LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-15-2013, 08:10 AM   #1
kite
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Shenzhen, China
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 301

Rep: Reputation: 47
Angry linuxquestions.org is blocked here in China


Well, finally. I need to visit here through tunnelling now. Nothing could be more annoying than this.
 
Old 06-15-2013, 09:33 AM   #2
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
So, who is blocking you, this site or the Chinese firewall ?
 
Old 06-15-2013, 09:56 AM   #3
kite
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Shenzhen, China
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 301

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 47
The nasty Chinese Great Firewall! This is a government against its people.
 
Old 06-15-2013, 02:07 PM   #4
tronayne
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Northeastern Michigan, where Carhartt is a Designer Label
Distribution: Slackware 32- & 64-bit Stable
Posts: 3,121

Rep: Reputation: 819Reputation: 819Reputation: 819Reputation: 819Reputation: 819Reputation: 819Reputation: 819
Looks like somebody's watching and reading, see: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...3/#post4965354.
 
Old 06-15-2013, 06:28 PM   #5
tomtomjkw
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 128

Rep: Reputation: 31
I'm not exactly too proud to say that Polish major internet providers had lived up to Chinese standards - I've not been able to browse linuxquestions.org from my home or office for about a month...
 
Old 06-15-2013, 06:32 PM   #6
Celyr
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Italy
Distribution: Slackware+Debian
Posts: 314

Rep: Reputation: 77
What? It should not be possible. Poland is in the UE. There are laws about net neutrality.
 
Old 06-15-2013, 06:36 PM   #7
guanx
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,014

Rep: Reputation: 147Reputation: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by kite View Post
The nasty Chinese Great Firewall! This is a government against its people.
Can you prove it? Is it a connection reset? What happens if you connect to http://75.126.162.205
 
Old 06-16-2013, 04:27 AM   #8
tomtomjkw
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 128

Rep: Reputation: 31
Here are the details. Maybe I'm overreacting, but there's definitely something not right:

1. Local output from my current localization (small local provider):

Quote:
tomtom@tomtom:~$ lynx --dump http://ipecho.net/plain
91.201.121.208

tomtom@tomtom:~$ ping linuxquestions.org
PING linuxquestions.org (75.126.162.205) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from www.linuxquestions.org (75.126.162.205): icmp_req=1 ttl=54 time=159 ms
64 bytes from www.linuxquestions.org (75.126.162.205): icmp_req=2 ttl=54 time=161 ms
64 bytes from www.linuxquestions.org (75.126.162.205): icmp_req=3 ttl=54 time=166 ms
64 bytes from www.linuxquestions.org (75.126.162.205): icmp_req=4 ttl=54 time=171 ms
64 bytes from www.linuxquestions.org (75.126.162.205): icmp_req=5 ttl=54 time=165 ms
64 bytes from www.linuxquestions.org (75.126.162.205): icmp_req=6 ttl=54 time=161 ms
64 bytes from www.linuxquestions.org (75.126.162.205): icmp_req=7 ttl=54 time=161 ms
64 bytes from www.linuxquestions.org (75.126.162.205): icmp_req=8 ttl=54 time=163 ms
64 bytes from www.linuxquestions.org (75.126.162.205): icmp_req=9 ttl=54 time=163 ms
64 bytes from www.linuxquestions.org (75.126.162.205): icmp_req=10 ttl=54 time=168 ms
64 bytes from www.linuxquestions.org (75.126.162.205): icmp_req=11 ttl=54 time=163 ms
^C
--- linuxquestions.org ping statistics ---
12 packets transmitted, 11 received, 8% packet loss, time 11016ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 159.396/164.223/171.823/3.338 ms

2. So let's ssh home (one of 3 biggest providers in Poland):

Quote:
pchlatom@serwer:~$ lynx --dump http://ipecho.net/plain
77.253.177.69

pchlatom@serwer:~$ ping linuxquestions.org
PING linuxquestions.org (75.126.162.205) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- linuxquestions.org ping statistics ---
55 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 54181ms
Maybe there's some weird www blacklist that for some nonsensical reason contains linuxquestions.org and is being used by both Polish and Chinese providers?
 
Old 06-16-2013, 06:11 AM   #9
Celyr
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Italy
Distribution: Slackware+Debian
Posts: 314

Rep: Reputation: 77
Can you try a traceroute?
 
Old 06-16-2013, 06:21 AM   #10
kkady32
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2010
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 86

Rep: Reputation: 14
I'm from Romania and last week i cannot acces LQ 3 days.I write an e-mail to LQ,give my IP.I receive an email from LQ and now is all ok.You cann try this and when problem is from LQ then this will be solved.
 
Old 06-16-2013, 06:25 AM   #11
tomtomjkw
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 128

Rep: Reputation: 31
Traceroute from current location:

Quote:
traceroute to linuxquestions.org (75.126.162.205), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 11.1.5.1 (11.1.5.1) 15.397 ms 20.266 ms 51.673 ms
2 bras.multimetro.pl (91.201.120.1) 52.426 ms 53.119 ms 55.211 ms
3 te4-2.214.ccr01.waw02.atlas.cogentco.com (149.11.6.65) 61.077 ms 89.661 ms 91.749 ms
4 te0-6-0-5.ccr21.waw01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.39.165) 92.816 ms te0-1-0-5.ccr21.waw01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.39.169) 93.896 ms te0-6-0-5.ccr21.waw01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.39.165) 94.964 ms
5 te0-3-1-2.ccr42.ham01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.73.121) 112.589 ms te0-2-1-2.ccr42.ham01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.56.173) 122.669 ms te0-4-1-2.ccr42.ham01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.60.165) 143.702 ms
6 te0-1-0-3.mpd21.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.50.53) 147.584 ms te0-0-0-3.ccr21.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.50.41) 40.849 ms te0-1-0-3.mpd22.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.50.37) 32.512 ms
7 te0-1-0-0.ccr21.ams04.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.39.110) 50.438 ms te0-1-0-3.ccr21.ams04.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.49.10) 64.823 ms 74.322 ms
8 adm-b5-link.telia.net (80.239.128.237) 105.964 ms adm-b3-link.telia.net (213.248.85.109) 219.184 ms adm-b5-link.telia.net (80.239.160.13) 224.365 ms
9 adm-bb4-link.telia.net (213.155.130.42) 241.685 ms adm-bb3-link.telia.net (213.155.136.248) 238.367 ms adm-bb4-link.telia.net (213.155.130.42) 247.240 ms
10 prs-bb2-link.telia.net (213.155.137.161) 251.624 ms prs-bb1-link.telia.net (213.155.137.151) 253.022 ms prs-bb1-link.telia.net (213.155.137.139) 91.051 ms
11 ash-bb3-link.telia.net (80.91.251.98) 177.412 ms ash-bb3-link.telia.net (80.91.252.36) 184.974 ms ash-bb4-link.telia.net (80.91.251.247) 212.848 ms
12 ash-b1-link.telia.net (213.155.136.39) 176.687 ms ash-b1-link.telia.net (213.155.130.73) 182.036 ms ash-b1-link.telia.net (80.91.248.163) 196.032 ms
13 xe-3-0-1.bbr01.eq01.wdc02.networklayer.com (213.248.78.130) 193.854 ms 192.955 ms 196.964 ms
14 ae0.bbr01.tl01.atl01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.153) 208.037 ms 201.657 ms 212.590 ms
15 ae13.bbr02.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com (173.192.18.134) 236.803 ms 237.713 ms 240.170 ms
16 ae7.bbr01.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com (173.192.18.208) 216.549 ms ae1.dar01.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.255) 223.265 ms ae7.bbr01.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com (173.192.18.208) 217.354 ms
17 po2.fcr02.sr04.dal01.networklayer.com (66.228.118.182) 228.215 ms ae0.dar01.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.211) 248.711 ms po1.fcr02.sr04.dal01.networklayer.com (66.228.118.178) 224.950 ms
18 www.linuxquestions.org (75.126.162.205) 222.614 ms 233.597 ms po2.fcr02.sr04.dal01.networklayer.com (66.228.118.182) 232.584 ms
Traceroute from home:

Quote:
traceroute to linuxquestions.org (75.126.162.205), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 11.1.5.1 (11.1.5.1) 0.317 ms 0.398 ms 0.465 ms
2 Jaworzno-bras2.inetia.pl (195.114.190.151) 13.782 ms 13.873 ms 16.496 ms
3 81.210.127.68 (81.210.127.68) 22.179 ms 22.368 ms 22.536 ms
4 xe-5-3-1.fra61.ip4.tinet.net (141.136.97.105) 33.688 ms 34.338 ms 35.524 ms
5 as1299.ip4.tinet.net (77.67.95.182) 38.983 ms as1299.ip4.tinet.net (77.67.67.194) 39.935 ms as1299.ip4.tinet.net (77.67.82.242) 40.899 ms
6 ffm-bb1-link.telia.net (80.91.251.249) 42.373 ms 29.964 ms 30.893 ms
7 ash-bb3-link.telia.net (213.155.135.57) 138.225 ms ash-bb3-link.telia.net (80.91.246.58) 139.957 ms 140.449 ms
8 ash-b1-link.telia.net (80.91.248.157) 140.993 ms ash-b1-link.telia.net (80.91.248.163) 142.182 ms ash-b1-link.telia.net (80.91.248.157) 143.081 ms
9 xe-3-0-1.bbr01.eq01.wdc02.networklayer.com (213.248.78.130) 144.337 ms 145.022 ms 146.211 ms
10 * * *
11 ae13.bbr02.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com (173.192.18.134) 180.998 ms 183.274 ms 182.976 ms
12 ae1.dar01.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.255) 183.897 ms ae1.dar02.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.213) 155.856 ms 189.974 ms
13 po1.fcr02.sr04.dal01.networklayer.com (66.228.118.178) 157.052 ms ae7.dar02.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com (66.228.118.238) 158.484 ms 189.684 ms
14 * * *
15 * * *
16 * * *
17 * * *
18 * * *
19 * * *
20 * * *
21 * * *
22 * * *
23 * * *
24 * * *
25 * * *
26 * * *
27 * * *
28 * * *
29 * * *
30 * * *
 
Old 06-16-2013, 06:43 AM   #12
Celyr
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Italy
Distribution: Slackware+Debian
Posts: 314

Rep: Reputation: 77
So actually is lq provider filtering you, not the opposite
 
Old 06-16-2013, 06:56 AM   #13
k3lt01
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,899

Rep: Reputation: 623Reputation: 623Reputation: 623Reputation: 623Reputation: 623Reputation: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by kite View Post
Well, finally. I need to visit here through tunnelling now. Nothing could be more annoying than this.
Just wondering how is this a Slackware issue?
 
Old 06-16-2013, 07:08 AM   #14
273
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 3,571

Rep: Reputation: 805Reputation: 805Reputation: 805Reputation: 805Reputation: 805Reputation: 805Reputation: 805
I don't think it is the country blocking this site in either case, if you haven't already I suggest a read of this thread:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...xy-4175463390/
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-16-2013, 07:20 AM   #15
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Main: Gentoo Others: What fits the task
Posts: 15,653
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095
We had issues with a mass attack of spammers in the near past, which led us to block certain IP ranges. If you have problems with reaching LQ and you are not blocked by your government please report that to this thread, so that Jeremy can look into it.

Last edited by TobiSGD; 06-16-2013 at 09:43 AM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] LinuxQuestions blocked by "www.stopbadware.org" kikinovak LQ Suggestions & Feedback 4 02-04-2013 03:50 PM
Dynamic DNS problem in China [3322.org Blocked Since 2009-10-05] aquatooth Linux - Networking 2 10-09-2009 12:16 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration