Is GnomeSlackBuild dead?
Is GnomeSlackBuild dead?
Last GitHub activity: 3 months ago. I would have expected a storm of activity since then, to keep up with the slackware-current updates. Development mailing list: last post was in January. |
As far as I know, the project is dead.
Eric |
Quote:
|
Kudos for their effort, and for me, Gnome died before GSB.
|
Agreed with the two posts above. GSB was a good project that maintained an excellent relationship with the Slackware community. I'm sad to see it go.
|
The fact is people participate in development or package maintaining usually because they have an interest in the project in someway.
Not sure, but maybe, the GSB team weren't happy with the direction Gnome took with Gnome3. |
Keep Gnomes in the garden, and off the desktop. :)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
EDIT: This apparently has a Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travelling_gnome_prank |
Quote:
|
Gnome2 is still a fairly decent desktop environment compared to Gnome3. Gnome2 is kinda like Xfce as it's fairly lightweight and all. I know the BSDs and other UNIX systems still use Gnome2 in some ways.
Gnome3 is just a mangled train wreck. Even the Gnome developers hate Gnome3. |
I'd like to see a MATESlackBuild project, but won't be taking it on myself. If anyone wants to do that though, I'd be happy to work with the project to make sure that we've got a proper foundation for it, much like we did with GSB.
|
|
It is. And all the dependencies listed can benefit of either a package included in Slackware 14 or a SlackBuild provided @ http://slackbuilds.org.
So, this project seems feasible. |
Quote:
-JJ |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 PM. |