Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
09-08-2012, 12:29 AM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Montpezat (South France)
Distribution: Slackware, Slackware64
Posts: 773
|
Java plugin alert
Hi,
When browsing the web - using Seamonkey or Firefox - I get a Security alert about the installed JRE plugin, and a notification that this plugin will be deactivated.
How serious is the security threat? What's the best remedy to the problem? Is there a patch somewhere to fix this?
|
|
|
|
09-08-2012, 12:55 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Montpezat (South France)
Distribution: Slackware, Slackware64
Posts: 773
Original Poster
|
's OK. After googling some more, I found the answer to my question. In another thread on LQ.
|
|
|
|
09-08-2012, 06:55 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Northeastern Michigan, where Carhartt is a Designer Label
Distribution: Slackware 32- & 64-bit Stable
Posts: 2,438
|
If you are using Oracle Java (as I am) be aware that there are other problems; from Java Still Not Safe, Security Experts Say ( http://www.informationweek.com/secur...-say/240006876:
Quote:
Last week, Oracle released emergency updates to fix zero-day vulnerabilities in Java 7 and Java 6. But in the case of the Java 7 fix, the new version allows an existing flaw--spotted by security researchers and disclosed to Oracle earlier this year--to be exploited to bypass the Java sandbox. In other words, while fixing some flaws, Oracle opened the door to another one.
In light of that situation, multiple security experts said that businesses should continue to temporarily disable all Java use, whenever possible. "There are still not-yet-addressed, serious security issues that affect the most recent version of Java 7," said Adam Gowdiak, CEO and founder of Poland-based Security Explorations, which initially disclosed the exploited vulnerabilities to Oracle in April. "In that context, disabling Java until proper patches are available seems to be an adequate solution," he said via email.
|
Essentially, keep an eye on news reports and http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/index.html until things get fixed.
Hope this helps some.
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
09-15-2012, 02:08 AM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Montpezat (South France)
Distribution: Slackware, Slackware64
Posts: 773
Original Poster
|
Now I know that in theory, there's no security threat involved in letting the plugin activated, I wonder if there's a way to disable the security alert from popping up at seemingly random intervals. I'm thinking about my users, who will not hesitate to phone me at 7 AM on a Sunday to whine into the phone : "I HAVE A SECURITY ALERT !?! DID I CATCH A VIRUS ?!? BUT YOU SAID YOUR LINUX THINK WAS IMMUNE TO VIRUSES !?! WHAT DO I HAVE TO DO NOW ?!?"
|
|
|
|
09-15-2012, 08:24 AM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Northeastern Michigan, where Carhartt is a Designer Label
Distribution: Slackware 32- & 64-bit Stable
Posts: 2,438
|
I'm not sure that you actually can disable the security alert in, say, Firefox or Seamonkey (unless you went into the source code and did it there?). It pops up every so often because Firefox and Seamonkey check plugins and add-on periodically.
Might not be a bad idea to notify users, perhaps by having them read the US-CERT article at http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/636312 or include the instructions from that article about how to disable the plug-in (with the links).
Probably better than calls at 0700 Sunday, eh?
Hope this helps some.
Last edited by tronayne; 09-15-2012 at 08:26 AM.
|
|
|
|
09-15-2012, 11:05 AM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Montpezat (South France)
Distribution: Slackware, Slackware64
Posts: 773
Original Poster
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tronayne
I'm not sure that you actually can disable the security alert in, say, Firefox or Seamonkey (unless you went into the source code and did it there?). It pops up every so often because Firefox and Seamonkey check plugins and add-on periodically.
Might not be a bad idea to notify users, perhaps by having them read the US-CERT article at http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/636312 or include the instructions from that article about how to disable the plug-in (with the links).
Probably better than calls at 0700 Sunday, eh?
Hope this helps some.
|
Isn't there even one single option in the ocean of about :config that tells Seamonkey/Firefox to just STFU about this? The question is: which one?
|
|
|
|
09-15-2012, 01:45 PM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Coal Township PA
Distribution: Slackware64-14.0 (3.9.3) UEFI enabled
Posts: 281
Rep:
|
Proactive
kikinovak
Be proactive send all your customers an email stating:
"We have already repaired the security flaw described in the notification for java you are receiving in your browser, please ignore it.
We at (insert company name here) are always looking out for your best interest
We are current developing a fix for the Firefox alert"
LOL
john
|
|
|
|
09-15-2012, 02:10 PM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Montpezat (South France)
Distribution: Slackware, Slackware64
Posts: 773
Original Poster
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlleyTrotter
kikinovak
Be proactive send all your customers an email stating:
"We have already repaired the security flaw described in the notification for java you are receiving in your browser, please ignore it.
We at (insert company name here) are always looking out for your best interest
We are current developing a fix for the Firefox alert"
LOL
john
|
The problem is: my users are mostly students, and I don't have their every single mail address. Nah, deactivate the security check it must be.
|
|
|
|
09-15-2012, 03:30 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-14.0
Posts: 2,192
|
See here and here. From the first link:
Quote:
" I solved it. Proceed at your own risk
Open new Tab
Navigate to about:config
Accept security warning
Change extensions.blocklist.enabled to false
Restart browser
This prevents firefox from checking the blocklist you have configured at extensions.blocklist.detailsURL "
|
I would personally be wary about doing this...at least it would require more vigilance in monitoring your plugins manually for potential vulnerabilities (though I understand why, in your situation, it may be desirable).
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
09-15-2012, 03:42 PM
|
#10
|
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Laptop: Slackware 14.0 // Desktop: Slackware64 14.0 // Netbook: Slackware 14.0
Posts: 6,183
|
Try Eric's OpenJRE and iced-tea packages, mentioned here:
http://alien.slackbook.org/blog/open...es-more-flaws/
|
|
|
|
09-15-2012, 04:17 PM
|
#11
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Montpezat (South France)
Distribution: Slackware, Slackware64
Posts: 773
Original Poster
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by T3slider
See here and here. From the first link:
I would personally be wary about doing this...at least it would require more vigilance in monitoring your plugins manually for potential vulnerabilities (though I understand why, in your situation, it may be desirable).
|
T3slider, you're a star! That's exactly what I've been looking for.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|