Distrowatch and Slackware
It is written in Distrowatch about Slackware:
"Slackware Linux, created by Patrick Volkerding in 1992, is the oldest surviving Linux distribution. Forked from the now-discontinued SLS project, Slackware 1.0 came on 24 floppy disks and was built on top of Linux kernel version 0.99pl11-alpha. It quickly became the most popular Linux distribution, with some estimates putting its market share to as much as 80% of all Linux installations in 1995. Its popularity decreased dramatically with the arrival of Red Hat Linux and other, more user-friendly distributions, but Slackware Linux still remains a much-appreciated operating system among the more technically-oriented system administrators and desktop users. Slackware Linux is a highly technical, clean distribution, with only a very limited number of custom utilities. It uses a simple, text-based system installer and a comparatively primitive package management system that does not resolve software dependencies. As a result, Slackware is considered one of the cleanest and least buggy distributions available today - the lack of Slackware-specific enhancements reduces the likelihood of new bugs being introduced into the system. All configuration is done by editing text files. There is a saying in the Linux community that if you learn Red Hat, you'll know Red Hat, but if you learn Slackware, you'll know Linux. This is particularly true today when many other Linux distributions keep developing heavily customised products to meet the needs of less technical Linux users. While this philosophy of simplicity has its fans, the fact is that in today's world, Slackware Linux is increasingly becoming a "core system" upon which new, custom solutions are built, rather than a complete distribution with a wide variety of supported software. The only exception is the server market, where Slackware remains popular, though even here, the distribution's complex upgrade procedure and lack of officially supported automated tools for security updates makes it increasingly uncompetitive. Slackware's conservative attitude towards the system's base components means that it requires much manual post-installation work before it can be tuned into a modern desktop system. Pros: Considered highly stable, clean and largely bug-free, strong adherence to UNIX principles Cons: Limited number of officially supported applications; conservative in terms of base package selection; complex upgrade procedure Software package management: "pkgtool" using TXZ packages Available editions: Installation CDs and DVD for 32-bit (i486) and 64-bit (x86_64) processors Suggested Slackware-based alternatives: Zenwalk Linux (desktop), Salix (desktop, live CD), Porteus (live CD with KDE, LXDE, MATE, Razor-qt or Xfce), VectorLinux (desktop) Other distributions with similar philosophies: Arch Linux, Frugalware Linux" Reference: https://distrowatch.com/dwres-mobile.php?resource=major It is true that the Slackware uses a simple, text-based system installer and a comparatively primitive package management system that does not resolve software dependencies? It is true that the on Slackware all configuration is done by editing text files? It is true that the upgrade procedure of Slackware is complex? |
Quote:
And yes, Slackware's package management software is relatively uncomplex. You can install, upgrade, and remove packages, but it won't resolve any dependencies. But, that isn't an issue, because if you install all of Slackware, all dependencies will be met and if you use https://slackbuilds.org (commonly called SBo), it will let you know of any additional dependencies these programs may have. There are many community tools that help automate this process. Quote:
Quote:
If you're talking about upgrading from one version to another, it might be a bit more complex than other distros (although, I don't know how other distros handle it, so it is strictly speculation on my part), but I don't think it is difficult. Pat will cover how to upgrade on your install media in the UPGRADE.TXT file and possibly CHANGES_AND_HINTS.TXT. However, many people, even if not recommended, will not read those documents and still upgrade using slackpkg, which is pretty simple. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I love Slackware. :) |
Hitest, you are correct, I guess old himers is getting to me. I meant to say 13.1...
|
installation is not difficult, partitioning the drive is the only real hurdle which is easily overcome by reading instructions before starting and making notes or printing them...you can also "cheat" and use a liveCD that has gparted or another program to partition the drive then reboot into Slackware installer and it will pick up the partitions, just select how to mount/label them (ie: /root, /home etc...).
You can watch quite a few youtube tutorials regarding installation, perhaps even practice on a VM first. It really is not as bad as all the naysayers say.....If anything I find it to be quite the opposite. :) If you are timid after all this, then get your feet wet with SalixOS then either just run that or after you are Slackblessed, then install Slackware. |
It would have been nice of you to post the link...
Top Ten Distributions: An overview of today's top distributions |
Quote:
|
I wouldn't use "primitive" to describe pkgtool since that has a connotation of something akin to a less than directly effective Rube Goldberg "solution. I'd call it "fundamental" since it does one very important job extremely effectively without risking the base install and no more. The frosting on that cake is that any problems are extremely minor and trivial and immediate to troubleshoot.
I don't consider the upgrade process particularly complicated especially compared to figuring out what went wrong if anything does in an automatic system. THAT is a bloody nightmare. I don't hold it against those who do (much) but I don't use slackpkg now and never will. Convenience makes us weak and I'll choose strong any day given the choice and slackware is one of the very few still offering such a choice. The only real downside I see in Slackware dependency is mine. I honestly don't know what I would do if Slackware were to cease to exist. AFAIK there is nothing quite like it. |
Quote:
-- kjh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Happy Slacking! |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 AM. |