[SOLVED] Mailclients - is mutt an alternative to Thunderbird?
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
There is less than 12 hours left to vote in the 2015 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards. Click here to go to the polls. Vote now and make sure your voice is heard!
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Mailclients - is mutt an alternative to Thunderbird?
I feel that Thunderbird becomes more and more bloated. It starts very slowly.
Now I'm considering to use another mailclient. I've tried claws-mail, but it's not better than Thunderbird.
But how about mutt? I've read some documentation and tried it out. I managed to configure it with one of my imap-mailaccounts and it works.
But referring to the documentation there's much more to it.
My questions: how about your experiences? is mutt a good alternative to thunderbird? which configuration is useful? is it worth the effort to learn all the special keys and to learn how to configure it?
Mutt is very powerful but has quite a learning curve. You might find Pine (alpine) a little easier to use and configure if you don't need the advanced features that mutt provides.
Thanks for the answer mRgOBLIN, could you please explain which advanced features you mean.
One of my requirements would be to use two or three mailaccounts with Mutt (what I do as yet with Thunderbird).
And I don't shy away from the learningcurve, provided it's valuable.
Every once in a while I try to get mutt working as my main mail client, but I never can stick with it. It seems like it's awesome at dealing with plaintext emails, but I get sent so many HTML emails, attachments and calendar invitations that I can't seem to leave Seamonkey/Thunderbird + Lightning.
I prefer seamonkey to thunderbird as it's got the old fashioned search and threaded message display..
I wanted a console-based mailer for my little netbook and started with mutt but ditched it after a couple of months. I liked the user interface, but I found mutt's IMAP support poor and its configuration very cumbersome. There's no real notion of accounts or profiles, so I needed a 150 line config full of account- and folder-hooks just for basic operation, and even that never worked very well. Things might be different when your mail is local, but with several IMAP-accounts and profiles mutt is unusable, IMHO.
I switched to alpine then. Confusing in the beginning, but once you grok the concept of roles and folder-collections it's very easy to setup and you actually won't have to touch most of the config options (there are lots!). The user interface is mostly fixed, though. It's fine by me, but if you want to change a keyboard shortcut you're out of luck. Other than mutt, switching between several profiles and IMAP-accounts works fast and reliably.
It wasn't intended that way, but alpine has become my main tool for IMAP access since. It just fits the way I use mail very well. YMMV.
Before alpine, I was using KDE's kmail from 1998 till KDE4 broke it and claws after that. Maybe you should try claws a second time; it's a nice tool with lots of options for the advanced user.
Have you thought of trying to find out why you find Thunderbird slow ? I'm quite happy with the speed. I only use smtp and pop3 - I dislike the idea of my emails sitting on someone else's server - but then I am a bit old fashioned. How big is your inbox ? I archive mails every 2 to 3 months into subfolders. These I then compact.
I'm using mutt for two years now and I'm very happy with it. You can't really say that it's replacement for Thunderbird since their concepts of usage are so different. Thunderbird is all in one, mutt is MUA and mostly just that. It didn't have SMTP support until recent versions. So five mutt users can have 5 different way of handling mail. mutt have it's strengths, but is not perfect. Mind it's motto: "All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less."
You can use it to access your IMAP accounts. I tried that and if you're using header and body caching it will be fast (I have ~50000 mails). But, since I cache headers and bodies, I just as well can have local folders, God intended them to be. So I started to use offlineimap to have all mails at home and at work in the same configuration in Maildir format. This setup works very well for me. I switched to isync after some problems with offlineimap, but it didn't changed anything important in the way I use mutt. I filter mails on servers, so no need for procmail for me.
As for html mails, they can be problematic. I have mailcap entry that invoke lynx to automatically display this kind of mails. That won't work every time. In that case, I have shortcut that can send it to Firefox so I can see it the way sender wanted it. I have mailcap entry for most of the attachments that can be send so I can view them easily including video files (yeah, there are still people that send video files by mail).
I have several different accounts. folder-hooks do it's job in separating it's different settings.
You wont need it's all advanced features, but you will have them if you ever need some of them. I like it's pattern matching ability. You can easily find your mails. Or delete them or move them or whatever you want. http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#ss4.2
Your muttrc will change in time and you will adjust it to your needs. And you will learn about it's features when you need them. But yes, it does takes time to get used to mutt.