SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Wish I could take credit. I got it from somebody over on alt.os.linux.slackware.
What I still don't really grasp is where this glitch came from. I had done a general upgrade using swaret a day before installing kernel 2.6.9. From what I read on alt.os.linux.slackware, the problem is due to a messed up udev package that had been on Current for a few days. However, I upgraded from 10.0, not Current.
So I still don't know what the culprit was. If you have a clue, let me know.
I also wonder if there's a better fix, perhaps updating udev or something, rather than correcting the rule.
The culprit has to be something in the way the kernel is configured. When I upgraded my laptop kernel to 2.6.9, the man pages and less broke. However when I upgraded my server, there were no problems. However, the udev.rules files are rather different between the two machines. Since they both have an updated Slackware 10 install, it must be something in the kernel config.
Originally posted by clawhead Umm, not intentionally, no. I just let swaret do its thing by using "swaret --upgrade -a".
Should I have intervened?
Mistake #1............don't let swaret update anything............there was a reason that Pat V. took swaret OUT OF Slack 10--
it is a junk program...........
.........but some people insist on installing and using it anyway..............
Originally posted by 320mb Mistake #1............don't let swaret update anything............there was a reason that Pat V. took swaret OUT OF Slack 10--
it is a junk program...........
.........but some people insist on installing and using it anyway..............
Personally, I think swaret is just fine if used VERY conservatively. What I mean is that you point to stable release (NOT current) at an official mirror and you don't let it resolve dependencies. If you use it that way, there is very little difference between swaret and manually downloading and installing the packages. Unfortunately, swaret doesn't come configured that way so people just use it and get in trouble.
Originally posted by 320mb Mistake #1............don't let swaret update anything............there was a reason that Pat V. took swaret OUT OF Slack 10--
it is a junk program...........
.........but some people insist on installing and using it anyway..............
Can anyone explain what the beef is about swaret? I've been using it for a long time and have never had a problem with it. I think it works very well once the user learns how it works. There have been issues with the current packages, but that is to be expected.
What other updating options are there? I used slapt-get prior to swaret but haven't used it since.
i made the change clawhead posted and i still get this:
Error executing formatting or display command.
System command (cd /usr/man && (echo ".ll 11.3i"; echo ".pl 1100i"; /bin/gunzip -c '/usr/man/man1/lp.1.gz'; echo ".\\\""; echo ".pl \n(nlu+10") | /usr/bin/gtbl | /usr/bin/nroff -S -mandoc | /usr/bin/less -is) exited with status 256.
No manual entry for lp
neat thing is the man page shows for a split second then disappears.
any ideas? do i have to reboot after making the change?
I noticed this morning that the new release of updates [ using swaret, of course ;-) ] includes both udev and kernel 2.6.9. Does this mean that the problems mentioned above have been fixed?
Originally posted by oxleyk I noticed this morning that the new release of updates [ using swaret, of course ;-) ] includes both udev and kernel 2.6.9. Does this mean that the problems mentioned above have been fixed?
Kent
I think it is fixed, based on the following:
(1) Today (1nov04) I updated to the current udev [ not using swaret, of course ;-) ], and man, etc., remain unbroken.
(2) I'm still using kernel 2.6.9.
(3) I checked the suspect rule string in /etc/udev/rules.d/udev.rules, and it looks O.K. The udev.rules had a date of 4;20 a.m. on Nov. 1. I assume this is a fresh ruleset and not a copy or modified copy of my previous, edited ruleset.
Distribution: Slackware 10.2 kernel 2.6.13, Gentoo amd64, Some mish-mash of programs that started with slack 9.0
Posts: 165
Rep:
Quote:
Originally posted by oxleyk Can anyone explain what the beef is about swaret? I've been using it for a long time and have never had a problem with it. I think it works very well once the user learns how it works. There have been issues with the current packages, but that is to be expected.
What other updating options are there? I used slapt-get prior to swaret but haven't used it since.
Kent
Well, here's one reason, not very scientific, but kind of comfirms what I've noticed reading this forum.
I did a forum search using "upgradepkg broken" as the keywords.
upgradepkg LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Search > Thread Results (upgradepkg broken)
Displaying Topics 1 to 8 of 8
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.