[SOLVED] rendering and glxgears after november updates

anti_user · 11-19-2010, 05:21 AM

Hello again!
I have hp laptop 6910p and giving issue with glxgears.

Code:

init@ntagil-it:~$ glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh.  The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.830 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.841 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.843 FPS
XIO:  fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server ":0.0"
      after 1923 requests (1923 known processed) with 0 events remaining.

Code:

init@ntagil-it:~$ uname -a
Linux ntagil-it 2.6.35.8 #5 SMP Fri Nov 19 10:40:25 YEKT 2010 i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     T8300  @ 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

Code:

init@ntagil-it:~$ glxinfo |grep render
direct rendering: Yes
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Intel(R) 965GM GEM 20100330 DEVELOPMENT x86/MMX/SSE2

Code:

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 0c) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
	Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 30be
	Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0
	Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 43
	Region 0: Memory at e4400000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M]
	Region 2: Memory at d0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
	Region 4: I/O ports at 4000 [size=8]
	Expansion ROM at <unassigned> [disabled]
	Capabilities: [90] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-
		Address: fee0300c  Data: 4179
	Capabilities: [d0] Power Management version 3
		Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
		Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
		Bridge: PM- B3+
	Kernel driver in use: i915

00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 0c)
	Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 30be
	Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0
	Region 0: Memory at e4500000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M]
	Capabilities: [d0] Power Management version 3
		Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
		Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
		Bridge: PM- B3+

Im put Xorg.0.log for more detail

adamk75 · 11-19-2010, 05:30 AM

So what's the issue you are having? Nothing you've posted indicates any problem.

Adam

anti_user · 11-19-2010, 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamk75

So what's the issue you are having? Nothing you've posted indicates any problem.

Adam

thinking, that its low FPS, usual this indicates about 700 FPS

adamk75 · 11-19-2010, 05:33 AM

Quote:

Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.

It explains why it's roughly 60 fps.

Adam

anti_user · 11-19-2010, 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamk75

It explains why it's roughly 60 fps.

Adam

Hmmm, how I understand, this is normal situation?
In this way how to find real FPS?

adamk75 · 11-19-2010, 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anti_user

Hmmm, how I understand, this is normal situation?

Really depends on the driver and the application.

Quote:

In this way how to find real FPS?

I do not know if it's possible to get glxgears or the intel driver to not vsync by default. However, you really shouldn't be using glxgears to get any determination of performance. I would recommend one of the applications mentioned here: http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Benchmarking

Adam

anti_user · 11-19-2010, 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamk75

Really depends on the driver and the application.

I do not know if it's possible to get glxgears or the intel driver to not vsync by default. However, you really shouldn't be using glxgears to get any determination of performance. I would recommend one of the applications mentioned here: http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Benchmarking

Adam

Thanks, Adam