LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-26-2007, 10:47 PM   #16
tuxdev
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,014

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115

Cool.

You haven't run out of pre-1.0 versions yet, there's always a possible PkgBuild 0.9.10. I don't think you need to do that, though. It's 1.0 ready IMO.
 
Old 01-27-2007, 12:03 AM   #17
gnashley
Amigo developer
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,775

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 481Reputation: 481Reputation: 481Reputation: 481Reputation: 481
Can you test the jam and scons stuff for me? I think I may have fouled it up moving code around. Love to hear anything that helps make PkgBuild better.
 
Old 01-27-2007, 11:15 AM   #18
tuxdev
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,014

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
I've done a bit of testing by running the rosegarden(Yay!) and supertux PkgBuilds. fake_install is broken because it can't find an install rule in SConstruct or Jamfile. Why are you trying to detect whether an install rule exists, anyway? If there isn't one, it would just fail.
 
Old 01-27-2007, 01:00 PM   #19
gnashley
Amigo developer
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,775

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 481Reputation: 481Reputation: 481Reputation: 481Reputation: 481
That's why I wanted you to try it -I was never clear on whether the 'usual' SConstruct or Jamfile would have an install 'rule' as Makefiles do. If this is not the case I'll change the code. I've been working on that section of code to improve handling of install.sh scripts and other stuff wioth no regular Makefile. The thing is that I've included the the SConstruct and Jamfile in the search for some sort of Makefile, which are then checked for an install rule. This is not really necessary any longer as we can just run the command and check for success afterwards.
Commenting out this line (710) in configure_source should fix it:
check-makefile
I appreciate the feedback, as usual.
 
Old 01-27-2007, 04:32 PM   #20
tuxdev
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,014

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
"FATAL! Running 'scons install' has failed with error: 0"

Nuff said.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
'src2pkg' Converts sources to installable packages gnashley Slackware 34 12-23-2007 07:13 AM
New PkgBuild version includes 'trackinstall' gnashley Slackware 3 11-02-2006 11:37 AM
PkgBuild/src2pkg upgrade gnashley Slackware - Installation 1 10-20-2006 08:28 AM
PkgBuild & src2pkg upgrade gnashley Slackware 5 09-23-2006 04:31 AM
PkgBuild-0.9 is released with new features. gnashley Slackware 6 06-26-2006 01:36 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:16 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration