Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
04-28-2010, 10:36 AM
|
#1
|
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Tamil Nadu, India
Distribution: Debian Squeeze (server), Slackware 13.37 (netbook), Slackware64 14.0 (desktop),
Posts: 8,357
|
Mixing 13 and 13-current Java packages; pros and cons
Hello
I understand it is not generally a good idea to mix 13 and 13-current packages but I am installing OpenProj which requires JDK and the installed JRE (6-18) is up-level from 13's JRE (6-16) and back-level from the 13-current JDK (6-19). Presumably JRE and JDK should be at the same level.
Would it be better to take both JRE and JDK to 13-current (6-19) or to take both to 13 (6-16)?
The reason for installing JRE 6-18 was in the hope of solving a Vuze startup segmentation fault problem (it didn't) as discussed in this LQ thread.
Best
Charles
|
|
|
|
04-28-2010, 11:02 AM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slackware-14.0 on a Lenovo T61 6457-4XG
Posts: 2,784
|
Openproj 1.4 made with the SlackBuild from slackbuilds.org works well on Slackware64-13.0 here, so I don't see why you'd need to mix -stable and -current packages, at least in this case.
In any case I wouldn't mix versions between JRE and JDK. And I avoid using -current packages on -stable.
If you really need a package upgrade, IMHO it's better to make it yourself re-using the slackbuild included in -stable if that works.
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
04-28-2010, 01:19 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Carrollton, Texas
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 902
|
Your JDK and JRE should match, but the two java versions that you mention are API compatible.
Plus the JDK comes with a copy of the JRE; there's really no good reason to have both unless you need to run under different JVMs for some external reason.
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
04-29-2010, 04:50 AM
|
#4
|
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Tamil Nadu, India
Distribution: Debian Squeeze (server), Slackware 13.37 (netbook), Slackware64 14.0 (desktop),
Posts: 8,357
Original Poster
|
Thanks Didier ad Richard :-)
Especially useful to learn that Openproj 1.4 SlackBuild works well on Slackware(64)-13.0 and that JDK includes JRE. Given that there's no reason for using JRE 6-18, I'll uninstall it and install JDK from Slackware 13.0 (32 bit).
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|