LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-13-2005, 09:56 AM   #1
AxXium
Zenwalk Admin
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Louisiana, U.S.A.
Distribution: Zenwalk Gnu/Linux
Posts: 258

Rep: Reputation: 31
Kernel 2.6.11.12 Stable is out!!!!


Yeah!!

Now I got something to do
 
Old 06-13-2005, 09:42 PM   #2
cereal83
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 478

Rep: Reputation: 30
It only has like 4 bug fixes. Nothing to jump to high about!

I am waiting for 2.8 :P lol I mean 2.6.12
 
Old 06-14-2005, 03:33 AM   #3
davidsrsb
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Distribution: Slackware 13.37 current
Posts: 770

Rep: Reputation: 33
Nothing to get excited about unless you have x86_64 SMP, not many Slackers use hfs
 
Old 06-14-2005, 04:17 AM   #4
shilo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Stockton, CA
Distribution: Slackware 11 - kernel 2.6.19.1 - Dropline Gnome 2.16.2
Posts: 1,132

Rep: Reputation: 49
Quote:
not many Slackers use hfs
Just the hfsplus for the iPod. Couldn't be bothered with converting the native filesystem.

I think, too, that the changelogs are a little misleading. If I am right, the changelog is only noting the changes since the last rc. If you don't install the rc releases, there are actually a lot more changes than the changelog notes. I could be wrong, but I swear that the changelog on the rc releases was much longer than these few entries.
 
Old 06-14-2005, 01:39 PM   #5
dhave
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: still outside the Matrix
Distribution: Arch, formerly Gentoo and Slackware
Posts: 438

Rep: Reputation: 31
A question and a comment on this topic:

(1) For kernel version designations, if the first number is the "major" number, the second is the "minor", and the third is the "release" number, what's the fourth number called? For example, in 2.6.11.12, what do we call the position that the "12" is in?

(2) In the changelog recently, I was amused to see PV delicately refer to these 2.6.11.x releases as "sucker kernels". Now I know PV is just a mere mortal (as underscored by the events of last winter), but I suppose his comment did make me less enthusiastic about compiling and installing every one of these 2.6.11.ad.infinitum jobs that shows up at www.kernel.org -- at least not without finding a compelling reason to do so.

I used to change the oil in my car a lot more frequently than I do now, too. And I also used to clean up my espresso machine after each use (now it looks like it belongs more in a gas station than in a yuppie's kitchen). I still try to tell my wife I love her at least once a day, though. Otherwise, she'd start getting jealous of all the time I spend with Slackware.

Last edited by dhave; 06-14-2005 at 01:44 PM.
 
Old 06-14-2005, 01:46 PM   #6
xushi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,288

Rep: Reputation: 45
Quote:
Jan Kara:
ext3: fix log_do_checkpoint() assertion failure
Sounds important to me .. anyway i like upgrading takes me 10 minuts..
 
Old 06-14-2005, 01:49 PM   #7
gbonvehi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Argentina (SR, LP)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,145

Rep: Reputation: 51
Quote:
Originally posted by dhave
A question and a comment on this topic:

(1) For kernel version designations, if the first number is the "major" number, the second is the "minor", and the third is the "release" number, what's the fourth number called? For example, in 2.6.11.12, what do we call the position that the "12" is in?
Since a recent change in the software kernel developers used to keep control of the kernel sources, they've started to make "smaller" releases, that's the 4th number. They're like beta versions in case you need a feature on them.
 
Old 06-14-2005, 02:11 PM   #8
IceR
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Poland
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 0
I use it too, I like have everything fresh But I didn`t notice nothing special in this kernel release.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
kernel 2.6 is not stable! eranb2 Linux - General 4 04-01-2005 04:42 PM
Broad question: Is kernel 2.6.9 really stable? What is the best 2.6.x kernel? jtp51 Slackware 16 10-27-2004 01:29 PM
Is kernel 2.6.7 a stable?? halo14 Debian 3 08-20-2004 05:37 AM
Kernel 2.4 or 2.6? Which is more stable? make Linux - General 6 06-22-2004 09:41 PM
Kernel 2.4, stable? Squall Linux - General 3 02-09-2004 01:06 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration