LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-11-2013, 06:00 PM   #391
eloi
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Posts: 227

Rep: Reputation: 61
What I'd like to see


I've sent an email to Joe Wingbermuehle, creator, developer and maintainer of JWM (Joe Window Manager), congratulating and thanking him for his work and to let him know about a bug.

This window manager, after adding few things and cleaning few bugs will be the better X11 window manager out there.

I advice everybody to download the latest snapshot:

http://joewing.net/projects/jwm/snap...wm-726.tar.bz2

Compile it and get amazed of how a clean and tiny code is able to do all what you need in a graphical interface.

It's not necessary to install it, just add the path to the compiled executable on your xinitrc home file.

It doesn't reinvent the wheel like other WMs and Desktop Prosthesis, its taskbar is able to shallow old tiny, and irreplaceable apps like Xbiff or XLoad (in the same way FVWM does).

Opposite to follow the "more is better" today's idiocy, bloating the software to satisfy God and Devil, if some none vital feature could mean complicating the code more than necessary, adding bugs and security issues, Joe removes it. A good signal that it's not his priority being beloved by the crowd. He didn't ignore my mail considering me no trustworthy just because I find annoying to ventilate in some forum how I contribute to the cause. Besides to be a clever developer he's a gentleman. He just answered me and fixed the bug. Period.

All these characteristics are what I think is a well understood KISS philosophy and what I want to see in any software or distribution, developer or maintainer.

Walter
 
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 04-12-2013, 02:17 AM   #392
Lockywolf
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Posts: 683

Rep: Reputation: 253Reputation: 253Reputation: 253
I don't remember posting here, but OpenMOTIF is now LPGL, and also CDE is openosource and developed here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/

I think, Slackware, as the most true "UNIX" among Linuxes definitely should include CDE.
 
Old 04-12-2013, 10:47 AM   #393
ttk
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2012
Location: Sebastopol, CA
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 1,038
Blog Entries: 27

Rep: Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484
Quote:
Originally Posted by eloi View Post
It doesn't reinvent the wheel like other WMs and Desktop Prosthesis, its taskbar is able to shallow old tiny, and irreplaceable apps like Xbiff or XLoad (in the same way FVWM does).
Thank you for pointing this project out. The screenshot looks quite nice. I am a long-time FVWM user. It is an extremely stable WM with minimal overhead. Could you explain what I might find more appealing about JWM, please?

I didn't see a virtual desktop display in the screenshot. Is it just tucked away somewhere? I really depend on having virtual desktops (usually a 5x5 grid) for organizing my work.

Thanks again,
-- TTK
 
Old 04-12-2013, 11:36 AM   #394
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by ttk View Post
I didn't see a virtual desktop display in the screenshot. Is it just tucked away somewhere? I really depend on having virtual desktops (usually a 5x5 grid) for organizing my work.
The configuration page mentions it defaults to a 1x4 virtual desktop arrangement (which is exactly how my fvwm is configured). (Or do you mean the "virtual desktop" in the classic sense of having a single desktop five times the size of your physical display? I didn't notice anything about that.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ttk View Post
Could you explain what I might find more appealing about JWM, please?
I had the same question - fvwm and I have fused to become one thing and I always wonder what another window manager could have to pull us apart.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-12-2013, 02:20 PM   #395
ponce
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Pisa, Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,097

Rep: Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lockywolf View Post
I don't remember posting here, but OpenMOTIF is now LPGL, and also CDE is openosource and developed here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/

I think, Slackware, as the most true "UNIX" among Linuxes definitely should include CDE.
have you tried it? I do.
It has been released as opensource recently with a codebase of 15 years ago: I think it still has a long way to go before most of the problems of porting its components to today's operating systems are ironed out (just a few are usable).
It's still at alpha stage: if you are interested in it, I suggest to follow their mailing list to have an idea of the state of it.

I'm waiting for it to be a little more usable too, because it's the first unix desktop environment I worked on (with a Sun UltraSPARC).

Last edited by ponce; 04-12-2013 at 02:28 PM.
 
Old 04-12-2013, 03:28 PM   #396
sinic
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2009
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: 4
I can't believe nobody mentioned tmux yet.
 
Old 04-12-2013, 08:20 PM   #397
ttk
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2012
Location: Sebastopol, CA
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 1,038
Blog Entries: 27

Rep: Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484
Quote:
Originally Posted by slakmagik View Post
The configuration page mentions it defaults to a 1x4 virtual desktop arrangement (which is exactly how my fvwm is configured).
Thank you! I overlooked that.

Quote:
(Or do you mean the "virtual desktop" in the classic sense of having a single desktop five times the size of your physical display? I didn't notice anything about that.)
Nope, you understood me right the first time.
 
Old 04-13-2013, 04:54 AM   #398
ruario
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,557

Rep: Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761
Quote:
Originally Posted by sinic View Post
I can't believe nobody mentioned tmux yet.
tmux is indeed awesome. I use it all the time but it and libevent are quick and easy to compile. Slackware doesn't need to include everything out of the box, rather it is better that Pat focuses on providing a decent base which everyone else can build upon.

Some of the suggestions that are expected by new users and take time to compile (e.g. libreoffice) make more sense to be included by default IMHO, rather than large collections of small utilities that only a few people will use actually use.
 
Old 04-13-2013, 07:49 AM   #399
edorig
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2013
Location: France
Distribution: Slackware; Ubuntu
Posts: 134

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
ponce: I have also tried CDE on Slackware. In the mid-90s I used it (maybe it was called VUE at the time) on HP-UX. Provided rpc.portmap is running, the environment starts correctly and behaves as it used to on HP-UX, dtfile dtpad dtcalc and dtterm being already usable. The main problem is that in order to exit I have to kill the dtsession(1) process. This problem is known to exist also in AIX and Solaris, and is caused by network configuration.
For the rest, you must use the "Create Action" process to configure dtfile to open *.dvi files with xdvi, *.pdf files
with xpdf, *.ps files with gv etc... the default action being to open these files with dtpad. All that is part of
the CDE documentation that can be found on Oracle, HP, IBM or SGI Web sites.

That being said, I don't think CDE should be included in Slackware, except maybe in extra/. It would be better actually to have it as a binary package on slacky.eu or to have a Slackbuild for those who may want to play with it.
However, in order to build CDE, it is necessary to uninstall Lesstif and replace it with the LGPL Motif 2.3.4.
Since Lesstif appears to be unmaintained, it would already be good as a first step to replace Lesstif with Motif
in the next Slackware.
 
Old 04-13-2013, 08:18 AM   #400
eloi
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Posts: 227

Rep: Reputation: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by ttk View Post
Thank you for pointing this project out. The screenshot looks quite nice. I am a long-time FVWM user. It is an extremely stable WM with minimal overhead. Could you explain what I might find more appealing about JWM, please?

I didn't see a virtual desktop display in the screenshot. Is it just tucked away somewhere? I really depend on having virtual desktops (usually a 5x5 grid) for organizing my work.

Thanks again,
-- TTK
I use to advocate ideas. Technically each software has its advantages.

The better way to know if the jwm virtual desktop behavior fits your needs is trying it. It'll take less than a minute to download and compiling it (the link I included to the snapshot will not work, it was updated). Of course if you ask jwm all fvwm features you're missing my point .

A screenshot:
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	screenshot.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	166.7 KB
ID:	12311  
 
Old 04-13-2013, 04:35 PM   #401
guanx
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,176

Rep: Reputation: 233Reputation: 233Reputation: 233
Quote:
Originally Posted by sinic View Post
I can't believe nobody mentioned tmux yet.
Maybe because its functionality is so much overlapped with that of "screen", and removing "screen" might not be a good idea.
 
Old 04-14-2013, 12:47 AM   #402
ruario
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,557

Rep: Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761
Quote:
Originally Posted by guanx View Post
Maybe because its functionality is so much overlapped with that of "screen", and removing "screen" might not be a good idea.
Yeah but it is soo much better than screen!
 
Old 04-16-2013, 02:49 PM   #403
Captain Pinkeye
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2012
Location: The Czech Republic
Posts: 280

Rep: Reputation: 98
Actually, i can't understand why Slackware includes obscurities like Khangman of Kturtle. In Slackware 14.0, the KDE series got crazy compared to 13.37.

What i would like to see is maybe a little updated installer. I would really use some 'Go Back' button sometimes.
 
Old 04-16-2013, 03:18 PM   #404
Didier Spaier
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slint64-15.0
Posts: 11,057

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Pinkeye View Post
Actually, i can't understand why Slackware includes obscurities like Khangman of Kturtle.
Actually, Kturtle is an implementation of the logo language, invented mainly by Seymour Papert. Despite its childish aspect (its first use was as a tool to teach programming to very young children and at that time the turtle was a radio-controlled physical device) the logo language is a fantastic tool to learn structured and constructive programming.

PS I link to a page in French because it's more informative than its English counterpart, but you can find a lot of other references searching the web for "Seymour Papert" and/or "logo language".

Besides that there is no reason to deprive others of what you don't want to use, as already stated in this thread.

Last edited by Didier Spaier; 04-16-2013 at 03:29 PM.
 
Old 04-17-2013, 01:06 AM   #405
xj25vm
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2008
Posts: 393

Rep: Reputation: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Pinkeye View Post
What i would like to see is maybe a little updated installer. I would really use some 'Go Back' button sometimes.
Hear, hear. On one hand I like the simplicity of the Slackware installer - and nowadays I can do most of the stuff I need outside of it. But on the other hand when I was "young" :-) and newish to Linux - I think it would have helped if the installer was a bit more friendly. Maybe if it included support for md RAID in the installer - including Lilo config for RAID setups. Maybe even upgrade the installer to cope with UEFI and elilo - now that I think is becoming damn right necessary nowadays.

But then again, I can cope with the way things are - so screw those people who don't know their stuff already :-). Hmm - I can't make up my mind on that one.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
slackbuild textlive on slackware 13 missing texmf tree balamkej Slackware 4 01-21-2010 03:19 PM
A script that could mirror slackware tree from multiple servers grissiom Slackware 8 11-21-2009 07:05 PM
suggestions on family tree programs and..... Chris106 Linux - General 2 10-22-2008 07:54 AM
Linux Family Tree -- Where Slackware Fits unixfool Slackware 16 04-23-2008 11:47 PM
Slackware 9.1 tree/slapt-get question 187807 Slackware 3 02-20-2004 06:36 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration