LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 08-30-2005, 04:03 AM   #1
matthewa
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: Slackware 10.1
Posts: 123

Rep: Reputation: 15
Need more .tgz's!


In my "cd burning anyone?" thread, I learned that I could download .tgz files especially designed to be used by the installpkg software. A little googling put me on my way to learning the other nice little pkg tools offered in Slackware. Now heres the question,

Where do you Slackers hide all them there .tgz at, pilgrim?......lol


I have found the linuxpackages.net site. Are there any others?




I am so freakin in love with Slackware! I have finally found my beloved distro!!!
 
Old 08-30-2005, 04:41 AM   #2
satinet
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: England
Distribution: Slackware 11, Sabayon 3.1
Posts: 1,464

Rep: Reputation: 46
great.

well linux packages is the best resource some might say.

Don't forget you can use different package managers to get different packages. Check out slackpkg, slapt-get and swaret

you can also convert RPM's to slackpackages.

there probably aren't as many packages as debian though, it has to be said.
 
Old 08-30-2005, 04:48 AM   #3
kodon
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: [jax][fl][usa]
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 796

Rep: Reputation: 31
you can also make your own packages with
checkinstall when compiling from source.
 
Old 08-30-2005, 05:03 AM   #4
titopoquito
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Ruhr Area, Germany
Distribution: Slackware64 14.0
Posts: 1,517

Rep: Reputation: 90
Or you look into the Slackbuild buildscripts. They are on CD 3 and 4 or on the slackware servers. With this you can create easily an tgz package for special applications that you cannot find on the Slack CDs or on linuxpackages.net. With buildscripts you don't have the same limitations like checkinstall (but checkinstall is nice).
 
Old 08-30-2005, 05:39 AM   #5
phil.d.g
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,192

Rep: Reputation: 101Reputation: 101
I either tend to either use packages from the slackware ftp site, or one of its mirrors, or if a package is not available I tend to compile from source and use checkinstall so that I have a means of uninstalling if I wish as many Makefiles don't include an uninstall, remove or deinstall target. Its a rare occasion when I use a third party site like linuxpackages.net for packages but it has been known.

Some software developers may distribute a slackware package aswell as a debian or fedora core package but thats quite rare aswell
 
Old 08-30-2005, 01:44 PM   #6
Poetics
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,178

Rep: Reputation: 49
If I'm upgrading/(re)installing something from the Slack CDs, I use slackpkg all the way. Else ... pure source, baby!
 
Old 08-30-2005, 02:18 PM   #7
north49er
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: 60.47'N lat
Distribution: fedora 15 x86_64
Posts: 156

Rep: Reputation: 18
I might as well ask here as we're talking about installpkg/upgradepkg. I do my upgrades from upgrade cdrom disks because I only have access to dialup at home (some packages are quite big). What I like to know is if installpkg or upgradepkg has a switch that installs packages after a certain package creation date, or upgrade packages only if the target is an earlier version. Unless one knows the limitations of the slack package handlers, they have to used with caution.
 
Old 08-30-2005, 08:58 PM   #8
SlackMaster
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 15
north49er,

You should checkout Swaret:
http://swaret.sourceforge.net/

It does what you're looking for. It's normally used to locate and install patches and other upgraded packages from the various Slackware mirror sites, but it can be configured to work from a local repository (like a cd, etc.) of packages.
 
Old 08-31-2005, 05:54 AM   #9
gnashley
Amigo developer
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,751

Rep: Reputation: 462Reputation: 462Reputation: 462Reputation: 462Reputation: 462
upgradepkg checks the package version number against what is installed -no dates or dependency checking. It then installs the new package, removes the old package and reinstalls the new one again, and then changes the name of the package in /var/log/packages to show that it's an upgrade.
When doing upgrades to basic GUI stuff (like X itself), do the upgrade from the command line. When upgrading basic system packages like the C libraries or init packages, it's best to do that remotely -I mean use a rescue disk or boot from the install CD. Upgrading basic system libs while running those libs is very tricky and can lead to disasters.
Personally I rarely upgrade anything unless I have very goos, specific reason. Security updates should always be applied -these will show up the /patches directory of stable releases on your favorite Slackware mirror (google for 'getslack').
Otherwise, I don't upgrade unless I need a specific new feature that comes with a certain version. In fact I sometimes DOWNgrade in order to use a lighter, handier version, or to achieve/maintain compatiblity with another specific package.
 
Old 08-31-2005, 01:12 PM   #10
ringwraith
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Slackware-current
Posts: 1,244

Rep: Reputation: 47
The OP asked where else to get Slack packs, other than linuxpackages.net..... Such places seem to come and go. You might occasionally do a google search. The Slackware gnome sites (freerock, dropline, linuce, etc.) obviously have a lot of packages available but you may have to do full install to use them. Alot of Slack users do not use anything from linuxpackages as they prefer to roll their own as mentioned above.Converting rpm2tgz is usually not recommended and should only be used if there is a real reason to do it (proprietary binary for one) as it is not a dependable process.
 
Old 09-02-2005, 01:22 AM   #11
digimafia
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 17

Rep: Reputation: 0
checkinstall is great

i must agree with the guy who mentioned checkinstall its a great little program. basically you use checkinstall in place of 'make install' during the './configure && make && make install' process and a .tgz file is created that you can install with installpkg and remove likewise with removepkg. i highly recommend this program it's easy to use and comes in handy!
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
On the RedHat 9.0 how does the cd install the applications? WIth rpm, binary, tgz's?? Laptop2250 Linux - Software 7 11-04-2003 12:30 PM
Installing tgz's in Slack digitaldeity Slackware 1 08-17-2003 02:12 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:52 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration