LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 05-31-2007, 11:07 AM   #1
polarbear20000
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Holt, FL
Distribution: Slackware 13
Posts: 98
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 16
Next release?


Is it too early to start a feeding frenzy by asking when Slackware 12 might be out, or can I safely ask that question and still get out alive?

Keeping my system tuned to the -current tree is probably not an option while on dial-up, so that is why I'm wondering. No such thing as a dumb question, right?
 
Old 05-31-2007, 11:26 AM   #2
bsdunix
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Distribution: Caldera, CTOS, Debian, FreeBSD, Mac OS X, Mandrake, Minix, OpenBSD, Slackware, SuSE
Posts: 1,757

Rep: Reputation: 78
for everytime that's been asked. It will be out when it's ready. If you need a more definative answer you'll have to ask Pat.
 
Old 05-31-2007, 11:28 AM   #3
Okie
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 964

Rep: Reputation: 34
Slackware-12? no Slackware-11.1?

are the 2.4.xx kernels are being put out to pasture?
 
Old 05-31-2007, 12:22 PM   #4
pdw_hu
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Distribution: Slackware, Gentoo
Posts: 346

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Okie
Slackware-12? no Slackware-11.1?

are the 2.4.xx kernels are being put out to pasture?
Probably they are. Read Pat's comment on this, somewhere in the current changelog. As we know him, this big change (for slackware) is probably gonna take a while longer than usual releases.
 
Old 05-31-2007, 03:35 PM   #5
rworkman
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Tuscaloosa, Alabama (USA)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,913

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Okie
Slackware-12? no Slackware-11.1?

are the 2.4.xx kernels are being put out to pasture?
There's been no official statement on the version number of the next release.

In regards to 2.4.x kernels, they are indeed out - the next release of Slackware will have glibc-2.5, which does not support 2.4 kernels.
 
Old 05-31-2007, 04:03 PM   #6
Jeebizz
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware 14.1 64-bit with multilib
Posts: 2,074

Rep: Reputation: 199Reputation: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by rworkman
There's been no official statement on the version number of the next release.
I don't know about the version number, but there will be 2.6

Quote:
Mon Nov 20 14:31:25 CST 2006
Thanks to everyone who provided valuable feedback on the question below. It
looks as if Slackware -current (future 12.0?) is going to charge into 2.6-only
territory, but it will be a conservative "charge". :-) The overwhelming
consensus is that the 2.6 series is now more than stable enough for production
use. Some folks expressed concern over the loss of Linux 2.4.x compatibility,
but they were a definite minority. Some suggested maintaining two -current
branches -- one following 2.4 and the other 2.6. The solution that'll be
taken concerning 2.4.x will be to make Slackware 11.0 better maintained than
simply security updates. It should see some other non-security updates as
well (perhaps the introduction of an /updates directory?), and will be a long
lived OS for those who swear by the stability of the 2.4.x kernel series.
Meanwhile, 2.4.x compatibility features (such as the, er, mess? going on in
the startup scripts) will be steadily eliminated in -current to focus on the
best possible 2.6.x support. With a lot of work, we should be able to make
the next Slackware release an excellent choice for both servers and desktops.
Again -- thanks for all the input! :-)

Last edited by Jeebizz; 05-31-2007 at 04:05 PM.
 
Old 05-31-2007, 04:31 PM   #7
Okie
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 964

Rep: Reputation: 34
i was just curious about the kernel changes, the 2.6.xx kernels are quite nice now, i have Crux running 2.6.21.3 and it boots & runs great, just waiting for Alsa to officially release 1.0.14 get sound working in Crux, i like Crux but Slackware will always be my favorite, (Pat V. sure rolls a good distro)...
 
Old 05-31-2007, 05:04 PM   #8
drumz
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 188

Rep: Reputation: 33
I forgot who mentioned it, but I read a while back in these forums that someone had made the observation that every time glibc was updated, Slackware's major version number changed (e.g. 10.2->11.0). If it wasn't, the release was a point release. Of course, this is more of a "Moore's Law" than a "law of gravity" law.

Note: I did not check the validity of this statement, I just know I read it here on LQ.
 
Old 06-01-2007, 02:32 AM   #9
pdw_hu
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Distribution: Slackware, Gentoo
Posts: 346

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Okie
i was just curious about the kernel changes, the 2.6.xx kernels are quite nice now, i have Crux running 2.6.21.3 and it boots & runs great, just waiting for Alsa to officially release 1.0.14 get sound working in Crux, i like Crux but Slackware will always be my favorite, (Pat V. sure rolls a good distro)...
Alsa 1.0.14 is already commited to 2.6.22-rc3-git4
 
Old 06-01-2007, 10:52 AM   #10
Okie
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 964

Rep: Reputation: 34
cool! thanks for the info pdw_hu, alsa rc4 is working and i have AudoVideo now, when alsa-1.0.14 is officially released i guess it wont hurt to just install it as it will just go on top (overwrite) of rc4
 
Old 06-01-2007, 12:18 PM   #11
Lufbery
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Distribution: Slackware 64 14.0
Posts: 1,142
Blog Entries: 29

Rep: Reputation: 119Reputation: 119
Regarding the 2.4 kernels, the following excerpt from the above quoted portion of the Current changelog is interesting:

Quote:
The solution that'll be taken concerning 2.4.x will be to make Slackware 11.0 better maintained than simply security updates. It should see some other non-security updates as well (perhaps the introduction of an /updates directory?), and will be a long lived OS for those who swear by the stability of the 2.4.x kernel series.
That's great. I'm running Slackware 11 with the default 2.4 kernel on my desktop computer and it's working just fine. After tweaking my fstab, I'm able to plug in and mount flash drives, DVDs and CDs just fine.

I'm not sure what the differences are between the two kernels -- I'm still trying to learn about that -- and I'm really not sure if the 2.6 kernel is more unstable than the 2.4.

I'm not sure there's a compelling reason to switch from 2.4 to 2.6 right now. Can someone shed some light on that?

Regards,

-Drew
 
Old 06-01-2007, 01:05 PM   #12
Okie
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 964

Rep: Reputation: 34
there is a lot of good to be said about the 2.4.xx kernels, i have slack 10.2 with the latest 2.4 and it is just super stable and responsive in both GUI & CLI, (rock solid)...

the 2.4.xx kernels do lack features in the 2.6.xx kernels though, no udev & no HAL support to name two, but the 2.6.xx kernels if hand rolled leaving out un-necessary items does run plenty stable too, seems to be just as fast and responsive as the 2.4.xx (to me it does) i am glad the 2.6.xx kernels can be built in such as way that initrd.img wont be necessary since i hate that feature & rather have filesystem support built right in to the kernel (filesystem support built as modules need an initrd.img to load them before booting the OS)...

when Slackware-12 gets released i should have no problem using it...

Last edited by Okie; 06-03-2007 at 07:27 AM.
 
Old 06-02-2007, 10:57 PM   #13
davidsrsb
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Distribution: Slackware 13.37 current
Posts: 770

Rep: Reputation: 33
Dual core cpus are the norm now in both desktops and even laptops. I would not be shocked to see a smp kernel becoming "standard" in 12.0 or soon after.
 
Old 06-02-2007, 11:06 PM   #14
unixfool
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Northern VA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, OS X
Posts: 781
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 157Reputation: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidsrsb
Dual core cpus are the norm now in both desktops and even laptops. I would not be shocked to see a smp kernel becoming "standard" in 12.0 or soon after.
They're the norm for new machines, but I don't think they're the most common if you factor in ALL CPUs, legacy or otherwise.

I've only one dual core machine out of eight in my house. I'm thinking most households are similar. My mom has only one dual core of three machines. My sister has only one dual core of four in her household.

Dual cores aren't yet the standard if you're factoring in ALL computers. It'll be a very long time before single core machines begin to go the way of the dodo...that time isn't upon us yet.
 
Old 06-03-2007, 05:29 AM   #15
erklaerbaer
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Posts: 381

Rep: Reputation: 30
can someone shed some light on this?
Quote:
NOTE: it is probably best to use the SMP kernel even in
a single processor machine if it will run. The non-SMP kernels should
really be used only in machines that are not at least a Pentium-Pro, or
that (for some other reason) will not properly run the SMP kernel.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What release and other Q jogl_z_8 Linux - Newbie 5 02-15-2007 06:58 PM
Where did 5.3-Release go? bshearer *BSD 3 06-02-2006 09:20 AM
FC5 development release and FC5 official release- where is the DVD iso? smiley_lauf Fedora 11 03-13-2006 01:38 PM
SUSE Release 10 RC1 Release Candidate 1 available 1kyle Suse/Novell 8 09-11-2005 06:26 PM
Release IP gordongraham Linux - Networking 4 06-23-2005 02:57 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration