonsense, extract the kernel in your kitchen sink if you want, and as long as ya sym-link to it properly, it works. SOOOOOooooo ! After having said a whole bunch of nothing, give em all a whirl, but remember that once you go Slack, you never go Back.