SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
As stated, the discussion just opens. This matter is still some time from fruition. That being said though I do use and really quite like KDE. I also am quite understanding of Eric's point that it might have to be dropped. We will see where the chips fall....it will be an interesting period of time.
I maintain a music player for KDE, so this decision would make it more difficult for me to stick with Slackware.
This is what worries me about both GNOME and KDE: they have become The Platform and instead of writing apps for X, people start writing them for one or other DE and limiting the usefulness of them because of their choice of DE.
Though I'm not going to criticise anyone who gives their software away for free, it saddens me whenever I see the phrase "This is a really great App but it's KDE4/GNOME (delete as applicable) only" and I'll always choose standalone GTK or Qt apps over a GNOME or KDE specific one in order to prevent this sort of lock-in.
I quite like KDE, but Eric is entitled to some free time. If KDE was dropped, I'd certainly manage with one of the many alternative DE/WMs. It wouldn't drive me away from Slackware, that's for sure.
This is what worries me about both GNOME and KDE: they have become The Platform and instead of writing apps for X, people start writing them for one or other DE and limiting the usefulness of them because of their choice of DE.
Though I'm not going to criticise anyone who gives their software away for free, it saddens me whenever I see the phrase "This is a really great App but it's KDE4/GNOME (delete as applicable) only" and I'll always choose standalone GTK or Qt apps over a GNOME or KDE specific one in order to prevent this sort of lock-in.
Same here. Krusader would be the best file manager in history if it weren't for the KDE dependencies.
This is what worries me about both GNOME and KDE: they have become The Platform and instead of writing apps for X, people start writing them for one or other DE and limiting the usefulness of them because of their choice of DE.
Though I'm not going to criticise anyone who gives their software away for free, it saddens me whenever I see the phrase "This is a really great App but it's KDE4/GNOME (delete as applicable) only" and I'll always choose standalone GTK or Qt apps over a GNOME or KDE specific one in order to prevent this sort of lock-in.
---
POST # 2000! OMG!
So on the one hand Linux is criticized for not being at well integrated or unified in UI/UX as Windows or OSX, but on the other we're criticizing people who write well integrated applications?
I agree that the redundancy of having g*, k*, and x* frontends for everything is silly, but you really can't have it both ways. Either software is written to be standalone and independent or software is written to be well integrated and cohesive with the rest of system. Either way someone will complain.
I hope KDE doesn't get dropped. I appreciate the time you put into the KDE packages AlienBob. The 4.6 packages are working very nicely for me. Thank you!
In the past I used KDE, but since the onset of 4.x I have found myself more fond of XFCE and Fluxbox.
Whatever Decision that Pat and the Crew make is what I will follow because if you ever need anything you can always build it yourself or get it from slackbuilds.org
P.S. Whatever you have sounds like it sucks Eric. Hope you feel better.
So on the one hand Linux is criticized for not being at well integrated or unified in UI/UX as Windows or OSX, but on the other we're criticizing people who write well integrated applications?
The way I see it is that newcomers from Windows want unification, while advanced Linux users want simplicity (as in simpler program code, not necessarily newbie-friendliness) and less useless dependencies.
I'm a happy KDE user today, I like the eye candy and a couple of applications. However, I realize XFCE is a complete and powerful DE, too. So if Slackware went that way for a reason I'd change my ways and follow.
I use and like kde but have recently flirted with dwm. Dwm is an option for me because I have to use google apps for work and so a browser is the main requirement.
I reckon I could live without kde in slackware but it would be a bit of a loss.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.