Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
11-03-2007, 02:28 PM
|
#16
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 9
Rep:
|
Slightly OT - Slackware is easy to use
Quote:
Originally Posted by AceofSpades19
I don't see what exactly is so hard about slack. The installation is straight forward,its not particularly hard. I think that people are just scared of slack for no reason, the only thing hard about it is that there is no dependency checking, but there is not alot of dependency problems
|
I couldn't agree more.
But, now here's my weird dilemma... Having used Slackware religiously for over 2 1/2 years (on both laptop and home PC), I now find all other Linux distros DIFFICULT to use. Red Hat/Fedora and Ubuntu force a GUI on you in order to configure everything, and their configuration file/directory layout doesn't always match Slackware's. Don't get me wrong, I love using KDE in Slackware, but configuring PCs/laptops/servers in a terminal is so straightforward and consistent with Slackware.
I'm sitting here at work on a Saturday afternoon trying to figure out why this RHEL4 server won't allow me to install new packages (I do realize that's a question for the RH thread), but if this were a Slackware box, I'd had this fixed yesterday.
Any suggestions? Or, is this really a problem? ;-)
|
|
|
|
11-03-2007, 02:51 PM
|
#17
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Bucharest - Romania
Distribution: Slackware 12
Posts: 57
Rep:
|
There is no substitute to the real and only Slackware!
Why accept some downdrops instead of using the original?
I have tried Slax, Vector and other slack based distros, but none is like the clean, simple and good old slackware.
The best slackware based distro is www.slackware.com
Dan
|
|
|
|
11-03-2007, 03:22 PM
|
#18
|
|
Guru
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pr1268
I'm sitting here at work on a Saturday afternoon trying to figure out why this RHEL4 server won't allow me to install new packages (I do realize that's a question for the RH thread), but if this were a Slackware box, I'd had this fixed yesterday.
Any suggestions? Or, is this really a problem? ;-)
|
Haha, I've had the same problem while running FC. It's really a very interesting story ... I must say it  ...
So, yeah, my first distro was FC4, and after a while of using it, it really pissed me off that it wouldn't let me install things without installing the dependencies first, even tho I sometimes had these installed. And at other times, the package was messed up and it could never be installed because of circular dependencies, where one package "a" needed another package "b", but also vice versa, and thus neither could be installed  ... how stupid.
So, not finding a reasonable solution (I'm wondering now if there was a way to force the package manager to install it '--force' ?, who knows) I wrote myself a script that would extract and install rpms without checking dependencies. Then I modified it to act somewhat like a package manager ... and then I switched to Slackware and realized that I had wasted my time, oh well.
Was your problem related to dependencies ? If not, well, at least I share interesting story. (my package manager was actually getting close to pkg tools, in theory at least ... although much crappier in implementation  )
|
|
|
|
11-04-2007, 02:51 PM
|
#19
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Brazil
Distribution: ImagineOS
Posts: 95
Rep:
|
Try GoblinX Mini 2.5...
|
|
|
|
11-04-2007, 03:14 PM
|
#20
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: Indiana, PA
Distribution: Slackware 14
Posts: 280
Rep:
|
Go for Slackware!
I'm a complete Linux noob and after trying out a bunch of distros I chose Slackware to use as my one-and-only. I didn't even go for the dual-boot. I reformatted and loaded Slackware only. It's been frustrating, infuriating, and frazzled my nerves to the point that I have at times wanted to commit heinous acts on my fellow man, but looking back I wouldn't change a thing. It forced me to learn what I needed to learn, and in the end that has been an extremely positive thing.
Dig
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|