LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 09-28-2005, 07:36 PM   #1
Duo Secundus
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: Slackware Linux 11.0
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
Misc. Questions About 10.2


1. I understand that a symlink was put in place for 10.2. Was that for Mozilla, Firefox, or both?

2. Do I still have to install, on my own, cabextract and the M$ core web fonts so that the web pages look "better"? I was playing around with 10.1, and I thought that the fonts under Mozilla looked okay, with no extra fonts installed. I remember that the fonts looked ugly in 10.0, which was why I installed the fonts originally.

3. Let's say that I have alsa-driver installed. Then, I recompile the kernel with the same version that came with 10.2 (2.4.31). Will the alsa driver still work with the new kernel?

4. Different scenario: lets's say I have alsa-util, alsa-lib, and alsa-oss installed. Then, let's say I recompile kernel 2.4.31, and compile the source for the alsa driver (as opposed to installing a .tgz). Will the programs under the alsa-util, alsa-lib, and alsa-oss packages still work? Or would it be better to compile the corresponding source?


 
Old 09-29-2005, 05:40 AM   #2
gescom
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Distribution: Slackware 12.1
Posts: 25

Rep: Reputation: 15
When installing alsa I compile only the driver from source and follow the instructions provided from alsa.org for my soundcard (Audigy1). Look for instructions for your soundcard at http://www.alsa-project.org/alsa-doc/

Alsa-util and alsa-lib I install from the Slackware CD in .tgz format. When recompiling the kernel I had to also recompile the driver again for my soundcard to work.

As far as fonts go I wasn't impressed with Kde's default rendering. At the moment I'm using Arial 10 (from windows ttf) with anti-aliasing, sub-pixel hinting (greyscale) with full hinting. Looks nice on an LCD. Gnome's default sans rendering (no sub-pixel) looks better though and is what I use in gtk2 apps.

I found that anti-aliased fonts tended to look better at higher resolutions (1280x1024, 17-19 inch lcd's) as there was alot more pixels to render the font in. 1024x768 and below on a crt wasn't so good if anti-aliasing was turned on.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Misc shell questions Cyth Linux - Software 1 03-13-2003 09:31 AM
Misc Questions OlRoy Linux - General 3 12-09-2002 06:03 PM
Misc Questions.... ugenn Linux - General 2 06-27-2002 01:00 PM
Misc. Linux questions. ugenn Linux - Newbie 7 04-16-2002 09:42 AM
More Misc Linux Questions... ugenn Linux - Newbie 4 04-16-2002 09:38 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration