LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Slackware (http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/)
-   -   rendering and glxgears after november updates (http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/rendering-and-glxgears-after-november-updates-845284/)

anti_user 11-19-2010 05:21 AM

rendering and glxgears after november updates
 
1 Attachment(s)
Hello again!
I have hp laptop 6910p and giving issue with glxgears.
Code:

init@ntagil-it:~$ glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh.  The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.830 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.841 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.843 FPS
XIO:  fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server ":0.0"
      after 1923 requests (1923 known processed) with 0 events remaining.

Code:

init@ntagil-it:~$ uname -a
Linux ntagil-it 2.6.35.8 #5 SMP Fri Nov 19 10:40:25 YEKT 2010 i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU    T8300  @ 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

Code:

init@ntagil-it:~$ glxinfo |grep render
direct rendering: Yes
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Intel(R) 965GM GEM 20100330 DEVELOPMENT x86/MMX/SSE2

Code:

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 0c) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
        Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 30be
        Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
        Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
        Latency: 0
        Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 43
        Region 0: Memory at e4400000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M]
        Region 2: Memory at d0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
        Region 4: I/O ports at 4000 [size=8]
        Expansion ROM at <unassigned> [disabled]
        Capabilities: [90] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-
                Address: fee0300c  Data: 4179
        Capabilities: [d0] Power Management version 3
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
                Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
                Bridge: PM- B3+
        Kernel driver in use: i915

00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 0c)
        Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 30be
        Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
        Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
        Latency: 0
        Region 0: Memory at e4500000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M]
        Capabilities: [d0] Power Management version 3
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
                Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
                Bridge: PM- B3+

Im put Xorg.0.log for more detail

adamk75 11-19-2010 05:30 AM

So what's the issue you are having? Nothing you've posted indicates any problem.

Adam

anti_user 11-19-2010 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamk75 (Post 4164200)
So what's the issue you are having? Nothing you've posted indicates any problem.

Adam

thinking, that its low FPS, usual this indicates about 700 FPS

adamk75 11-19-2010 05:33 AM

Quote:

Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
It explains why it's roughly 60 fps.

Adam

anti_user 11-19-2010 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamk75 (Post 4164203)
It explains why it's roughly 60 fps.

Adam

Hmmm, how I understand, this is normal situation?
In this way how to find real FPS?

adamk75 11-19-2010 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anti_user (Post 4164206)
Hmmm, how I understand, this is normal situation?

Really depends on the driver and the application.

Quote:

In this way how to find real FPS?
I do not know if it's possible to get glxgears or the intel driver to not vsync by default. However, you really shouldn't be using glxgears to get any determination of performance. I would recommend one of the applications mentioned here: http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Benchmarking

Adam

anti_user 11-19-2010 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamk75 (Post 4164211)
Really depends on the driver and the application.



I do not know if it's possible to get glxgears or the intel driver to not vsync by default. However, you really shouldn't be using glxgears to get any determination of performance. I would recommend one of the applications mentioned here: http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Benchmarking

Adam

Thanks, Adam


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 PM.