Recommendation for a lightweight and eyeCandy Desktop Manager
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
What is it you don't like about Xfce? With the right themes I think it looks great.
Agreed.. just find that the loading up the desktop when first boot up is a little slow. I am just fiddling around with the desktop thingy.. so i might just stick with XFCE.. see how it goes.
Incidentally, you can replace Xfce default WM with KWin for some really useful as well as "candy" options. In fact with the "kwin --replace" command (see below link for variations) you can just try it temporarily as it will revert upon logout. It also fixes screen tearing and allows control over animation response speeds for snappier or slower feel. The list is quite long as to how much opens up with KWin as WM/Compositor.
There are numerous posts and videos on it and this is just one
PS While I really enjoyed several versions of Enlightenment, most notably e17, since e19 it has changed a lot and most find the changes for the better. Development was a bit slow until Samsung and a few others got involved. Ultimately they want to use it as a template for mobile phone use where "gorgeous, yet snappy" rules.
LXDE is obsolete, really. The project merged with Razor-Qt to become LXQT (a Qt5 based lightweight desktop environment).
I have updated the Slackware page on the LXDE Wiki with this information.
maybe I am misunderstanding, but if you are referring to the gtk+2 version, AFAIK, no, it's not: that is still mantained by Andrej N. Gritsenko.
others (dgod, Julien Lavergne, etc.) are also contributing stuff (porting it to gtk+3, for example).
if instead you are referring to Razor-Qt, that yes is obsoleted by LXQt.
Quote:
The project merged with Razor-Qt to become LXQT (a Qt5 based lightweight desktop environment).
I have updated the Slackware page on the LXDE Wiki with this information.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.