SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
As long as the 64 bit processor is x86 compatible... ;-)
The AMD 64 Athlon works with the default kernel but you benefit from using a custom kernel compiled for the 64 bit processor. I think there are different versions from Intel and some are not x86 compatible.
You could also take a look at the unofficial slackware port www.slamd64.com
kind of curious about this as well, since i'm installing slack 10.2 on a buddies athlon 64 laptop.
had a small look at slamd64 for a brief moment, but i'm not so sure if that will bring such a great increase in performance (anybody knows if its really worth the while????)
but once again, curious about the answer to DesertVikings question!
It's as easy to compile a 64 bit AMD compatible kernel as any other kernel compile. Have you made it once there's no bigg thing. Just use your old config and change the processor type etc.
The biggest increase in speed is when you have memory intensive work and a lot of RAM. I'm working with scientific calculations and structural analysis (Finite Element Modelling) etc, then the 64 bit system makes my day. A 32 bit sytem like w2k can only adress ~2GB RAM and WXP 3GB with a special tweak. Using a 64 bit system give you enough head room so you can fill your mobo with as much RAM as it can carry. No need to swap any more... :-)
For "regular" computer tasks I don't think the difference is that big but when you have a 64 bit processor why not use a 64 bit system?
I think theres a bit more too it than just the kernel, to gain performance you may also need all the 64bit libraries and applications.
I couldn't get slamd64 to work properly with my laptop hardware so i put on SuSE 64bit and it has a separate set of directories for the 32bit libraries to provide functionality with 32bit apps, but the standard libraries are 64bit i believe.
I successfully installed Slamd64 on a XP3200+ 64. And i was amazed. I did some long compile like xmame and i was suprised to see that the compile time was divided by two compared to a 3200+ 32. The desktop use was really punchy.
It's not Slackware in the exact sense, but try Slamd64.It's a Slackware port over to AMD64. I run it on my laptop and really have had excellent luck. It for all intents and purposes, appears just like a Slackware install...is Slack for all intents and purposes...just for AMD64. Check it out at:
my sister is planning to buy a pc this coming december,
should we buy cpu w/ 64bit processor, regardless of the 64-bit issues in slackware?
you see we don't want to switch into other distro, except slackware. is slamd64 is ok though it is unofficial slackware 64-bit port?
Not to hijack, but I have a Dell with a Pentium 4 521 with "Intel® Extended Memory 64 Technology" (EM64T) and supporting chipset. I'm not sure what the benefit of this is really, except being able to address large amounts of RAM (I "only" have 1 GB) and doing 64 bit integer arithmetic which should be pretty rare in normal operation. Thinking that using it (whatever that means) would increase the size of "int" from 4 to 8 bytes, it sounds mostly like a waste of memory.
Is there any benefit in doing something about this?