SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I just thought you boys and girls would like to know that yesterday nVidia released their 1.0-7167 drivers for linux. I installed them on Slackware 10.1, Kernel 2.6.11 without any mucking around with patches to get the drivers installed. They work great for me. Woohoo!
I still get the "/sbin/depmod -aq" error, like I did with the 6629 drivers, but I just told it to continue anyway and they seem to work (I haven't tried anything that actually uses OpenGL yet).
Here's a snippet from the end of my nvidia-installer.log:
Code:
-> Installing 'NVIDIA Accelerated Graphics Driver for Linux-x86' (1.0-7167):
executing: './usr/src/nv/makedevices.sh'...
executing: '/sbin/ldconfig'...
executing: '/sbin/depmod -aq'...
depmod: multiply defined
depmod: multiply defined
depmod:
multiply defined
depmod: multiply defined
depmod: multiply defined
depmod: vut multiply defined
depmod: multiply defined
depmod: multiply defined
depmod: multiply defined
depmod: multiply defined
ERROR: Failed to execute `/sbin/depmod -aq`: depmod: multiply defined
depmod: multiply defined
depmod:
multiply defined
depmod: multiply defined
depmod: multiply defined
depmod: vut multiply defined
depmod: multiply defined
depmod: multiply defined
depmod: multiply defined
depmod: multiply defined
-> The installer has encountered the following error during installation: 'Fail
ed to execute `/sbin/depmod -aq`'. Continue anyway? ("no" will abort)? (Ans
wer: Yes)
-> done.
-> Driver file installation is complete.
-> Running post-install sanity check:
-> done.
-> Post-install sanity check passed.
-> Shared memory test passed.
-> Running runtime sanity check:
-> done.
-> Runtime sanity check passed.
-> Installation of the NVIDIA Accelerated Graphics Driver for Linux-x86
(version: 1.0-7167) is now complete. Please update your XF86Config or
xorg.conf file as appropriate; see the file
/usr/share/doc/NVIDIA_GLX-1.0/README for details.
Originally posted by Seiken I still get the "/sbin/depmod -aq" error, like I did with the 6629 drivers, but I just told it to continue anyway and they seem to work (I haven't tried anything that actually uses OpenGL yet).
Hmmm, strange... I upgraded to 7167 from 6629 without a hitch (less than three minutes). When I installed 6629 long ago I didn't have any trouble installing it either (once I had applied the necessary patches).
I'm running my own custom compiled vanilla 2.6.11 kernel and am not running any of the precompiled kernels included with Slackware.
Coolness, Thanks. I just installed the new drivers and they work, unlike the other ones. Thanks alot for the info. by the way, I did glxgears after configureing and am getting around 3000 fps. Before I had 265, lol.
Originally posted by Seiken I am running the 2.4.29 that came with 10.1.
I'll have to install the 2.4.29 kernel that comes with 10.1 and see if I can reproduce your problem. Do the new drivers work for you now or are you having problems?
Which of the 2.4.29 kernels are you using? (bare.i, bareacpi.i, etc?)
bare.i, I think. I didn't specify anything different. and yes, they are working now. I ran glxgears, and get around 820fps windows, and 120 fullscreen (geforce2 mx400 on a p4 1.6)... so I'm assuming that means they work
Originally posted by Seiken bare.i, I think. I didn't specify anything different. and yes, they are working now. I ran glxgears, and get around 820fps windows, and 120 fullscreen (geforce2 mx400 on a p4 1.6)... so I'm assuming that means they work
Great to hear that they're working! On my PIII 600 192MB RAM (with a geforce2 mx400 32MB AGP adapter) I'm getting 865fps on the default window size that glxgears starts with and somewhere around 184fps in full screen (1280x1024).
Originally posted by Seiken holy... why are my fps rates so low in comparison to yours? is there some tweaking I should be aware of?
I think you said you were using kernel 2.4.29, remember...I'm using 2.6.11 -- which "may" be the difference. Of course, I don't know if the default 2.4.29 kernel in Slackware 10.1 has SMP compiled into it, if not...you might want to look at compiling a new kernel with SMP (multiple processor support) option enabled. Linux sees all P4 processors with hyperthreading as dual processors. However, if it is turned on in 2.4.29 you may want to compile a 2.6.11 kernel for use on your system and see if you gain any speed increases.
FYI a quick summary of some hardware in my system:
PIII 600
192MB RAM PC 100
geForce mx400 32MB RAM (AGP)
Motherboard with an Intel 820 Chipset with integrated audio.
Lite-On 8x4x32x CDRW
Something else I just thought of, have you set the amount of "VideoRam" in your xorg.conf file? It defaults to 4096 (4mb). You might also want to lower the DefaultDepth from 24 or 32 to 16 unless you really need that many colors. I happen to use DefaultDepth 16 and not 24 or 32 because I don't need that many colors. Lowering the DefaultDepth also helps performance at the cost of the number of colors displayed to the screen.
For me new drivers don't compile. They complain about missing the kernel source, but even if I specify the path to the soruce, ti complains again. The only solution is to load agpgart module, and then, drivers compile. This is weird, cause I don't use agpgart, but nvidia. The new drivers worked poorly compared with 6629, so I switched back to them.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.