LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-08-2005, 01:14 PM   #1
spaceballs
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Distribution: Slackware-current
Posts: 248

Rep: Reputation: 30
Arrow Openbox v Enlightenment v Fluxbox


I used to use Dropline Gnome, before moving to Fluxbox. What I liked about fluxbox, was how simple it was to configure, and how it made it easier to use my computer. I think the rest of the fluxbox users out there can attest to how it has enhanced their use.

I have considered switching to something a little prettier maybe. I have thought about xfce, but it seems to heavy. Enlightenment and openbox offer a lot of options, but I am not sure of their ease of use.

Are they any fluxbox (or former fluxbox) users who have made, or have attempted to make, the switch to openbox or enlightenment, or a similar window manager?
 
Old 07-08-2005, 01:24 PM   #2
gbonvehi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Argentina (SR, LP)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,145

Rep: Reputation: 51
If you want something prettier I don't think you can do things in OpenBox that you couldn't with Fluxbox, the first is actually only a Window Manager, it doesn't provide you a taskbar or something similar. You have to "complete" it with external programs like PyPanel.

Enlightenment is nice, I've never could get used to it, but I liked it a lot when I used it. Some things are easy to configure, some don't. You may want to try the e17 version that's currently on development.

I think the best you can do is to try them all, I've tried at least 20 Window Managers before I stayed with one.
 
Old 07-08-2005, 04:34 PM   #3
gbhil
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: /dev/input/chair0
Distribution: Slackware, Gentoo, Vector, Roll-your-own-with-GNU binutils
Posts: 174

Rep: Reputation: 30
By all means try OpenBox3
I used to use fluxbox, but made the switch and am very happy with the result.

A very functional desktop can be achieved with OpenBox, pypanle/fbpanel, feh, and obconf
I'll also point you to the link in my sig, a new project with some IMO needed tools for Openbox
 
Old 07-08-2005, 11:53 PM   #4
gtgoku
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: India
Distribution: Slackware 10; FreeBSD 4.10
Posts: 77

Rep: Reputation: 15
I have used gnome, Xfce, Openbox and Fluxbox.
Am pretty happy with fluxbox.
I used the images from the xfce themes ( found in folder /usr/share/themes ) to write themes for fluxbox :P
I haven't tried Enlightenment e17 , and think it is better to wait till it is completed.

What do you people think about fvwm? i heard it is highly configurable. What are its advantages?
 
Old 07-09-2005, 12:21 AM   #5
gbonvehi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Argentina (SR, LP)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,145

Rep: Reputation: 51
gtgoku, I've used fvwm in the past and I think it's great. It's very configurable be warned, it's VERY configurable, that means you've to read a lot to get things done like you want. What's great about it, it's that you can make it look different in every aspect, here are some screenshots, all from fvwm: http://fvwm.math.uh.edu/screenshots/

Edit: I was visiting fvwm page now that you brought it to my mind again and here's the screenshot section: http://www.fvwm.org/screenshots/desktops/

Oh and by the way.. the default theme and usability of fvwm is not nice

Last edited by gbonvehi; 07-09-2005 at 12:25 AM.
 
Old 07-09-2005, 06:42 AM   #6
ingvildr
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: England, South East
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 358

Rep: Reputation: 30
i've just started using afterstep 2, fvwm just seemed to ugly for a first impression lol. And its quite a joy to use and work with, that and i love the default theme and background .
 
Old 07-09-2005, 04:00 PM   #7
gargamel
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Distribution: Slackware, SLAX, OpenSuSE
Posts: 1,605

Rep: Reputation: 142Reputation: 142
OpenBox3 is excellent. It
- integrates well with just about everything (KDE, Gnome, etc)
- is easy to configure
- superfast
- looks good out-of-the-(open)-box ;-)
- is pretty stable
- has the lowest footprint since Oroborus (a *VERY* small wm)
- teams up with many existing panel and taskbar programs almost seamlessly
- and so on.

The roots of Fluxbox and Openbox are the same, BTW. Both were based on Blackbox originally. While Fluxbox still is, Openbox3 seems to be written completely from scratch.

On Slackware Fluxbox is the easier to use of the two, because it comes with useful defaults. In Openbox3 you have to create a useful setup, first.

I subscribe to everything said on FVWM. Extremely powerful and also very fast. Too powerful for me... ;-)

If you are interested in a real simplistic, but unique wm, take a look at wm2. It is, well, different... ;-)

Have fun!

gargamel
 
Old 07-10-2005, 12:14 AM   #8
sovietpower
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Slackware64 14.1 and -current
Posts: 208

Rep: Reputation: 30
I have been using Enlightenment DR 17 for awhile now and I would have to say its pretty stable. Its CVS code so some of it doesn't work. For the most part its pretty cool. I used to use Fluxbox or Enlightenment DR 16. I never liked Gnome or KDE too Windows for me. Its not like I don't have a good enough machine either just look at my specs. Conclusion, E17 is pretty stable for now the gui for the menu editor doesn't work when trying to remove things so you will have to hand edit basically everything. If you want a screenshot of what mine looks like goto Desktop It can be a pain to edit everything but all for all its worth it in the end. I just can't get my gdesklets or adesklets to work with it and thats my only complaint. You can make E17 look really really cool. Oh theres also a link if you decide to test it out and here it is http://get-e.org/


-Sovietpower
 
Old 07-10-2005, 09:10 AM   #9
gtgoku
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: India
Distribution: Slackware 10; FreeBSD 4.10
Posts: 77

Rep: Reputation: 15
sovietpower your desktop sure looks cool (especially the zelda wallpaper ) .
I will get E17 tonight.
I also got fvwm and checking it out right now. It sure does't look good the first time you start it.
 
Old 07-15-2005, 06:01 PM   #10
gargamel
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Distribution: Slackware, SLAX, OpenSuSE
Posts: 1,605

Rep: Reputation: 142Reputation: 142
...never understood why the defaults of FVWM are so ugly...
FVWM can look so *cool*...

gargamel
 
Old 08-10-2005, 12:16 PM   #11
DJOtaku
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Fedora 20; Arch; Kubuntu; Debian
Posts: 710

Rep: Reputation: 31
Enlightenment D16 is really cool, but it's a VERY different paradigm than any other WM I've ever used. The first time I used it I hated it so much! Then after I started using the Gnome/KDE alternatives Blackbox, Fluxbox, etc I came to understand the concepts more and more. I've been using fluxbox since around March of this year and just now started evaluating E DR 16. It seems to run faster than fluxbox, but I'm not entirely sure. I'm still getting used to it as it's pretty different than anything else I've ever seen or used.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Openbox and Fluxbox gtgoku Slackware 13 03-24-2008 10:27 PM
Fluxbox Blackbox or Openbox? Ray_Kovecses Linux - Software 2 09-30-2005 11:09 PM
Enlightenment ICONBOX for Gnome or Fluxbox animehair Linux - Software 1 06-23-2005 04:39 PM
Blackbox vs. Openbox vs. fluxbox denizen Linux - Software 10 12-01-2004 11:44 PM
How to use openbox(or fluxbox) rmanocha Linux - Software 12 02-19-2004 11:30 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration