LinuxQuestions.org
Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-08-2005, 08:39 AM   #1
Barx
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: Slack x86 current
Posts: 126

Rep: Reputation: 16
port 86 blocked on SYN_SENT


Hi all.

I have a strange problem, I can't reach remote port 86 from my system.

I have installed an IP webcam which has a bultin http server. This webcam is set to hear on port 86.

If I open in a browser <ip>:86 I should get the login window, but I don't receive nothing at all, until I get a timout.

The camera is an Intellinet ( http://www.intellinet-network.com/ipcamera/550710.php )

The webcam works perfectly, accessing from windows and or linux (distro different from slack)

I'm under a NAT , but it doesn't block port 86. In fact accessing from windows to the webcam it works perfectly.

ATM accessing from another pc with windows on the same lan there's no problems, from my box (slack current) there's no way to have it working.

I was doubting that the problem was the webcam, so I tried accessing another (identical) webcam hearing on another port (82) and I have no problems with that

I tried opening the webcam from konqueror, firefox, opera, links, lynx, telnet (telnet <ip> 86) and I never get any response.

Launching a netstat while the browser try connecting I see this line:

tcp 0 1 192.168.1.6:37174 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.:mfcobol SYN_SENT

(mfcobol corresponds on port 86)

this line remain identical until I get a timeout in the browser.

I tried from another slackware system (this time a slack 10.1 not updated) connected directly to the internet via PPP without passing a nat and the behaviour is identical to the one I see on my pc, in every aspect.

It seems that I can't receive a reply.

I'm not a network man so I don't know how to investigate deeper to find the problem.

If someone wants to try and needs IPs of the 2 webcams simply ask, I'll send them by email (or PM)

I tried searching in every way on google and on this and other forums and I can't find a solution ....
 
Old 07-08-2005, 10:52 AM   #2
keefaz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,292

Rep: Reputation: 69
Quote:
I'm under a NAT
Do you mean you run NAT iptables rules in your slackware system ?
Have you configured some iptables rules ?
try : /sbin/iptables -L -n
(to make sure)
 
Old 07-08-2005, 11:18 AM   #3
Barx
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: Slack x86 current
Posts: 126

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 16
the NAT is running on another machine, on my box iptables is not configurated at all ..

on the rc.firewall script on the 'router' there's none blocking rules, and absolutely no reference to port 86 or the mfcobol service

the script is minimal - the strict minimal need to works

this is the output of iptables -L -n: on my box

Code:
root@Trombino:/home/barx# iptables -L -n
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination

Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination

Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination
root@Trombino:/home/barx#
so there aren't rules set ..

I think the server running iptables isn't the cause of the problem because Windows boxes under this NAT haven't problems with the webcam, and I have this problem on another box which is connected to the internet via ppp and that hasn't iptables set ...
 
Old 07-08-2005, 11:42 AM   #4
keefaz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,292

Rep: Reputation: 69
When you say
Quote:
The webcam works perfectly, accessing from windows and or linux (distro different from slack)
You mean you rebooted the same machine in windows and
in other installed linux system on this machine ?
 
Old 07-11-2005, 11:05 AM   #5
Barx
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: Slack x86 current
Posts: 126

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 16
Yes rebooting to win and tryng from knoppix from the same machine I have no problems on port 86
 
Old 07-11-2005, 12:41 PM   #6
keefaz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,292

Rep: Reputation: 69
Sorry for asking, but when you boot in windows, knoppix, slackware...
is it the same IP in each case ? How is it configured, with DHCP ?
There is no rules to block IPs in your webcam camera ?
 
Old 07-12-2005, 08:19 AM   #7
Barx
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: Slack x86 current
Posts: 126

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 16
I'm using statics IPs and I always use the same network config (ip netmask GW dns)

There are no rules at all in the webcam, and another friend has the same problem connecting in dialup (using dinamic ip of course)
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SSH help/blocked port YellowFin Linux - Networking 2 09-29-2005 04:25 PM
tftp port blocked? abalmos Linux - Newbie 4 06-09-2005 10:35 AM
SMTP port blocked pierre-luc Linux - Networking 2 05-08-2005 02:53 PM
isp blocked port 25 berrance General 2 11-14-2004 08:25 AM
blocked port 80 squi Linux - Newbie 1 09-19-2003 09:57 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration