LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-28-2009, 01:34 PM   #1
dasx
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2009
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Linuxpackages dying?


To all the great slackers out there, greetings!

I'm wondering if anyone has any information on what's going on with linuxpackages.net? Since the turn of the year (2009), it seems that the quantity/quality of the packages on linuxpackages has declined remarkably. I'm submitted two packages (deluge 1.1.8 and 1.1.9) and their status has just disappeared into the ether. I've also noticed that a previously regular and large package contributor, Ken Zalewski, (as well as number of formerly large contributors) has stopped contributing. Anyone know why? I know and realize there are other (most likely, better) package repositories (and I've moved more on to just doing packages from slackbuild), but linuxpackages was once one of my ports of call for slack packages. It'd be (in my opinion) a sad day if that site were to fade into oblivion.

Cheers,
dasx
 
Old 06-28-2009, 02:09 PM   #2
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
I don't think it would be too sad. Just use slackbuilds, they usually work a lot better. The quality of packages from linuxpackages was never very good, so ...
http://slackbuilds.org/repository/
http://www.slackware.com/~alien/slackbuilds/
 
Old 06-28-2009, 02:21 PM   #3
hitest
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 4,278

Rep: Reputation: 587Reputation: 587Reputation: 587Reputation: 587Reputation: 587Reputation: 587
dasx,

No loss if linuxpackages.net dies. I don't use any of their packages; slackbuilds.org does the job for me.
 
Old 06-28-2009, 02:26 PM   #4
Dinithion
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: Norway
Distribution: Slackware 14.1
Posts: 443

Rep: Reputation: 56
I've got to agree with dasx. All tho slackbuild is superior to linuxpackages, it is a great offer to new users. I started using packages from linuxpackages when the compilation failed and I was unaware of slackbuilds. Just because someone don't like it, doesn't mean its a good thing they are going down.
 
Old 06-28-2009, 03:14 PM   #5
dugan
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 4,989

Rep: Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
I don't think it would be too sad. Just use slackbuilds, they usually work a lot better. The quality of packages from linuxpackages was never very good, so ...
http://slackbuilds.org/repository/
http://www.slackware.com/~alien/slackbuilds/
And http://www.slacky.edu/

Great repository, and they provide SlackBuilds too.
 
Old 06-28-2009, 03:27 PM   #6
Cotobear
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware 12.0
Posts: 100

Rep: Reputation: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan View Post
And http://www.slacky.edu/

Great repository, and they provide SlackBuilds too.
I'm assuming you meant http://www.slacky.eu/ .
 
Old 06-28-2009, 03:28 PM   #7
Woodsman
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Distribution: Slackware 14.1
Posts: 3,482

Rep: Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534Reputation: 534
I haven't used linuxpackages.net in a couple of years. However, at one time that site offered me something slackbuilds.org does not: compiled packages.

Providing complete packages is against the philosophy of slackbuilds.org, not to mention the additional storage costs and download bandwidth. Yet if linuxpackages.net disappears then the only large repository with compiled packages would be slacky.eu. I wrote large repository, not only repository. Now that slacky.eu is no longer maintained in English (Italian only), navigating that site is cumbersome for those who do not read Italian.

Only a few years ago neither slackbuilds.org nor slacky.eu existed. The linuxpackages.net site served the Slackware community. Many people do not want to build packages. Some people, like me, do not learn to build packages for a while yet they nonetheless want certain packages. Many people do not have the computer muscle to build the large packages. For many years I had such old hardware and could not build such packages even if I knew how or wanted. These days I search for build scripts to compile packages but not in my early days of Slackware. Having a large central repository of compiled packages is nice for many people.

Yes, many Slackers prefer to compile their own packages, but not all. People use Slackware for a variety of reasons. Not all users want to build packages. Not all users have the time or computer horsepower to build packages. The lack of a readily available large central repository is always in the list of reasons why many people do not use Slackware.

My only complaint against linuxpackages.net is the lack of a requirement to include the build scripts with all packages. Not doing so tends to create issues of mistrust and uncertainty. Regardless, I think linuxpackages.net serves a purpose and seeing the site disappear would be unfortunate news.

Last edited by Woodsman; 06-28-2009 at 03:31 PM.
 
Old 06-28-2009, 04:06 PM   #8
dugan
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 4,989

Rep: Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodsman View Post
Now that slacky.eu is no longer maintained in English (Italian only), navigating that site is cumbersome for those who do not read Italian.
I don't find it cumbersome. I just type name of the package I want into the search box in the top left corner. Then I get either a download link or what's obviously a "not found" message. That's all the navigating I need to do there

Quote:
My only complaint against linuxpackages.net is the lack of a requirement to include the build scripts with all packages
They also did not require their packages to be built on clean systems. That was a problem too.

Last edited by dugan; 06-28-2009 at 04:17 PM.
 
Old 06-28-2009, 04:50 PM   #9
hitest
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 4,278

Rep: Reputation: 587Reputation: 587Reputation: 587Reputation: 587Reputation: 587Reputation: 587
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan View Post
They also did not require their packages to be built on clean systems. That was a problem too.
That is my one complaint about linuxpackages.net. Quality control. I doubt the integrity of the packages provided at that site.
I don't have a problem with downloading, installing pre-built packages. However, I will only download, install packages from a few trusted sources. The links in my signature are trustworthy in my opinion.
 
Old 06-28-2009, 05:17 PM   #10
niels.horn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,004

Rep: Reputation: 89
I have used linuxpackages.net in the past (before SlackBuilds.org started and before I knew about slacky.eu) and have had some problems with the quality.

Now I prefer SlackBuilds and compile my own packages.
If I can't find it on SlackBuilds.org I check slacky.eu but I still compile my own packages, as I am testing everything on Slackware64.

I think there is a need for a compiled-packages repository, as not all users want to compile their own applications.
If there is a need to have it in English or any other language, someone will have to stand up and offer to do the localization. That's the way it works with open software.
 
Old 06-28-2009, 08:58 PM   #11
Nille_kungen
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Posts: 216

Rep: Reputation: 44
When i started to use slackware i used linuxpackages but i soon stopped because of the lack of quality.
I remember strange ownership/rights and not build on cleansystems and missing build scripts, i even think that linuxpackages had some own tools or base when they made there packages and that made the few existing SlackBuilds not so great.
Now i only use SBo and sbopkg, but i can understand that some people want compiled packages.
So why don't some of you contact the team behind linuxpackages and start cleaning it up and write rules for packages or start a new project?
I remember using swaret and linuxpackages in my early slackware days (but i can't understand why i did it).
These days i would never install any package from linuxpackages.
 
Old 06-28-2009, 09:28 PM   #12
kc3
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2009
Distribution: Slackware64 13
Posts: 153

Rep: Reputation: 34
Well, idk about LinuxPackages.net but I LOVE Slackbuilds, idk, I can't get their slack packages to ever work though so I just download the source and compile them all and it works fine, anyone else have to do the same thing?
 
Old 06-28-2009, 10:36 PM   #13
niels.horn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,004

Rep: Reputation: 89
Please explain what exactly you can't get to work...
I use SlackBuilds all the time w/o problems.
 
Old 06-28-2009, 10:45 PM   #14
SqdnGuns
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Fountain Valley, CA / Thailand
Distribution: Slackware64 14.0
Posts: 981

Rep: Reputation: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by niels.horn View Post
Please explain what exactly you can't get to work...
I use SlackBuilds all the time w/o problems.
He is referring to LinuxPackages.........
 
Old 06-28-2009, 10:58 PM   #15
akiku
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2009
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 62

Rep: Reputation: 17
I suppose I will the contrarian on this thread and go on record that, in my experience, linuxpackages.net does fill a need that slackbuilds.org cannot: providing a repository of compiled packages for large applications, particularly ones with *lots* of dependencies.

I use mostly old hw or a wimpy netbook with little storage, memory and cpu power, so I try to avoid compiling the big stuff. And I've never experienced the quality issues so many pointed out here.
 
  


Reply

Tags
slackware


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
linuxpackages.net - how access? Samsara Slackware 1 08-02-2005 06:27 PM
KDE 3.4 now available on LinuxPackages apachedude Slackware 12 03-22-2005 06:40 AM
avideumux from linuxpackages Alinuxnoob Linux - Software 2 10-02-2004 06:02 AM
Anybody tried X11R6 6.8.0 from LinuxPackages ? snop Slackware 14 09-13-2004 12:25 PM
Linuxpackages.net Mux General 17 10-25-2002 03:24 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration