LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-27-2005, 01:19 PM   #1
Franklin
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Slackware, WinXP, Windows 7
Posts: 1,253

Rep: Reputation: 55
Pat makes it official: Gnome is gone from -current


Read the changelog (I'm sure you know how to find it)

Official KDE 3.4 packages available as well.

Don't shoot the messenger
 
Old 03-27-2005, 01:50 PM   #2
cylix
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Fedora Core 3
Posts: 125

Rep: Reputation: 15
I'm trying to find out where this is....

So far, the changelog just says they've upgraded the new packages.
 
Old 03-27-2005, 02:24 PM   #3
Franklin
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Slackware, WinXP, Windows 7
Posts: 1,253

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 55
Quote:
gnome/*: Removed from -current, and turned over to community support and
distribution. I'm not going to rehash all the reasons behind this, but it's
been under consideration for more than four years. There are already good
projects in place to provide Slackware GNOME for those who want it, and
these are more complete than what Slackware has shipped in the past. So, if
you're looking for GNOME for Slackware -current, I would recommend looking at
these two projects for well-built packages that follow a policy of minimal
interference with the base Slackware system:

http://gsb.sf.net
http://gware.sf.net

There is also Dropline, of course, which is quite popular. However, due to
their policy of adding PAM and replacing large system packages (like the
entire X11 system) with their own versions, I can't give quite the same sort
of nod to Dropline. Nevertheless, it remains another choice, and it's _your_
system, so I will also mention their project:

http://www.dropline.net/gnome/

Please do not incorrectly interpret any of this as a slight against GNOME
itself, which (although it does usually need to be fixed and polished beyond
the way it ships from upstream more so than, say, KDE or XFce) is a decent
desktop choice. So are a lot of others, but Slackware does not need to ship
every choice. GNOME is and always has been a moving target (even the
"stable" releases usually aren't quite ready yet) that really does demand a
team to keep up on all the changes (many of which are not always well
documented). I fully expect that this move will improve the quality of both
Slackware itself, and the quality (and quantity) of the GNOME options
available for it.

Folks, this is how open source is supposed to work. Enjoy. :-)
 
Old 03-27-2005, 02:25 PM   #4
Haiyadragon
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Gorredijk, Netherlands
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 400

Rep: Reputation: 30
Re: Pat makes it official: Gnome is gone from -current

Quote:
Originally posted by Franklin
Read the changelog (I'm sure you know how to find it)
Still, a link would've been nice.

Quote:
gnome/*: Removed from -current, and turned over to community support and
distribution. I'm not going to rehash all the reasons behind this, but it's
been under consideration for more than four years. There are already good
projects in place to provide Slackware GNOME for those who want it, and
these are more complete than what Slackware has shipped in the past. So, if
you're looking for GNOME for Slackware -current, I would recommend looking at
these two projects for well-built packages that follow a policy of minimal
interference with the base Slackware system:

http://gsb.sf.net
http://gware.sf.net

There is also Dropline, of course, which is quite popular. However, due to
their policy of adding PAM and replacing large system packages (like the
entire X11 system) with their own versions, I can't give quite the same sort
of nod to Dropline. Nevertheless, it remains another choice, and it's _your_
system, so I will also mention their project:

http://www.dropline.net/gnome/

Please do not incorrectly interpret any of this as a slight against GNOME
itself, which (although it does usually need to be fixed and polished beyond
the way it ships from upstream more so than, say, KDE or XFce) is a decent
desktop choice. So are a lot of others, but Slackware does not need to ship
every choice. GNOME is and always has been a moving target (even the
"stable" releases usually aren't quite ready yet) that really does demand a
team to keep up on all the changes (many of which are not always well
documented). I fully expect that this move will improve the quality of both
Slackware itself, and the quality (and quantity) of the GNOME options
available for it.

Folks, this is how open source is supposed to work. Enjoy. :-)
I use to be a Gnome follower but they (Gnome devs) are crapping all over it. It gets worse every version. And without a clean install from current I'm probably never going to touch it again. Also, the alternatives are pretty weak. Only Gsb released a 2.10 version, and that didn't work well at all. Dropline used to be fast about it...

edit. Damn I'm slow...
 
Old 03-27-2005, 02:25 PM   #5
xushi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,288

Rep: Reputation: 45
its not the end of the world.. just get it from the other developers Pat mentioned about...
 
Old 03-27-2005, 10:46 PM   #6
killerbob
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, ON
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 662

Rep: Reputation: 30
gdm is about the only thing I'll miss. I still don't like kdm, and have yet to bother trying to figure out how to get it to talk to remote X servers through xdmcp. It's not absolutely necessary, since I have SSH, but I do like to be able to log in remotely through that protocol.
 
Old 03-28-2005, 12:01 AM   #7
cereal83
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 478

Rep: Reputation: 30
I never used or liked gnome so thank god in a way
 
Old 03-28-2005, 12:14 AM   #8
J.W.
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642

Rep: Reputation: 69
Yipes, this is huge news. Regardless of whether someone uses Slackware or prefers another distro, no one can question that Patrick knows what he's doing, and if he is steering away from Gnome, that's a serious vote.

Personally I think Gnome has its merits, but KDE is my default desktop environment on both my distros of choice. It will be interesting to see if/how the other distros react to this decision. Just my 2 cents -- J.W.
 
Old 03-28-2005, 02:34 AM   #9
xgreen
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: Slackware,Ubuntu
Posts: 389

Rep: Reputation: 30
i think dropping gnome is not an issue...because some distro provide gnome only like ubuntu and some KDE like MEPIS...so there is nothing wrong by dropping gnome..and no one should question pat decision.... if somebody does....pls question to ubuntu why they don't include KDE...

i think is a matter of choice......
 
Old 03-28-2005, 02:41 AM   #10
Stang_Man
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Distribution: Slackware 10.2, RHEL4 AS
Posts: 29

Rep: Reputation: 15
I haven't used anything but Gnome so I don't really have a valid opinion on the subject... But I don't have any problems with Gnome and I enjoy using it.
 
Old 03-28-2005, 02:54 AM   #11
vharishankar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,142
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 121Reputation: 121
KDE is just a more professional-looking, finished product. Gnome has never appealed to me. After using KDE, Gnome feels rustic and lacking in features. KDE is *immensely* configurable.

But that's just my subjective opinion.
 
Old 03-28-2005, 02:59 AM   #12
trey85stang
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,090

Rep: Reputation: 41
Quote:
Originally posted by Harishankar
KDE is just a more professional-looking, finished product. Gnome has never appealed to me. After using KDE, Gnome feels rustic and lacking in features. KDE is *immensely* configurable.

But that's just my subjective opinion.
I feel the exact opposite

I am a gnome fan... but if its not in the distro.. I will get it elsewhere. Salckware is still my OS
 
Old 03-28-2005, 03:09 AM   #13
vharishankar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,142
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 121Reputation: 121
It really doesn't matter much. Gnome fans can use other sources to install as well. I don't use Slackware so this problem is not really of much interest to me, but I believe that Gnome can still be installed through 3rd party utils.

The reason I didn't install Ubuntu is because of Gnome. It takes a lot of getting used to and the "power" feel of KDE is just not there.

I think the gap between KDE users and Gnome users is unbridgeable. The two desktop environments are as different from one another as night is to day.
 
Old 03-28-2005, 06:47 AM   #14
Oholiab
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware 10.1
Posts: 165

Rep: Reputation: 30
... I never even used the second install disk anyway! I wanted to make sure Iwas installing the minimum umber of packages anyway, so I simply only burned the first install disk... Gnome is on the second, so I used dropline instead, although admittedly I'm kinda annoyed that the default server for a dropline install is no longer working and they've completely failed to notify on their site!
 
Old 03-28-2005, 07:13 AM   #15
Franklin
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Slackware, WinXP, Windows 7
Posts: 1,253

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 55
Quote:
Originally posted by nazmin
i think dropping gnome is not an issue...because some distro provide gnome only like ubuntu and some KDE like MEPIS...so there is nothing wrong by dropping gnome..and no one should question pat decision.... if somebody does....pls question to ubuntu why they don't include KDE...

i think is a matter of choice......
Apples and oranges.

Many recent "distros of the month" started out with only Gnome or KDE. For the oldest, still maintained distro to drop something that they have always provided AND have that be an ENTIRE desktop environment, IMHO, is about far more than Gnome.

I would not be surprised if other large distros began to drop big things from the package list as well - not because PV did, but because they always wanted to. The descision making process is just much longer in situations where there is not only one person at the helm. Even in PV's case, it took 4 years for him to finally get around to doing it.

I think the handwriting is on the wall. The day of providing everything but the kitchen sink is coming to an end. Look at Debian's recent descision to stop supporting a number of architectures in the interest of decreasing the time between releases. Not exactly the same thing, but the same issues are at work. Just because this is free software doesn,t mean the economics of time and manpower are not a consideration.

That's it for now, my crystal ball is out of batteries.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
running dclient makes gnome and kde slow Steve Mading Linux - Wireless Networking 0 11-11-2004 04:13 PM
internet makes gnome hang nontoxic Linux - Software 2 11-11-2004 02:48 PM
current process's in gnome ? zeedoo Linux - Software 1 07-12-2004 12:39 PM
Slackware CURRENT has Gnome 2.6 Frank_Drebin Slackware 10 05-09-2004 04:33 AM
Is slack-current the same as the official 9.1 release? BearClaw Slackware 1 09-07-2003 12:57 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration