Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
06-22-2008, 05:49 AM
|
#31
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 212
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daedra
|
Hi,
I suggest changing --enable-optimize=-O2 to
Code:
--enable-optimize="-O2 -march=i686"
or to
Code:
--enable-optimize="$SLKFLAGS"
and then adding lines for i686 above where SLKFLAGS is set like this:
Code:
elif [ "$ARCH" = "i686" ]; then
SLKCFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686"
|
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 04:45 PM
|
#32
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Springfield, MO
Distribution: Slackware64-13.37
Posts: 1,182
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Good call, thank you for that, I updated the file.
Thanks Again.
Last edited by Daedra; 06-22-2008 at 04:58 PM.
|
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 05:34 PM
|
#33
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware, FreeBSD
Posts: 47
Rep:
|
You should enable jemalloc to for better memory mangement etc. It's default in the Mozilla builds. This is new in Firefox 3.
–enable-jemalloc
|
|
|
|
06-22-2008, 05:48 PM
|
#34
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware 12.1
Posts: 249
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_H
You should enable jemalloc to for better memory mangement etc. It's default in the Mozilla builds. This is new in Firefox 3.
–enable-jemalloc
|
If it is default in the mozilla builds, then my understanding is that it should not be necessary to add it to .mozconfig. I understood that '.mozconfig' settings are only necessary to change the build configuration from the defaults that are specified in the source tree.
Bill.
|
|
|
|
06-23-2008, 04:59 AM
|
#35
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 212
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_H
You should enable jemalloc to for better memory mangement etc. It's default in the Mozilla builds.
|
about :buildconfig in the navigation toolbar shows the compiler flags and the configure arguments used. The default linux binary shows only these configure arguments:
--enable-application=browser --enable-update-channel=release --enable-update-packaging --enable-optimize --disable-debug --disable-tests --enable-official-branding
|
|
|
|
06-23-2008, 05:38 AM
|
#36
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware 12.1
Posts: 249
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petri Kaukasoina
about:buildconfig in the navigation toolbar shows the compiler flags and the configure arguments used. The default linux binary shows only these configure arguments:
--enable-application=browser --enable-update-channel=release --enable-update-packaging --enable-optimize --disable-debug --disable-tests --enable-official-branding
|
Yes, this is exactly my point. about :buildconfig will only show the additional build options specified in 'mozconfig'. It does not for example show which 'toolkit' is used for the build or whether libxul is built. Both of these of course are.
I would like to know of a way to query the source tree to find all the default configuration options of which there are many.
Bill
|
|
|
|
06-23-2008, 06:14 AM
|
#37
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware, FreeBSD
Posts: 47
Rep:
|
>If it is default in the mozilla builds, then my understanding is that it should not be necessary to add it to .mozconfig.
Otherwise it doesn't kill you ;-) I don't know whether it's activated by default so I enabled it myself just to be sure.
|
|
|
|
06-24-2008, 08:43 PM
|
#39
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: lost in the midwest...
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,091
Rep:
|
i've used slackware since 9.1, and i have to admit it has never looked this good. thanks! Great Post!!!
|
|
|
|
06-25-2008, 11:09 PM
|
#40
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Springfield, MO
Distribution: Slackware64-13.37
Posts: 1,182
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Just to update everyone, I changed the slackbuild. It seems if you have read the post "firefox 3.0 + thunderbird = no email links" it turns out the Pat's firefox/thunderbird patch doesn't seem to be needed anymore and in some cases (mine and otheres) it was causing problems, I now have removed the patch from the slackbuild and now my email problem is fixed. So on the safe side I changed the build however you can still download the original slackbuild from here http://webpages.charter.net/daedra/1...SlackBuild.old
|
|
|
|
06-28-2008, 08:11 PM
|
#42
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Springfield, MO
Distribution: Slackware64-13.37
Posts: 1,182
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
So this patch is all you need to fix the application problem? I thought I read that you had to compile a whole bunch of gnome stuff to get that working? Also where did you add the patch, before or after compile?
|
|
|
|
06-28-2008, 08:26 PM
|
#43
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Vector
Posts: 318
Rep:
|
That so called subpixel rendering of colored pixels makes my eyes water... Its that bad. Blowing cigarette smoke in my face isn't nearly as bad.
I like my fonts with AA but no subpixel rendering.
http://img384.imageshack.us/img384/148/fontsfv1.png
That's how its done.
|
|
|
|
06-28-2008, 08:45 PM
|
#44
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Springfield, MO
Distribution: Slackware64-13.37
Posts: 1,182
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by r00tb33r
That so called subpixel rendering of colored pixels makes my eyes water... Its that bad. Blowing cigarette smoke in my face isn't nearly as bad.
I like my fonts with AA but no subpixel rendering.
http://img384.imageshack.us/img384/148/fontsfv1.png
That's how its done.
|
I can see what your saying, but without the subpixel rendering they just look to soft to me. I prefer subpixel rendering, but I also like the old bytecode nonAA rendering too, I didn't include that into my howto because it seems so few have CRTs now, most people have switched to LCD.
|
|
|
|
06-29-2008, 12:08 AM
|
#45
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Vector
Posts: 318
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daedra
I can see what your saying, but without the subpixel rendering they just look to soft to me. I prefer subpixel rendering, but I also like the old bytecode nonAA rendering too, I didn't include that into my howto because it seems so few have CRTs now, most people have switched to LCD.
|
Hmm, now that I think about it, it will look even worse on a CRT. Meaning I've been using LCDs for many years now. Perhaps it needs tuning for my current monitor, like the color order in a pixel, but I've played with that before, and none of the combinations produced a result I would be happy with. I definitely have to have AA on text at all times though, I even went the length of doing a GTK+ 1 hack, although I don't use that many of GTK+ 1 apps anymore.
NonAA renderings have their purpose... But not in a browser.
Matter of taste I guess. It didn't seem like a biggie back in Win 98 days where I had a choice of nonAA and nonAA.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|