Bit late, sorry, but I think it would be best if I cleared this up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didier Spaier
You claim your responses to be a member's ones, then that I could have violated the LQ rules in the OP, which is the role of a moderator.
|
No, or rather:
not entirely. LQ wouldn't have lasted as long as it does and it wouldn't be any good without heavily relying on peer moderation. However...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didier Spaier
Or if you really thought from the inception that I violated the LQ rules, you could have just stated that as a moderator and maybe closed the thread. I wouldn't have protested.
|
There are LQ Rules which you adhere to and
on top of that there are stringent rules LQ Moderators have to adhere to. One of them is that for reasons of impartiality a moderator participating in a thread as a LQ member should avoid moderating the same thread. It's quite customary for one mod to hand off that task to another mod.
So, yes, if a moderator already participated as LQ member you should have.
Any response to this: please use email or PM, thanks.
