Recommendation - Software sets - Break up - Disk Space
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Recommendation - Software sets - Break up - Disk Space
Hi, Many year Slackware user here, it's how I really learned Linux... of course. And Thank You! I have been reading forums about what people would like changed in Slackware, software sets and full install, pertaining to disk space. Understanding that disk space is cheap and a full install will have less hassle with possible dependency issues, that is not my issue.
We are well past the floppy install days so the size of the software sets don't matter. What I think could be advantageous and slackers might like is to have just a few more options as to software installed. I also know about tagfiles, expert install, etc. but for just a little more definition I think people would like to have a few more customized install options. Less is more, security issues, less to upgrade, etc.
Nothing major, but maybe break up 'N' by different types of programs. (I go though and uninstall so many apps, like all chat & news apps.) Separate basic networking stuff (required, like system tools) from network apps. Or group by what one would see in the GUI app menu.
I am having a harder and harder time upgrading Slackware because I'm still trying to squeeze into a 5 GB volume.
Could you please think about & consider breaking up the AP, N, XAP software sets?
I sent this email to Mr. Volkerding on 10/13/11. No reply. I have to assume that no response is a negative answer. Hence my posting here. Oh well. Maybe someone, me if I get time, will make custom .tag files for different uses. Thanks.
The power of Slackware is choice and freedom!
Nate
I have installed linux distros on various hardware with limited space and resources and i can appreciate the dilemma. You might consider Vector Linux Light. Version 7.0 was just released and it is a slackware based distro that fits on a CD. IIRC its installed size was less than 2 gigs. It has a few window manager choices, including fluxbox and many of the advantages of slackware.
The organisation of the 'disksets' certainly could do with a bit of a revamp to better reflect today's environments and needs. I don't think anyone would argue with that. But I suspect there are much more pressing issues the devs are working on, and they simply won't have the time to spend on these sorts of issues.
Personally, I'd like to see the 'n' set go away. it's a mishmash of applications, server daemons and system utilities that really don't belong together.
The existing packages are broken up as such to reflect their nature as to what they are used for. There's no need to break them up farther. The design of Slackware and even it's directory structure is centered around simplicity of usage, understanding, and functionality.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.