LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-08-2010, 09:04 PM   #1
windtalker10
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Kentucky
Distribution: Slackware13.1
Posts: 214

Rep: Reputation: 38
Is anyone using Salix?


Right now I'm running 12.2 with the KDE dektop and my hd is running out of room.
For some reason X has started to crash now and then.
Not very often but an annoyance because it only seems to want to crash while I'm working.
I do Internet Marketing and build a lot of websites.
That kind of sux when I haven't saved my work and have to start over.
I had downloaded Slack 13,, whichever is the newest and installed it with XFCE to my 250 gig hd and had no X at all.
Gave up after awhile trying to figure out why and just saw Salix at Distrowatch and am downloading it now.
Is it as reliable and useable as Slack has always been for me,,,, until recently that is.
 
Old 07-08-2010, 09:16 PM   #2
linus72
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Gordonsville-AKA Mayberry-Virginia
Distribution: PocketWriter/MinimalX
Posts: 5,059

Rep: Reputation: 330Reputation: 330Reputation: 330Reputation: 330
hey
yeah, SalixOS is kinda like as Ubuntu is to Debian
it's a customized and fully compatible Slackware based distro
so it has many "helper" apps, etc

but, first, maybe you could just debug whats wrong with XFCE slackware 13 you have?

it's probably something small
 
Old 07-08-2010, 09:23 PM   #3
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 201Reputation: 201Reputation: 201
I used Salix for a bit for some of the ease of use features, and I can recommend it. It's efforts to minimize the size of the install were a mild annoyance for me, but not a big deal. In the end I went back to a full Slackware. There is a good chance that the issues you had with Slackware 13(.1?) will exist in Salix, although If you got bit by this Gapan, who is one of the Salix devs has a workaround posted in that thread.
 
Old 07-08-2010, 10:01 PM   #4
windtalker10
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Kentucky
Distribution: Slackware13.1
Posts: 214

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 38
Thx for the response guys.
I have an nv card and not an intel.
I don't recall the error message I had beyond something was missing in order to have graphics.
I had checked the md5sum as always and it was correct.
I had also reburned the dvd and got the same results.
I dunno what was changed graphics wise from 12.2 to 13.1 but I know it isn't friendly to this old 486.
I may very well have the same results from Salix but I'm curious to find out.
Probably will if all they've done is add gslapt and a few other things.
Btw, it was 13.1 I installed and had the probs with.
13 installed fine but I got rid of it due to the kde.

Last edited by windtalker10; 07-08-2010 at 10:03 PM.
 
Old 07-08-2010, 10:41 PM   #5
lumak
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 799
Blog Entries: 32

Rep: Reputation: 109Reputation: 109
Overall I would give Salix a thumbs up. However, it is not up to par with Slackware. I'm sure if you give it some time the things will settle out.

Cons:
- The installer (at least 13.0.2a) couldn't do an advanced install of lilo. The installer also auto quit and rebooted the computer to prevent proper setup of your customizations. Luks/LVM for example.
- Useless substitutions were made. Thunder bird was replaced by claws mail and gvim was removed. Granted, gvim is cryptic to most people and breaks the 'one program per task' concept.
- Cryptic packaging process. SlackBuilds are easy, why attempt to change them? As far as the programs I needed for my Tablet PC, I'm now forced to decide to support two packaging systems?
- There were a few other things but I can't think of them at the moment.

Pros:... From a Tablet PC point of view
- Gnome Libs for major compatibility with many good looking programs.
- Good repository of extra software
- Dependency tracking slapt-get
- Reasonable defaults
- Good documentation relating to the OS, especially for package requirements.

Indifferent:
- Nice branding
- Personally, I would have gone with fluxbox... But that requires more setup on the user's half to be useful.
- Runlevel 4 by default.

The cons were really big ones for me... If I wasn't working out kinks in a good Tablet PC setup, they would be show stoppers. I like manually doing everything.
 
Old 07-08-2010, 11:49 PM   #6
sahko
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,041

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Not a fan of derivative distributions in general (unless they differentiate significantly from their roots) but in particular things like this are putting me off.
In particular post no.13 which shows little relevance to ffmpeg.
Also the fact that the differences in packages in compare to Slackware arent stated anywhere. Theres more now than before, but noones cared to document them.
Compatibility is stated nevertheless.
 
Old 07-09-2010, 02:04 AM   #7
tallship
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: On the Beaches of Super Sunny Southern San Clemente, California USA
Distribution: Slackware - duh!
Posts: 520
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 112Reputation: 112
Exclamation Wow, that's almost disgusting....

Quote:
Originally Posted by linus72 View Post
hey
yeah, SalixOS is kinda like as Ubuntu is to Debian
um... I really hate to say this, but nectarine really is to peach, as tangerine is to orange.

Hm...

I don't use Debuntu much, but as you can tell by my little derogatory there, I note it's relation to Debian GNU/Linux, another distro I really respect and like, yet observe the subject of the sentence with rather mild aversion.

Don't get me wrong. Ubuntu and its various sub-distros, if you will (and they're forking further and further away from each other all the time), are really good stuff indeed! Just not my stuff.

Now, I run SalixOS on a couple of boxes and I've been very impressed - it has a dependency tracking packaging system and it's own package repositories which, if you take a minute to check out, are actually [almost] completely Slackware compatible.

Not only that, but You can use the Slackware package repository as well, and it's compatible with SalixOS too

I like it a lot, the only thing though, is that it isn't actually Slackware, and if you're having a Slackware config issue, you're most likely going to experience a most similar issue on a distro so closely fashioned after Slackware.

@Damgar's, and in particular, @Linux72's advice to you is right on the money AFAIC, and if you're having a particular software issue w/Slackware it might just be best to work that particular issue out on your box - it shouldn't be that difficult, and IMNSHO, it isn't prudent to start Distro hopping just coz you've got one or two thangs messin' about wit'cha

Whichever Distro you land on, just embrace it, and make it work for you, coz regardless it's gonna be better than something by mACROSfOT.

And, when it comes to the stability and maturity of a Distro, there is indeed an awful lot to say about the candor and decorum of the maintainers, as @sahko pointed out about THIS POST HERE.

Again, I like SalixOS, but there are reasons why Zen and the others forked away from each other and those reasons aren't because the software wasn't good

You might think it somewhat odd that Patrick isn't prominently on the 'scene', or all that vocal publicly, but there's been so little actually significant controversy over Slackware Linux in the last 17 years, and most of that had to do when he arbitrarily bumped the Slackware version up to 7.0 (Or when he went to ELF - Both of which are of zero consequence) just to show people how ludicrous the significance of version numbers can be in the grand scheme of things

It's not just the software itself that brings fresh n00bs and our fellow Slackers into the foray of professionals that stake the reputations of our companies, clients, and careers upon Patrick's [potentially free] product.

um... well I guess that's my 14 and a half cents worth on this topic.

I hope that helps

Kindest regards,

Last edited by tallship; 07-09-2010 at 02:37 AM.
 
Old 07-09-2010, 03:29 AM   #8
gapan
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Posts: 343

Rep: Reputation: 105Reputation: 105
Quote:
Originally Posted by linus72 View Post
yeah, SalixOS is kinda like as Ubuntu is to Debian
Not even close. Ubuntu is not at all compatible with Debian.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lumak View Post
- The installer (at least 13.0.2a) couldn't do an advanced install of lilo. The installer also auto quit and rebooted the computer to prevent proper setup of your customizations. Luks/LVM for example.
Fixed in 13.1.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lumak View Post
- Useless substitutions were made. Thunder bird was replaced by claws mail and gvim was removed. Granted, gvim is cryptic to most people and breaks the 'one program per task' concept.
Who's preventing you from using thunderbird or anything else? It is still available. Salix even provides localization packages for it. We like claws-mail. You like thunderbird. What's the big deal? You could even do a 'basic' mode installation and add anything you want on top of it. That's what it's there for.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lumak View Post
- Cryptic packaging process. SlackBuilds are easy, why attempt to change them? As far as the programs I needed for my Tablet PC, I'm now forced to decide to support two packaging systems?
Huh? Can you explain what you find "cryptic"? Anyone is free to use SlackBuilds. However we have our own system of building packages that resembles the way packages are created in Arch very closely. We like it a lot and it helped us populate our repositories with slackware compatible packages. We couldn't have done it that easy with SlackBuilds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sahko View Post
but in particular things like this are putting me off.
In particular post no.13 which shows little relevance to ffmpeg.
Your point being?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sahko View Post
Also the fact that the differences in packages in compare to Slackware arent stated anywhere. Theres more now than before, but noones cared to document them.
http://www.salixos.org/wiki/index.ph...from_Slackware
Happy?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tallship View Post
Now, I run SalixOS on a couple of boxes and I've been very impressed - it has a dependency tracking packaging system and it's own package repositories which, if you take a minute to check out, are actually [almost] completely Slackware compatible.
Why "almost"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tallship View Post
I like it a lot, the only thing though, is that it isn't actually Slackware, and if you're having a Slackware config issue, you're most likely going to experience a most similar issue on a distro so closely fashioned after Slackware.
Sorry, I don't get your logic here. It's because that it isn't actually Slackware, that you're going to have exactly the same issues in both?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tallship View Post
And, when it comes to the stability and maturity of a Distro, there is indeed an awful lot to say about the candor and decorum of the maintainers, as @sahko pointed out about THIS POST HERE.
The "It's my forum" part was obviously a joke. That's what the smiley with the tongue out is in there for. I get it, people should stop making jokes, it hurts their candor and decorum. Whatever.
 
Old 07-09-2010, 03:44 AM   #9
linus72
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Gordonsville-AKA Mayberry-Virginia
Distribution: PocketWriter/MinimalX
Posts: 5,059

Rep: Reputation: 330Reputation: 330Reputation: 330Reputation: 330
Quote:
Originally Posted by linus72 View Post
yeah, SalixOS is kinda like as Ubuntu is to Debian
Not even close. Ubuntu is not at all compatible with Debian.
LOL, your wrong
I mix many pkgs between ubuntu and debian
even between squeeze and lucid

really, SalixOS is somewhat behind Current in releases
like most derivatives; so if you are running current you
will be going backwards

Quote:
I have an nv card and not an intel.
I don't recall the error message I had beyond something was missing in order to have graphics.
WindTalker; did SalixOS boot and play or no?

Please tell us whats up and what exactly goes wrong?
 
Old 07-09-2010, 05:15 AM   #10
hughetorrance
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: London North West
Distribution: x86_64 Slack 13.37 current : +others
Posts: 459

Rep: Reputation: 59
On Topic ... I have had a look at Salix and its Ok but you would be better to fix your X problem and stay with the King of Distros... have you tried using the "vesa" driver or installing the Nvidia driver... ?
 
Old 07-09-2010, 05:45 AM   #11
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
I use salix on my Atom-based computer. Works very well, the install is very easy and smooth (maybe even smoother than Slackware), and it runs great, very stable and nice. They replaced some packages, notably the intel drivers, which is why I am using it.
 
Old 07-09-2010, 07:48 AM   #12
gapan
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Posts: 343

Rep: Reputation: 105Reputation: 105
Quote:
Originally Posted by linus72 View Post
LOL, your wrong
I mix many pkgs between ubuntu and debian
even between squeeze and lucid
Perhaps I'm wrong. I haven't used anything debian based for ages. The last ubuntu version I tried was 6.06.

Quote:
Originally Posted by linus72 View Post
really, SalixOS is somewhat behind Current in releases
like most derivatives; so if you are running current you
will be going backwards
Salix is not somewhat behind current. It doesn't support current. At all. At least not now. Salix will sync with Slackware current when we feel that a new Slackware version is close. That's just based on guessing though.
 
Old 07-09-2010, 08:05 AM   #13
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 7,030
Blog Entries: 52

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I haven't got round to trying Salix yet, but I quite liked Zenwalk, so I should like Salix. I'll try it in VBox when I've finished messing around with ARMedslack.
 
Old 07-09-2010, 08:17 AM   #14
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 201Reputation: 201Reputation: 201
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianL View Post
I haven't got round to trying Salix yet, but I quite liked Zenwalk, so I should like Salix. I'll try it in VBox when I've finished messing around with ARMedslack.
If you like Slackware and XFCE you're pretty well on track to liking Salix. Aside for slapt-get/Gslapt, IMHO, Salix is very much a stripped down Slackware. It's had it's redundant programs removed and if I remember right, things like kernel source aren't installed by default in order to make a smaller install.
 
Old 07-09-2010, 10:07 AM   #15
veeall
Member
 
Registered: May 2007
Location: Estonia
Distribution: Slackware 12.1, slackware64-current
Posts: 255

Rep: Reputation: 43
I installed salix on an old AthlonXP 1800+ machine and it seems to like it a lot.

Boots actually faster than my slack box with an amd dualcore cpu.
Their package manager(spkg-pkgtool) is blazing fast.
Installer gives three easy to understand options on how slim the installation should be.
Slapt-get/Gslapt makes installing easier, though i'd like it to be able to also remove not shared dependencies along with a package - i have the impression that it doesn't do that, i may be wrong.

Sbopkg doesn't work due to different package tools, simple to fix, guidelines are on the salix forum.

edit: since i posted to a wrong thread, i erased what was not relevant to this one.

Last edited by veeall; 07-09-2010 at 11:58 PM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] confused by flash performance Slackware vs Salix damgar Slackware 37 06-30-2010 05:46 PM
Missing brlpdwrapper file in Mandriva and Salix Bald Patches Linux - Hardware 0 06-22-2010 08:17 AM
LXer: Salix 13.1 is here! LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-04-2010 05:30 PM
Icon for Salix users damgar LQ Suggestions & Feedback 5 04-10-2010 09:36 AM
Announcing Salix, a new Slackware based distribution gapan Linux - Distributions 30 12-28-2009 01:08 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration