SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm running Slackware current on an AthlonXP machine
with KDE 3.4.2 and kernel 2.4.32.
I'm having trouble with the "kded media manager" so I've disabled it and mount/unmount from cli.
The problem with "kded..." is constant cpu usage of about 5% with occasional spikes, and from what I've gathered, it's not an uncommon problem.
I've heard this is solved by going to 2.6.x with HAL and DBUS.
I was hoping to avoid a kernel upgrade until 2.6 is well mature.
Does any one know if KDE 3.5.x is any better in this
regard when using 2.4.x?
I'd really like to have a fully functioning KDE, just
for the sake of convenience.
I was hoping to avoid a kernel upgrade until 2.6 is well mature.
Dude, it's at 2.6.15 now!
When do you think it will be mature enough? When 2.8 comes out?
Take my word for it, it is well worth upgrading to 2.6.x, as it is much better both anecdotally, and in real world benchmarks. See for example: http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/
If you are worried about stability, just hang back a couple of minor versions, ie: I am currently using 2.6.13 on my desktop.
Thanks bulliver, but I was being a little breif about 2.6.x.
There are practical reasons, as well, for me staying with 2.4.x.
I'll address those issues sometime, but right now I'm still
interested in knowing if any one has experience with KDE 3.5,
kded media manager, and kern. 2.4.x.
Sincerely, i dont think that there are good news for us (im facing the same problem as u).
while i dont mind to mount/umount/access devices throuhg CLI, i would prefer having a complete functioning KDE, but i think that it is not going to be possible (not without kernel upgrades), so im staying with the CLI.
Are you aware that you in fact don't need to use CLI to do the mounting? You can also create a (permanent) icon on your Desktop (right-click on Desktop, Create new ---> link to device, point to drive) and then mount/unmount it by right-clicking the device icon and selecting mount resp. unmount.
I'm usually doing it like this as I'm running a 2.4 kernel too. Additionally I'd have all KDE daemons deactivated in control center if I were using KDE right now.
Offtopic: Right now I'm using matchbox as my window manager. Anyone heard of that? It's quite nice...
Last edited by General Failure; 02-20-2007 at 11:05 AM.
In KDE Control Center under "KDE Services" or similar (I use German i18n) you can start, stop and disable several, well, KDE services like for example the media manager. Benefit: Save a little RAM.
Matchbox is a windowmanager originally designed for pdas, quite lightweight and optically appealing.
Have a nice day (whatever timezone you're in) folks!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.