SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
That's an interesting thread, but I question the veracity. I just checked freshmeat, and swaret is still there, contrary to the information in that forum.
Also, notice that there's no link for the article purportedly cited from freshmeat; we don't know who originally wrote it, or from what context.
I personally wouldn't use ANY upgrade software. I don#t like to turn so much control over. I hear of more problems created than problems solved. I think most people are over-zealous about upgrading anyway. the only good reason to update ANYTHING is if it will fix a specific security bug.
I much prefer to keep things nice and stable and upgrade selectively from time to time a certain package or two.
just LOOK at all the problems people have upgrading to kernel 2.6.x! I'd much rather stay with 2.4.x until they get to about 2.6.20 or so...
never buy a new car model the first year it comes out.
about the article- I had seen this thread before and I have seen some VERY aggressive promotion of swaret here and on other forums, so as always I'll expect a little flaming for my current comments...
It is not possible to use a slackware package to upgrade to the new 2.6 kernel series, as it does not yet exist, so although I appreciate your opinion gnashley, this is not a valid criticism of package management software.
I agree with spurious's comment entirely.
My comments about upgrading to kernel 2.6.x is just a comment about the upgrade-mentality in general. I just see SO many posts where everything was working and then they upgrade and instead of improving something instead it's broken.
I agree generally with gnashley's comments regarding upgrades. I never use the --upgrade option with either apt-get or swaret. However, these are convenient tools to have when installing or upgrading individual packages, especially for important security upgrades such as openssh (apt-get install openssh, swaret --install openssh).
Originally posted by spurious That's an interesting thread, but I question the veracity. I just checked freshmeat, and swaret is still there
Yea its back in freshmeat, but if you ever hung around in Freenode, you know what he's talking about. I found it a bit odd that it was pulled from the slackware distro, and that all of the swaret forums are shut down.
Using slacks basic packages is as much control as
I am willing to give to someone else. I certainly will
never use any service that decides what's good for
me on my behalf. If I wanted to do that I'd go Winblows,
DeadRat, Debilian, GenPooh, you name it ... :)
Just to throw in my two cents, Luc is no longer the developer of SWareT; he stopped about a month and a half ago. LinuxSneaker took over and has done nothing but a great job at maintaining and improving SWareT. As for auto-upgrade software, only upgrade if you feel confident about it, and check the Slackware ChangeLog. Sometimes the ChangeLog has notes about packages that might change name or split apart, as was the case with elflibs->aaa_elflibs and oggutils splitting.
Originally posted by spurious That's an interesting thread, but I question the veracity. I just checked freshmeat, and swaret is still there, contrary to the information in that forum.
Also, notice that there's no link for the article purportedly cited from freshmeat; we don't know who originally wrote it, or from what context.
The comments about the issues with swaret are dated Nov 2003. Looking at the date on swaret's freshmeat page, it says it was added on February 26th, 2004. So it was indeed deleted and has since been readded.
I assume the guy guilty for swaret spam and slandering slapt-get would no longer be the maintainer. As of Feb 27, 2004, it was passed to a new maintainer, here is the post from the swaret announce forum:
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:08 pm Post subject: Major Announcement to All swaret Users
Luc and I have talked, and I am now the official maintainer of swaret. He is still the man who created it, and he and I still have technical discussions, but his involvement will be less then it was.
The reason why I'm announcing this is because I am going to formalize the development of swaret. Utilizing tools provided by sourceforge, I will begin transitioning code and information over.
What does this mean for you? Good things-there will be CVS, a more formal bug tracking system, and more of a "swaret development team". That being said, if you are interested or have contributed in any part of swaret (documentation, i18n, main program) please e-mail me if you have a sourceforge account (which is free). We will set it up so that no single person is a bottleneck (in other words, me) for updating code/files/documentation.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.