LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-27-2004, 08:32 PM   #1
carboncopy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Malaysia
Distribution: Fedora Core, Slackware, Mac OS X, Debian, OpenSUSE
Posts: 1,210
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 45
Linux Kernel Development impact on Slackware


Hi!

Just read this on slashdot http://developers.slashdot.org/artic...&tid=8&tid=106.
It says that the linux kernel development would be continued on 2.6 branch and stabilization would be up to Linux Distribution.

How would this impact Slackware? Since Slackware don't change the kernel at all.

And the original news from here: http://www.kerneltrap.org/node/view/3513
 
Old 07-27-2004, 09:15 PM   #2
WMD
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Florida
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 484

Rep: Reputation: 30
Patrick V. is tentitive to switch to kernel 2.6 - in 10.0 it has to be installed manually. As long as 2.6 stays unstable, Pat can keep 2.4 the default. Then, when 2.7 DOES start (it'll just be later than usual), Slackware can switch to a then-more stable 2.6.

After all, Slack is fast enough for it to not need 2.6.
 
Old 07-27-2004, 11:27 PM   #3
eelriver
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: san francisco
Distribution: Slackware 10.2 kernel 2.6.13, Gentoo amd64, Some mish-mash of programs that started with slack 9.0
Posts: 165

Rep: Reputation: 30
I'm not too worried about it. I think most Slack users compile their own kernel anyway. Most of the other distros patch the kernel to add some feature not included in the base kernel and I think Linus and the gang are just trying to avoid piling on all these "extras". I've been using a self compiled 2.6 kernel since it came out and I've found it extremely stable.
 
Old 07-28-2004, 03:45 AM   #4
gnashley
Amigo developer
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,755

Rep: Reputation: 466Reputation: 466Reputation: 466Reputation: 466Reputation: 466
Interesting quote from the interview with Andrew Morton:
"The 2.4.x core has only stabilized very recently and there remains quite a bit of tuning and mop-up work."
Very unusual bit about the distributors finishing the stabilizing of a kernel, also.
most kernel trees gain true stability, while including most of the planned features of that tree, at about patch 20-30.
And in Slackware the magic number has mostly been .1 8.1, 9.1... 10.1?
i think any considerations Patrcik V might have had in delaying or not the introduction of 10.0 had more to do with waitnig for the 2.4.27 kernel, which will finally have full support for sata drives( the last major feature to be intro'd to the 2.4 tree. I think the Slack criteria for stability will keep the 2.6 kernel 'out' as the standard kernel family for another dozen patches or so.
2.4.27 is quite close now(days/weeks?) and the 2.6 makes mostly steady progress, so I'm watching out for Slack 10.1. I do hope they clean up a few things. Frankly, since Slack 8.1 quite a few ornery 'quirks' have been steadily creeping into Slack. i called them 'bugs' one day and was immediately challenged, and really 'quirks' is a better way to describe them- little permissions problems, buggy scripts and bootdisks, and here's a cute one: You can still be fooled into thinking you need it, by reding the Slack book, and you can still click a livk to download color.gz installation disk, which has been a zero-byte file since Slack 7.0 or before. I still sometimes post to tell someone they don't need color.gz and that rawrite handle zero-byte images.
Nevertheless, Slack is the only game in town for me.
 
Old 07-28-2004, 07:57 AM   #5
carboncopy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Malaysia
Distribution: Fedora Core, Slackware, Mac OS X, Debian, OpenSUSE
Posts: 1,210
Blog Entries: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 45
Yuh I know that Slackware 10.0 comes with 2.6.7 as an option in Disk 2.

What I wanted to point out is that, it seems that the Linux Kernel Development model has changed.

What has it changed too?

From: It is used to be Even Number for stable and Odd Number for development.

To: It seems that with the new Kernel Development Model (reported by the link above) implys that the development would be done on 2.6 tree itself.
 
Old 07-28-2004, 03:43 PM   #6
gnashley
Amigo developer
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,755

Rep: Reputation: 466Reputation: 466Reputation: 466Reputation: 466Reputation: 466
...until such time as the number of patches justifies the branching of the tree, he continued.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
C++ or pure C for Linux kernel module, Linux device driver development. What to use? Igor007 Programming 91 07-19-2014 11:55 AM
Red Hat Linux 9 Kernel Development Picture trkc Linux - Newbie 2 09-13-2005 08:06 PM
Linux kernel development vwal_13 Programming 3 03-09-2005 02:27 AM
Can anyone be part of Linux kernel development team dkotian Linux - Software 1 10-31-2004 10:15 AM
will kernel upgrade from 2.4.2 to 2.4.20 impact other software like gnome, dameons,.. jkmin Linux - Newbie 24 02-22-2003 03:20 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration